Advertisement

Nitrogen sources and application rates affect emissions of N2O and NH3 in sugarcane

  • Iracema Alves Manoel Degaspari
  • Johnny Rodrigues Soares
  • Zaqueu Fernando Montezano
  • Stephen J. Del Grosso
  • André Cesar Vitti
  • Raffaella Rossetto
  • Heitor CantarellaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Best management practices for N fertilization should increase yields while reducing negative environmental effects such as losses by ammonia (NH3) volatilization and emission of greenhouse gases, especially nitrous oxide (N2O). We studied the impact on sugarcane of two N sources (UR: urea and CAN: calcium ammonium nitrate) in three N rates (30, 60, and 90 kg N ha−1 in the plant cane cycle and 60, 120, and 180 kg N ha−1 in ratoons) on a sugarcane field grown on a Red Latosol soil in southeastern Brazil. We measured sugarcane yields and N2O, CO2 and CH4 emissions in three crop cycles (plant cane, 2nd and 3rd ratoons), and NH3 in two crop cycles (2nd and 3rd ratoons). The accumulated emission of N2O from UR was significantly higher in comparison with those of CAN in all three crop cycles. The average emission factors for UR were 0.8% (plant cane), 1.1% (2nd ratoon) and 0.8% (3rd ratoon) and the corresponding figures for CAN were 0.4%, 0.7% and 0.5%, respectively. The N2O intensity was higher for UR (20.3 mg N–N2O kg−1 sugarcane stalk) than CAN (16.2 mg N–N2O kg−1 sugarcane stalk). The NH3 volatilization losses for CAN were less than 1% compared to 5–16% of the N applied as UR. Stalk yield increased with N application, but no difference was observed between UR and CAN. We concluded that CAN has the potential to reduce both NH3 and N2O losses compared with urea and is the preferred N source for sugarcane.

Keywords

Ammonia volatilization Calcium ammonium nitrate Nitrous oxide Straw Sugarcane yield Urea 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the CAPES Interuniversity exchange doctorate (Process: PDSE - 88881.134105/2016-01), CAPES Scholarship (Process 88882.157081), FAPESP Project 2013/50.365-5, CNPq Grant 310 478/2017-0, and Yara Fertilizers (Project Fundag 01054-IA Greenhouse).

Supplementary material

10705_2019_10045_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1286 kb)

References

  1. Behera SN, Sharma M, Aneja VP, Balasubramanian R (2013) Ammonia in the atmosphere: a review on emission sources, atmospheric chemistry and deposition on terrestrial bodies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:8092–8131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2051-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bento CB, Filoso S, Pitombo LM, Cantarella H, Rossetto R, Martinelli LA, Carmo JB (2018) Impacts of sugarcane agriculture expansion over low-intensity cattle ranch pasture in Brazil on greenhouse gases. J Environ Manage 206:980–988.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.085 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Borges CD, Carvalho JLN, Kölln OT, Sanches GM, Silva MJ, Castro SGQ, Castro SAQ, Sousa LL, Oliveira JVC, Cantarella H, Vargas VP, Tsai SM, Franco HCJ (2019) Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields? Biomass Bioenergy 120:21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantarella H, Rossetto R, Barbosa W, Penna MJ, Resende LCL (1999) Nitrogen losses as NH3 volatilization and sugarcane response to N fertilization in sugarcane harvested without straw burning (In Portuguese, with English abstract) In: Proceedings of the Brazilian Society of Sugar and Alcohol Technicians (STAB), vol 7, pp 782–787. Londrina, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantarella H, Mattos JRD, Quaggio JA, Rigolin AT (2003) Fruit yield of Valencia sweet orange fertilized with different N sources and the loss of applied N. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 67:215–223.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000003600.20499.76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantarella H, Trivelin PCO, Vitti AC (2007) Nitrogen and sulfur in sugarcane: Nitrogen and Sulfur in Brazilian Agriculture. Yamada T, Abdalla SRS, Vitti GC (eds.), IPNI: International Plant Nutrition Institute Piracicaba, Brazil, pp 355–412 (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  7. Cantarella H, Trivelin PCO, Contin TLM, Dias FLF, Rossetto R, Marcelino R, Coimbra RB, Quaggio JA (2008) Ammonia volatilisation from urease inhibitor-treated urea applied to sugarcane trash blankets. Sci Agric 65:397–401.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162008000400011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cantarella H, Otto R, Soares JR, Silva AGB (2018) Agronomic efficiency of NBPT as a urease inhibitor: a review. J Adv Res 13:19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.05.008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmo JB, Filoso S, Zotelli LC, Souza-Neto ER, Pitombo LM, Duarte-Neto PJ, Vargas VP, Andrade CA, Gava GJC, Rossetto R, Cantarella H, Elias-Neto A, Martinelli LA (2013) Infield greenhouse gas emissions from sugarcane soils in Brazil: effects from synthetic and organic fertilizer application and crop trash accumulation. Global Change Biol Bioenergy 5:267–280.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01199.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chien SH, Prochnow LI, Cantarella H (2009) Recent developments of fertilizer production and use to improve nutrient efficiency and minimize environmental impacts. Adv Agron 102:267–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(09)01008-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CONAB (2018) Survey of the sugarcane production: Brazilian Sugarcane Production. Technical Report 2017–2018. http://www.conab.gov.br. Accessed May 2018. (In Portuguese)
  12. Costa MCG, Vitti GC, Cantarella H (2003) Ammonia volatilization from N fertilizers in sugarcane harvested without straw burning (In Portuguese, with English abstract). R Bras Cien Solo 27:631–637.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832003000400007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crutzen PJ, Mosier AR, Smith KA, Winiwarter W (2008) N2O release from agro biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos Chem Phys 8:389–395.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-389-2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. da Silva JF, de Carvalho AM, Rein TA, Coser TR, Ribeiro Júnior WQ, Vieira DL, Coomes DA (2017) Nitrous oxide emissions from sugarcane fields in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agric Ecosyst Environ 246:55–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Castro SGQ, Decaro ST, Franco HCJ, Graziano Magalhães PS, Garside A, Mutton MA (2017) Best practices of nitrogen fertilization management for sugarcane under green cane trash blanket in Brazil. Sugar Tech 19:51–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0443-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denmead OT, Macdonald BCT, Bryant G, Naylor T, Wilson S, Griffith DWT, Wang WJ, Salter B, White I, Moody PW (2010) Emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from Australian sugarcane soils. Agr Forest Meteorol 150:748–756.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Embrapa-Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (2013) Brazilian System of Soil Classification 3rd ed Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  18. Filoso S, Carmo JB, Mardegan SF, Lins SRM, Gomes TF, Martinelli LA (2015) Reassessing the environmental impacts of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil to help meet sustainability goals. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1847–1856.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franco AA, Otto R, Faroni CE, Vitti AC, Oliveira ECA, Trivelin PCO (2011) Nitrogen in sugarcane derived from fertilizer under Brazilian field conditions. Field Crop Res 121:29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freney JR, Denmead OT, Wood AW, Saffigna PG, Chapman LS, Ham GJ, Hurney AP, Stewart RL (1992) Factors controlling ammonia loss from trash covered sugarcane fields fertilized with urea. Fert Res 31:341–349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01051285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freney JR, Denmead OT, Wood AW, Saffigna PG (1994) Ammonia loss following urea addition to sugar cane trash blankets. In: Egan BT (ed.), Proceedings of the conference of the Australian Soc. Sugar Cane Technologists. Townsville: Qld pp 114–121Google Scholar
  22. Gonzaga LC, Carvalho JLN, Oliveira BG, Soares JR, Cantarella H (2018) Crop residue removal and nitrification inhibitor application as strategies to mitigate N2O emissions in sugarcane fields. Biomass Bioenergy 119:206–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harty MA, Forrestal PJ, Watson CJ, McGeough KL, Carolan R, Elliot C, Krol D, Laughlin RJ, Richards KG, Lanigan GJ (2016) Reducing nitrous oxide emissions by changing N fertiliser use from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to urea based formulations. Sci Total Environ 563–564:576–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.120 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Holcomb JC, Sullivan DM, Horneck DA, Clough GH (2011) Effect of irrigation rate on ammonia volatilization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:2341–2347.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2010.0446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutchinson GL, Mosier AR (1981) Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:311–316.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500020017x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Greenhouse gas inventory reference manual, v.4. 2006. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html
  27. IPCC Summary for Policymakers In: Climate Change (2013) The physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds.), Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Jantalia CP, dos Santos HP, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM, Alves BJR (2008) Fluxes of nitrous oxide from soil under different crop rotations and tillage systems in the South of Brazil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 82:161–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9178-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim DG, Ramirez GH, Giltrap D (2013) Linear and nonlinear dependency of direct nitrous oxide emissions on fertilizer nitrogen input: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 168:53–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lisboa CC, Butterbach-Bahl K, Mauder M, Kiese R (2011) Bioethanol production from sugarcane and emissions of greenhouse gases—known and unknowns. Global Change Biol Bioenergy 3:277–292.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01095.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lourenço KS, Cassman NA, Pijl AS, van Veen JA, Cantarella H, Kuramae EE (2018a) Nitrosospira sp. govern nitrous oxide emissions in a tropical soil amended with residues of bioenergy crop. Front Microbiol 9:674.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00674
  32. Lourenço KS, Dimitrov MR, Pijl A, Soares JR, Carmo JB, van Veen JA, Cantarella H, Kuramae EE (2018b) Dominance of bacterial ammonium oxidizers and fungal denitrifiers in the complex nitrogen cycle pathways related to nitrous oxide emission. Global Change Biol Bioenergy 10:645–660.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lourenço KS, Rossetto R, Vitti AC, Montezano ZF, Soares JR, Sousa RM, do Carmo JB, Kuramae EE, Cantarella H (2019) Strategies to mitigate the nitrous oxide emissions from nitrogen fertilizer applied with organic fertilizers in sugarcane. Sci Total Environ 650:1476–1486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.037 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mariano E, Trivelin PCO, Vieira MX, Leite JM, Otto R, Franco HCJ (2012) Ammonia losses estimated by an open collector from urea applied to sugarcane straw. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 36:411–419.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832012000200010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martins MR, Jantalia CP, Polidoro JC, Batista JN, Alves BJR, Boddey RM, Urquiaga S (2015) Nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from N fertilization of maize crop under no-till in a Cerrado soil. Soil Till Res 151:75–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meier EA, Thorburn PJ, Wegener MK, Basford KE (2006) The availability of nitrogen from sugarcane trash on contrasting soils in the wet tropics of North Queensland. Nutr Cycl Agroecos 75:101–114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9015-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mira AB, Cantarella H, Souza-Netto GJM, Moreira LA, Kamogawa MY, Otto R (2017) Optimizing urease inhibitor usage to reduce ammonia emission following urea application over crop residues. Agric Ecosyst Environ 248:105–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mosier AR, Halvorson AD, Reule CA, Liu XJ (2006) Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Colorado. J Environ Qual 35:1584–1598.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0232 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ng Kee Kwong KF, Deville J (1987) Residual fertilizer nitrogen as influenced by timing and nitrogen forms in a silty clay soil under sugarcane in Mauritius. Fert Res 14:219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01050666 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Otto R, Castro SAQ, Mariano E, Castro SGQ, Franco HCJ, Trivelin PCO (2016) Nitrogen use efficiency for sugarcane-biofuel production: what is next? Bioenergy Res 9:1272–1289.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9763-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Otto R, Zavaschi E, Souza GJM, Machado BA, Mira AB (2017) Ammonia volatilization from nitrogen fertilizers applied to sugarcane straw. Rev Cienc Agron 48:413–418.  https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20170048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pan B, Lam SK, Mosier A, Luo Y, Chen D (2016) Ammonia volatilization from synthetic fertilizers and its mitigation strategies: a global synthesis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 232:283–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paredes DS, Lessa ACR, Sant’Anna SAC, Boddey RM, Urquiaga S, Alves BJR (2014) Nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization induced by vinasse and N fertilizer application in a sugarcane crop at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 98:41–55.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pinheiro PL, Recous S, Dietrich G, Weiler DA, Giovelli RL, Mezzalira AP, Giacomini SJ (2018) Straw removal reduces the mulch physical barrier and ammonia volatilization after urea application in sugarcane. Atmos Environ 194:179–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pitombo LM, Cantarella H, Packer APC, Ramos NP, Carmo JB (2017) Straw preservation reduced total N2O emissions from a sugarcane field. Soil Use Manage 33:583–594.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rawlings JO, Pantula SG, Dickey DA (1998) Applied regression analysis: a research tool, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roche L, Forrestal PJ, Lanigan GJ, Richards KG, Shaw LJ, Wall DP (2016) Impact of fertiliser nitrogen formulation, and N stabilisers on nitrous oxide emissions in spring barley. Agric Ecosyst Environ 233:229–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rochette P, Macdonald JD, Angers DA, Chantigny MH, Gasser MO, Bertrand N (2009) Banding urea increased ammonia volatilization in a dry acidic soil. J Environ Qual 38:1383–1390.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0295 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rochette P, Angers DA, Chantigny MH, Gasser MO, MacDonald JD, Pelster DE, Bertrand N (2013) Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen retention: how deep to incorporate urea? J Environ Qual 42:1635–1642.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.05.0192 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Schoninger EL, González-Villalba HA, Bendassolli JA, Ocheuze Trivelin PC (2018) Fertilizer nitrogen and corn plants: not all volatilized ammonia is lost. Agron J 110:1111–1118.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.07.0372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Siqueira Neto M, Galdos MV, Feigl BJ, Cerri CEP, Cerri CC (2016) Direct N2O emission factors for synthetic N-fertilizer and organic residues applied on sugarcane for bioethanol production in Central-Southern Brazil. Global Change Biol Bioenergy 8:269–280.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Snyder CS, Bruulsema TW, Jensen TL, Fixen PE (2009) Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:247–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Snyder CS, Davidson EA, Smith P, Venterea RT (2014) Agriculture: sustainable crop and animal production to help mitigate nitrous oxide emissions. Curr Opin Env Sust 9–10:46–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soares JR, Cantarella H, Vargas VP, Carmo JB, Martins AA, Sousa RM, Andrade CA (2015) Enhanced-efficiency fertilizers in nitrous oxide emissions from urea applied to sugarcane. J Environ Qual 4:423–430.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.02.0096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Soares JR, Cassman NA, Kielak AM, Pijl A, Carmo JB, Lourenço KS, Laanbroek HJ, Cantarella H, Kuramae EE (2016) Nitrous oxide omission related to ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and mitigation options from N fertilization in a tropical toil. Sci Rep 6:30349.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30349 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Systat Software (2006) Inc—SSI Sigmaplot for windows, version 12.5Google Scholar
  57. Tenuta M, Beauchamp EG (2003) Nitrous oxide production from granular nitrogen fertilizers applied to a silt loam soil. Canadian J Soil Sci 83:521–532.  https://doi.org/10.4141/S02-062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van Raij B, Cantarella H, Quaggio JA, Furlani AMC (1996) Sugarcane. In: Recommendations for lime and fertilizer for the State of São Paulo Campinas: Instituto Agronômico (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  59. van Raij B, Andrade JC, Cantarella H, Quaggio JA (2001) Chemical analysis for evaluation of fertility of tropical soils. Campinas: Instituto Agronômico (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  60. Venterea RT, Clough TJ, Coulter JA, Breuillin-Sessoms F (2015) Ammonium sorption and ammonia inhibition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria explain contrasting soil N2O production. Sci Rep 5:12153.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12153 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Verburg K, Zhao Z, Biggs JS, Thorburn PJ (2016) Controlled release fertilisers—lessons from a review and early results characterising release, synchrony and nitrogen losses. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Cane Technol 38:159–169Google Scholar
  62. Vitti AC, Trivelin PCO, Gava GJC, Franco HCJ, Bologna IR, Faroni CE (2007) Sugarcane yield related with the nitrogen fertilizer placement over residues of sugarcane harvest without burning (in Portuguese). Rev Bras Cienc Solo 31:491–498.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832007000300009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vitti AC, Franco HCJ, Trivelin PCO, Ferreira DA, Otto R, Fortes C, Faroni CE (2011) Nitrogênio proveniente da adubação nitrogenada e de resíduos culturais na nutrição da cana-planta. Pesq Agropec Bras 46:287–293.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2011000300009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iracema Alves Manoel Degaspari
    • 1
  • Johnny Rodrigues Soares
    • 2
  • Zaqueu Fernando Montezano
    • 1
  • Stephen J. Del Grosso
    • 3
  • André Cesar Vitti
    • 4
  • Raffaella Rossetto
    • 4
  • Heitor Cantarella
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Soils and Environmental Resources CenterAgronomic Institute of Campinas, IACCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.School of Agricultural EngineeringUniversity of Campinas, UNICAMPCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.Natural Resource Ecology LaboratoryColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  4. 4.São Paulo State Agency for Agribusiness TechnologyPiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations