Advertisement

Agronomic effectiveness of urea deep placement technology for upland maize production

  • Sampson Agyin-BirikorangEmail author
  • Ignatius Tindjina
  • Raphael Adu-Gyamfi
  • Haruna W. Dauda
  • Abdul-Rahman A. Fuseini
  • Upendra Singh
Original Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Effective fertilizer management is critical for sustainable maize production. Field trials were conducted in six locations in northern Ghana during the 2016 and 2017 farming seasons to evaluate the agronomic effectiveness and economic viability of urea deep placement technology (UDP), which involves deep placement of urea supergranules (USG), for maize production. This fertilization strategy was compared with four other maize fertilization strategies: (1) microdosing (MD); (2) farmer practice (FP), which involves surface broadcasting of granular fertilizer; (3) modified farmer practice (MFP), where granular fertilizer was incorporated into the soil; and (4) NPK-only, where no supplemental N was added. Averaged across all six locations and both years, UDP produced 18% more grain yield than MFP, 38% more than MD, 155% more than FP, and 270% more than NPK-only. The greatest apparent N recovery efficiency of 73% occurred in MD, followed by UDP (68%), NPK-only (63%), MFP (61%) and FP (35%), in that order. However, agronomic efficiency followed the order: UDP > MFP = MD > NPK-only = FP. The greatest gross profit margin of 49% was obtained with UDP, followed by MFP (41%) and MD (33%). Farmer practice resulted in a break-even level (3%) whereas NPK-only resulted in a loss (< − 35%). From the combined results, we conclude that, barring other external factors such as drought, flooding, pests, diseases, etc., UDP could be one of the most efficient fertilizer management strategies for sustainable maize production. Further studies should evaluate optimum timing of USG application for increased productivity and profitability.

Keywords

Agronomic efficiency Apparent N recovery efficiency Briquettes Farmer practice Grain yield Gross profit margin Microdosing Northern Ghana Sub-Saharan Africa Urea supergranules 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by United States Agency for International Development’s Feed the Future Soil Fertility Technology Adoption, Policy Reform and Knowledge Management Project through the International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC). We thank Mr. Emmanuel K.M. Vorleto of Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) Soil Lab and Dr. Sammy Afful of Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC) analytical lab for soil and plant tissue analyses. We also wish to express our deep appreciation to Mrs. Lauren Johnson, Courtney Greene and Julie Kohler of IFDC Headquarters for their reviews and constructive criticisms.

Supplementary material

10705_2019_10039_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)
10705_2019_10039_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (225 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 225 kb)

References

  1. Abdullahi S, Abdulwahab K, Abubakar GS (2017) Gross margin analysis of modern groundnut oil extraction in Gombe Metropolis, Gombe State, Nigeria. World J Agric Res 5:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adjei MB, Gardner CS, Mayo D, Seawright T, Jennings E (2000) Fertilizer treatment effects on forage yield and quality of tropical pasture grasses. Proc Soil Crop Sci Soc Fla 59:32–37Google Scholar
  3. Adu-Gyamfi R, Agyin-Birikorang S, Tindjina I, Ahmed SM, Twumasi AD, Avornyo VK, Singh U (2019) One-time fertilizer briquettes application for maize production in savanna agroecologies of Ghana. Agron J 111:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.04.0292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agyin-Birikorang S, Winings JH, Yin X, Singh U, Sanabria J (2018) Field evaluation of agronomic effectiveness of multi-nutrient fertilizer briquettes for upland crop production. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 110:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akudugu MA, Guo E, Dadzie SK (2012) Adoption of modern agricultural production technologies by farm households in Ghana: What factors influence their decisions? J Biol Agric Healthcare 2:1–13Google Scholar
  6. Bandaogo A, Bidjokazo F, Youl S, Safo E, Abaidoo R, Opoku A (2015) Effect of fertilizer deep placement with urea supergranule on nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in Sourou Valley (Burkina Faso). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 102:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banful AB (2008) Operational details of the 2008 fertilizer subsidy in Ghana. Preliminary report, draft. 2008. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowen WT, Diamond RB, Singh U, Thompson TP (2004) Urea deep placement increases yield and save Nitrogen fertilizer in farmer’s field in Bangladesh. Rice is life: scientific perspectives for the 21st century. In: Proceedings of the world rice research conference held in Tsukuba, Japan, 4–7 November. pp 369–372Google Scholar
  9. Brammer H (1962) In: Wills JB (ed) Soils: in agriculture and landuse in Ghana. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen—total. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3: chemical methods. ASA, SSSA, CSSA, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  12. Cai GX, Freney JR, Humphreys E, Simpson JR (1988) Use of surface films to reduce ammonia volatilization from flooded rice fields. Aust J Agr Res 39:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Camara BS, Camara F, Berthe A, Oswald A (2013) Micro-dosing of fertilizer: a technology for farmers’ needs and resources. Int J Agric Sci 3:387–399Google Scholar
  14. Demisie W (2018) Fertilizer microdosing technology in sorghum, millet and maize production at small-scale level in Africa: A review. Int J Adv Sci Res Dev 5:39–49Google Scholar
  15. Farris PW, Bendle NT, Pfeifer PE, Reibstein DJ (2010) Marketing metrics: the definitive guide to measuring marketing performance, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, p 414Google Scholar
  16. Gaihre YK, Singh U, Islam SMM, Huda A, Islam MR, Satter MA, Sanabria J, Islam MdR, Shah AL (2015) Impacts of urea deep placement on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from rice fields in Bangladesh. Geoderma 260:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallaher RN, Weldon CO, Futral JG (1975) An aluminum block digester for plant and soil analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39:803–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 1, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 383–411Google Scholar
  19. Hayashi K, Abdoulaye T, Gerard B, Bationo A (2007) Evaluation of application timing in fertilizer micro-dosing technology on millet production in Niger, West Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 80:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huda A, Gaihre YK, Islam MR, Singh U, Islam MdR, Sanabria J, Satter MA, Afroz H, Halder A, Jahiruddin M (2016) Floodwater ammonium, nitrogen use efficiency and rice yields with fertilizer deep placement and alternate wetting and drying under tipple rice cropping systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IFDC (International Fertilizer Development Center) (2007). Mitigating poverty and environmental degradation through nutrient management in South Asia. IFDC Report, March 2007. International Fertilizer Development CentreGoogle Scholar
  22. IFDC (International Fertilizer Development Center) (2013) Fertilizer deep placement. IFDC solutions. IFDC, muscle shoals, AL 35662 USA, p 6. http://issuu.com/ifdcinfo/docs/fdp_8pg_final_web?e=1773260/1756718
  23. IFDC (International Fertilizer Development Center) (2015) IFDC Quarterly Magazine 40(4). http://ifdc.org/ifdc-magazine
  24. Ion V, Dicu G, Dumbravă M, Temocico G, Alecu IN, Băşa AG, State D (2015) Harvest index at maize in different growing conditions. Rom Biotechnol Lett 20:10951–10960Google Scholar
  25. Islam MSh, Rahman F, Hossain ATMS (2011) Effects of NPK briquette on rice (Oryza sativa) in tidal flooded ecosystem. The Agriculturists 9:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Issahaku A, Campion BB, Edziyie R (2016) Rainfall and temperature changes and variability in the Upper East Region of Ghana. Earth Space Sci 3:284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ISSS/ISRIC/FAO (1998) World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Report 84, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  28. Johansson E, Haby L, Prieto-Linde ML, Svensson SE (2013) Influence of fertilizer placement on yield and protein composition in spring malting barley. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13:895–904Google Scholar
  29. Kapoor V, Singh U, Patil SK, Magre H, Shrivastava LK, Mishra VN, Das RO, Samadhiya VK, Sanabria J, Diamond R (2008) Rice growth, grain yield and floodwater nutrient dynamics as affected by nutrient placement method and rate. Agron J 100:526–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen–inorganic forms. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 2, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 643–698Google Scholar
  31. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  32. Miah MAM, Gaihre YK, Hunter G, Singh U, Hossain SA (2016) Fertilizer deep placement increases rice production: evidence from farmers’ fields in southern Bangladesh. Agron J 108:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MOFA (Ministry of Food and Agriculture) (2011) Agriculture in Ghana: facts and figures. Statistics, Research and Information Directorate (SRID). http://mofa.gov.gh/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/mofa_facts_and_figures.pdf
  34. Nkebiwe PM, Weinmann M, Bar-Tal A, Muller T (2016) Fertilizer placement to improve crop nutrients acquisition and yield: a review and meta-analysis. Field Crops Res 196:389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pagani A, Echeverria HE, Andrade FH, Sainz Rozas HR (2012) Effects of nitrogen and sulfur application on grain yield, nutrient accumulation and harvest indexes in maize. J Plant Nutr 35:1080–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prinčič A, Mahne I, Megušar F, Paul EA, Tiedje JM (1998) Effects of pH and oxygen and ammonium concentrations on the community structure of nitrifying bacteria from wastewater. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3584–3590PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Rochette P, Angers DA, Chantigny MH, Gasser M, MacDonald JD, Pelster DE, Bertrand N (2013) Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen retention: how deep to incorporate urea? J Environ Qual 42:1635–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SAS Institute Inc (2018) Base SAS® 9.4 Utilities: Reference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
  39. Shen Y, Peng S (2017) Exploring the trends in nitrogen input and nitrogen use efficiency for agricultural sustainability. Sustainability 9:1905.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sumner ME, Miller PW (1996) Cation exchange capacity, and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 2: chemical properties, 3rd edn. ASA, SSSA, CSSA, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas W (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 3. SSSA Book Ser 5. SSSA, Madison, pp 475–490Google Scholar
  42. Walkley A, Black LA (1934) An examination of methods for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang HH, Hegazy AM, Jiang X, Hu ZY, Lu J, Mu J, Zhang XR, Zhu XQ (2016) Suppression of ammonia volatilization from rice-wheat rotation fields amended with controlled release urea and urea. Agron J 39:177–186Google Scholar
  44. Winings JH, Yin X, Agyin-Birikorang S, Singh U, Sanabria J, Savoy JH, Allen FL, Saxton AM (2017) Agronomic effectiveness of an organically enhanced nitrogen fertilizer. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 108:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wnuk A, Górny AG, Bocianowski J, Kozak M (2013) Visualizing harvest index in crops. Commun Biometry Crop Sci 8:48–59Google Scholar
  46. Yao Y, Zhang M, Tiana Y, Zhaoc M, Zhanga B, Zhaoa M, Zenga K, Yin B (2018) Urea deep placement for minimizing NH3 loss in an intensive rice cropping system. Field Crops Res 218:254–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yin XH, McClure MA (2013) Relationship of corn yield, biomass, 851 and leaf nitrogen with normalized difference vegetation index and plant height. Agron J 105:1005–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yoseftabar S (2013) Effect of nitrogen management on panicle structure and yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Agric Crop Sci 5:1224–1227Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil and Plant Nutrition Division, Fertilizer ResearchInternational Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC)Muscle ShoalsUSA
  2. 2.Agriculture Technology Transfer ProjectInternational Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC)TamaleGhana
  3. 3.Agronomy Department, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity for Development Studies (UDS)TamaleGhana

Personalised recommendations