Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 116, Issue 1, pp 41–56 | Cite as

Nitrogen use efficiency of 15N urea applied to wheat based on fertiliser timing and use of inhibitors

  • Ashley J. WallaceEmail author
  • Roger D. Armstrong
  • Peter R. Grace
  • Clemens Scheer
  • Debra L. Partington
Open Access
Original Article
  • 569 Downloads

Abstract

Improving fertiliser nitrogen (N) use efficiency is essential to increase productivity and avoid environmental damage. Using a 15N mass balance approach, we investigated the effects of five N fertiliser management strategies to test the hypothesis that increasing uptake of applied N by wheat improves productivity and reduces loss of N in a semi-arid environment. Three experiments were conducted between 2012 and 2014. Treatments included urea application (50 kg N/ha) at sowing with and without nitrification inhibitor (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, DMPP) and surface broadcast with and without urease inhibitor (n-butyl thiophosphoric triamide, NBPT) at the end of tillering plus an unfertilised control. It was found that deferring fertiliser application until the end of tillering decreased losses of fertiliser N (35–52%) through increasing uptake by the crop and or recovery in the soil at harvest, while maintaining yield except when rainfall following application was low. In this case, deferring application reduced fertiliser uptake (− 71%) and grain yield (− 18%) and increased recovery of N in the soil (+ 121%). Use of DMPP or NBPT reduced N loss where seasonal conditions were conducive to denitrification during winter (DMPP) and volatilisation or denitrification later in the season (NBPT). Their effect on grain yield was less significant; DMPP increased yield (+ 3–31%) in all years and NBPT increased yield (+ 7–11%) in 2 of 3 years compared to unamended urea. The majority of crop N uptake was supplied from soil reserves and as a result, crop recovery of applied N was not strongly related to grain yield response.

Keywords

Nitrification inhibitor Urease inhibitor Recovery efficiency Physiological efficiency Agronomic efficiency 

Introduction

Nitrogen (N) fertiliser is a key input in dryland grains production systems, however its use can result in environmental damage via greenhouse gas emissions as well as eutrophication of waterways. Combined with an expanding world population there is a need to identify practices that can improve the efficiency with which N fertilisers are utilised (Zhang et al. 2015). Nitrogen use efficiency can be measured in a variety of ways; at its most basic level the agronomic efficiency (AE) of fertiliser application is measured as the increase in grain yield divided by the rate of application (Dobermann 2007). Increases in AE of fertiliser application can be achieved through a combination of either increased crop recovery of applied N (crop recovery efficiency, REc), or increased yield gain per unit of fertiliser N uptake (physiological efficiency, PE). It is therefore possible that by increasing REc, loss of applied N can be reduced while simultaneously improving productivity.

Gardner and Drinkwater (2009) indicated that across a range of environments and production systems, REc averages 33% in the year of application, while in Australian grains production systems REc averages 44% (Angus and Grace 2017). The amount of rainfall following application is a major determinant of these observations through its effect on loss mechanisms as well as the ability of the crop to access applied N. Soil factors such as organic matter, pH and texture can also have a significant effect on these processes (Cameron et al. 2013), interacting with climate and by extension REc. Improvements to REc will therefore require better temporal matching of N supply to periods of high crop demand and avoiding periods where the risk of loss increases.

Options to manipulate temporal supply of fertiliser N include altered timing of application and the use of inhibitors. Altering the timing of fertiliser application can increase uptake of applied N through a combination of reducing loss (Harris et al. 2016) and better matching supply to periods when demand and ability of the crop to compete for N is higher (Kirda et al. 2001; Limaux et al. 1999). However, delaying application of N to wheat beyond tillering may result in a trade-off between grain yield and protein (Fischer et al. 1993; McDonald 1989).

Inhibitor treated fertilisers also influence the temporal supply of fertiliser N. Urease inhibitors such as NBPT slow the hydrolysis of urea into ammonium (NH4+) (Chen et al. 2008) thereby delaying crop access to applied N and reducing potential for volatilisation loss (Turner et al. 2010). Nitrification inhibitors such as DMPP slow the oxidation of NH4+ to nitrite thereby restricting nitrate (NO3) supply and reducing the likelihood of denitrification and leaching (Friedl et al. 2017; Weiske et al. 2001; Yu et al. 2007). While both nitrification and urease inhibitors have been shown to increase REc the impact on yield has been less consistent (Abalos et al. 2014), often resulting in limited increases in grain yield (Freney et al. 1992; Harris et al. 2016; Xu et al. 2000; Zhang et al. 2010), although this may in part relate to a lack of studies investigating their use at sub-optimal N rates where the benefit of reducing N loss is likely to be higher (Rose et al. 2018). Furthermore, studies comparing both timing and the use of inhibitors to improve NUE of wheat in semi-arid environments are limited despite the evidence for significant loss of applied N in such environments (Armstrong et al. 1998; Patra et al. 1996; Pilbeam et al. 1997). Further investigation is therefore required to improve NUE in such environments.

This paper outlines findings from a 3-year study investigating options to mitigate loss of fertiliser N and improve NUE of rainfed wheat grown on alkaline clay soils in a temperate, semi-arid environment. The methods tested include altered timing of application (either incorporated at sowing or surface applied at the end of tillering) and the use of inhibitor (nitrification at sowing and urease at the end of tillering) treated urea in order to test the following hypotheses:
  1. 1.

    Crop uptake will be increased, and loss of applied N decreased through controlling temporal supply of mineral N (using timing of application or inhibitors) to avoid periods where the risk of losses are high and coincide with periods of greater crop demand.

     
  2. 2.

    Increasing crop uptake and reducing loss of applied N through the manipulation of temporal N supply will also increase wheat yield, thereby eliciting the importance of REc to AE for wheat grown in a temperate, semi-arid environment.

     

Materials and methods

Experimental sites

Wheat productivity and NUE was measured at three sites in the Wimmera region of Victoria, Australia between 2012 and 2014. Experiments were conducted at Taylors Lake (36° 47′ 7″ S, 142° 23′ 41″ E) in 2012 and 2013 and at the Victorian State Government Plant Breeding Centre near Horsham (36° 44′ 49″ S, 142° 6′ 48″ E) in 2014. The Wimmera region is characterised by hot, dry summers and mild winters with the majority of rain falling during winter. Mean annual rainfall is 440 mm at Taylors Lake and 423 mm at Horsham (Bureau of Meteorology 2017). All sites had a strong history of continuous cropping including common vetch (Vicia sativa) followed by wheat (Triticum aestivum), faba bean (Vicia faba) followed by canola (Brassica napus) and field pea (Pisumsativum) followed by barley (Hordeum vulgare) grown in the 2 years prior to experimentation for the 2012, 2013 and 2014 experimental sites respectively.

Experimental design

Experiments were randomised complete block designs including five replicates nested within a larger N management trial of the same design. Treatments included four N fertiliser management strategies plus a zero N control. Fertilised treatments were applied at a rate of 50 kg N/ha which is representative of rates applied to commercial crops in the region. Fertiliser strategies tested were: N applied as urea banded 25 mm below the seed at sowing (50 N), DMPP treated urea banded 25 mm below the seed at sowing (50 N DMPP), urea surface applied at the end of tillering/Zadoks growth stage 30 (Zadoks et al. 1974), (0:50 N) and NBPT treated urea surface applied at the end of tillering (0:50 N NBPT).

Soil characterisation

All sites were located on grey vertosol soils (Isbell 2002) characterised by a clay texture containing low to moderate levels of carbon (total and organic) and N, with neutral topsoils, increasing in pH down the profile. Soil properties were measured by taking a composite sample of three soil cores to a depth of 1.2 m from each replicate. Additional cores were taken from the broader trial (for the treatments listed above) at harvest and analysed for soil water and mineral N. Soil cores were dried at either 105 °C (soil moisture analysis) or 40 °C (chemical and physical analysis) until constant weight prior to analysis. Electrical conductivity was low throughout most of the upper profile but increased significantly at all sites below 0.4 m as did soil exchangeable sodium in 2013 and 2014. Further details of the 2012 soil profile are contained in Table 1, further details of the 2013 and 2014 soil profiles can be found in Wallace et al. 2018.
Table 1

Selected chemical and physical soil characteristics for the 2012 experimental site at Taylors Lake, Victoria

Soil depth (m)

Total carbona (g/kg)

Total organic carbonb (g/kg)

Total nitrogena (g/kg)

pH (CaCl2)c

Electrical conductivityd (dS/m)

Claye (%)

Silte (%)

Sande (%)

Bulk densityf (g/cm3)

0–0.1

11.3 (0.96)

9.6 (0.87)

1.2 (0.03)

7.50 (0.06)

0.17 (0.01)

48.13 (1.70)

43.71 (1.26)

8.17 (0.46)

1.10

0.1–0.2

9.0 (0.25)

6.7 (0.38)

1.0 (0.03)

7.86 (0.06)

0.19 (0.02)

56.93 (1.74)

34.41 (1.32)

8.65 (0.99)

1.19

0.2–0.4

11.0 (1.82)

6.5 (0.23)

0.9 (0.03)

8.12 (0.03)

0.30 (0.02)

50.38 (2.77)

32.00 (4.11)

17.62 (6.10)

1.16

0.4–0.8

9.8 (0.71)

4.3 (0.39)

0.7 (0.03)

8.52 (0.02)

0.66 (0.01)

46.93 (10.84)

41.35 (10.25)

11.72 (0.60)

1.09

0.8–1.2

6.7 (1.76)

1.8 (0.24)

0.5 (0.03)

8.48 (0.03)

2.70 (0.36)

58.54 (2.10)

26.95 (1.08)

14.51 (2.72)

1.09

Values presented in parentheses represent the standard error of the mean

aMeasured by combustion of air dry soils using LECO combustion analyser (n = 3)

bMeasured by the method of Walkley and Black (1934) (n = 3)

cMeasured in 0.01 M CaCl2 using a glass electrode and a 1:5 soil to extract ratio (n = 5)

dMeasured in water using a probe and a 1:5 soil to extract ratio (n = 5)

eMeasured using a laser particle size analyser (Malvern Mastersizer 2000, Malvern, UK) (n = 3)

fMeasured using large (> 75 mm diameter) in-tact cores (n = 2)

Soil water filled pore space (WFPS) was also monitored for the 50 N plots at 9 am daily to a depth of 0.05 m using ML2 theta probes connected to Delta-T GP1 data loggers (Delta-T Devices Limited, Cambridge, UK). Theta probes were calibrated based on the manufacturer’s method (Delta T, 2004) and WFPS calculated according to the method of Linn and Doran (1984).

Crop management

Experimental sites were managed similarly to the surrounding paddock; in 2012 and 2013 previous crop residues were burnt, while in 2014 light cultivation was applied prior to sowing. In 2013, 28 kg N/ha was surface applied as urea 1 month prior to sowing in accordance with management of the surrounding paddock by the host farmer. All plots received 128 kg/ha double superphosphate (21 kg P/ha, 5.1 kg S/ha) banded with the seed. Sowing of wheat cvs. Gregory, Grenade Cl Plus and Scout was conducted on 6 June, 27 May and 20 May in 2012, 2013 and 2014 respectively. Weeds, pests and disease were controlled using a variety of chemicals depending on seasonal conditions and in line with best management practice. In 2014, rainfall was significantly below the long-term average (Fig. 2) and to avoid the potential for crop failure, equivalent to 31 mm of rainfall was applied to the plots. Irrigation was spread across 3 days; 19, 20 and 22 September to minimise the potential for waterlogging.

15N mass balance

Steel micro-plots (0.5 × 0.3 m) were inserted into an unfertilised area near the end of each plot to a depth of 0.2 m. Each micro-plot contained two rows of wheat, spaced 0.26 m apart and following emergence, plant populations were thinned to 125 plants/m2. 15N enriched (10% a.e.) urea was dissolved in water and applied using a pipette at a rate of between 5 and 20 mL of solution containing 1.7 g urea per micro-plot; equivalent to 50 kg N/ha. Where required, DMPP or NBPT was added to the solution at a minimum of the manufacturers' recommended rate and thoroughly mixed prior to application. Fertiliser was applied immediately after sowing (50 N and 50 N DMPP treatments) and at growth stage 30 corresponding to; 3 September, 18 August and 21 August in 2012, 2013 and 2014 respectively (0:50 N and 0:50 N NBPT treatments). Where urea was applied at sowing, a narrow furrow was formed immediately beside and 25 mm below the depth of the seed to replicate as far as possible, urea placement within the broader experimental plots. The furrow was closed following urea application. Where urea was applied at growth stage 30, it was applied as evenly as possible across the soil surface.

The wheat in each micro-plot was harvested, dried at 70 °C and manually threshed to separate grain and straw before fine grinding in preparation for analysis. Soils from within each micro-plot were completely excavated at depths of 0–0.1 and 0.1–0.2 m with additional cores taken from 0.2 to 0.4 m. Soils were weighed and then dried at 40 °C before being thoroughly mixed and subsampled prior to fine grinding in preparation for analysis. Additional subsamples were dried at 105 °C to determine soil water content of both the fresh and 40 °C dried material. Plant and soil samples were analysed for total N and atom % 15N by a continuous flow isotope ratio mass-spectrometer (SERCON 20-22), with samples from the 0 N plots used to quantify natural abundance of 15N.

In addition to biomass samples taken from the 15N microplots, samples were also collected from the surrounding plots to measure above ground biomass and N content during the growing season. Single quadrats (1 m2 in size) were collected from each plot during tillering and at anthesis. Plant samples were dried at 70 °C and weighed before being fine ground in preparation for analysis of total N by dry combustion using a LECO combustion analyser.

Weather measurements

Weather data was collected at each experimental site using an automated weather station (MEA, Magill) with daily totals (rainfall), maximums and minimums (temperature) taken at 9 am. Where technical problems interfered with the collection of data, daily results were substituted with data from the nearest Bureau of Meteorology monitoring site (Bureau of Meteorology 2017).

Data analysis

Fertiliser recovery in soil and plant material and the proportion of N derived from fertiliser was calculated using the approach of Malhi et al. (2004). Indices of NUE were calculated according to those outlined by Dobermann (2007) where:
$$\begin{aligned} & {\text{N recovery efficiency by the crop}}\,\left( {{\text{RE}}_{\text{c}} } \right) = {\text{fertiliser N uptake}} \div {\text{amount of N applied}} \\ & {\text{Physiological efficiency}}\,\left( {\text{PE}} \right) = \left( {{\text{yield}}{-}{\text{yield of unfertilised control}}} \right) \div {\text{fertiliser N uptake}} \\ & {\text{Agronomic efficiency}}\,\left( {\text{AE}} \right) = {\text{RE}}_{\text{c}} \times {\text{PE}} \\ & \quad = \left( {{\text{Yield}}{-}{\text{yield of unfertilised control}}} \right) \div {\text{amount of N applied}} \\ \end{aligned}$$

Statistical analysis was undertaken using analysis of variance to determine significant differences between treatments and years at a 5% least significant difference test. Where required, square root or natural logarithmic transformation was undertaken to maintain normality of the dataset prior to analysis. Pearson correlation analysis using a two-sided test was undertaken to identify relationships between explanatory variables and aboveground biomass, grain yield, and fertiliser recovery at harvest. All analysis was undertaken using GenStat 17 Edition (Payne et al. 2014).

Results

Soil conditions prior to sowing

Soil water content prior to sowing was rarely significantly higher than at harvest. The exception was at shallower depths; particularly in 2012 when rainfall in May and June increased topsoil water content above the ‘air-dry’ values observed at harvest (Fig. 1). Total soil mineral N (NO3 and NH4+) to a depth of 1.2 m was low across all sites prior to sowing; 71 kg/ha in 2012, 39 kg/ha in 2013 and 57 kg/ha in 2014 to a depth of 1.2 m. Distribution of mineral N throughout the soil profile varied between sites (Fig. 1). In 2012 and 2014, 55% of profile mineral N was present below 0.4 m while in 2013, 65% of profile mineral N was present at depths less than 0.4 m.
Fig. 1

Volumetric soil water content (%) immediately prior to sowing (closed captions) and averaged across treatments at harvest (open captions) (a), soil mineral N content (mg/kg) at sowing (b) to a depth of 1.2 m at Taylors Lake in 2012 and 2013 and Horsham in 2014. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 5 at sowing, n = 25 at harvest)

Rainfall and temperature

Total annual rainfall varied widely across the 3 years of experimentation; 331 mm (decile 2: representing the lowest 20% of the historical record) and 393 mm (decile 4) at Taylors Lake in 2012 and 2013 respectively and 253 mm (decile 1) at Horsham in 2014. Growing season rainfall (measured from April to October) was 257 mm (decile 3), 329 mm (decile 6) and 166 mm (decile 1) in 2012, 2013 and 2014 respectively. In 2012, the majority of rain fell between May and September, while in 2013 this period extended to October (Fig. 2). In 2014, rainfall during late winter and spring was well below average with most occurring between April and July.
Fig. 2

Daily soil WFPS (0–0.05 m) during the growing season (a) and monthly rainfall totals during the experimental period and long-term average (LTA) at Taylors Lake and Horsham (b). Rainfall data for September 2014 includes 31 mm of irrigation. Soil WFPS prior to 14-August 2012 and 6-July 2013 based on soil cores, thereafter measured using continuous logging soil moisture probes

Temperature stress due to either frost or heat near the time of anthesis was minimal across all 3 years. In 2012, one frost (minimum temperature < 2.2 °C) was measured within ± 10 days of anthesis. During 2013 and 2014 there were five and four mild frosts respectively, however no major frosts (< − 1.5 °C) were observed. Heat stress events (maximum temperature > 32 °C) were measured on two occasions within ± 10 days of anthesis in 2012 (reaching a maximum of 33.2 °C) and not in any other year.

Crop response to applied N

Applying N fertiliser increased crop N uptake throughout the growing season at mid-tillering (+ 22–180%) and anthesis (+ 73–165%) and continuing through to harvest (+ 30–172%). Application of unamended urea significantly (P < 0.05) increased crop N uptake at mid-tillering compared with DMPP amended urea and increased N uptake at anthesis compared with application at GS30 in 2012 and 2014. It also increased above-ground biomass (+ 24–92%) and grain yield (+ 15–87%) across all years at harvest (Table 2) with significant interactive effects observed between year and treatment (P = 0.018 and < 0.001 respectively). Highest biomass and grain yields were observed in 2012 and 2013; in 2012 biomass and grain yield were significantly higher (P < 0.05) for the 50 N DMPP treatment than all others, while in 2013 all fertilised treatments resulted in similar yield and biomass with the exception of 0:50 N which yielded significantly (P < 0.05) less than 0:50 N NBPT. This is in contrast with 2014 when applying N at sowing resulted in a significant increase (P < 0.05) in biomass and a trend towards higher grain yield when compared to application at the end of tillering.
Table 2

Crop N uptake, above ground biomass, grain yield and physiological efficiency in response to treatment at Taylors Lake in 2012 and 2013 and at Horsham in 2014

Treatment

Total N uptake at mid-tillering (kg/ha)^

Total N uptake at anthesis (kg/ha)^

N uptake from soil at harvest (kg/ha)

N uptake from fertiliser at harvest (kg/ha)

Total N uptake at harvest (kg/ha)

Biomass (kg/ha)

Grain yield (kg/ha)

Fertiliser N harvest index (%)

Physiological efficiency# (kg/kg)

2012

 0 N

15b

37c

47b

47c

7446c

2456c

 50 N

30a

73a

45b

24a

69b

10473b

3501b

69b

42

 50 N DMPP

20b

67ab

63a

26a

89a

12532a

4589a

70b

82

 0:50 N

61b

59a

28a

87a

10251b

3940b

75a

54

 0:50 N NBPT

58b

47b

26a

73b

9466b

3672b

76a

53

2013

 0 N

18

55b

65c

65b

8412b

3281c

 50 N

22

101a

68bc

16c

84b

10818a

4480ab

71

64

 50 N DMPP

22

95a

73abc

18c

91b

11243a

4625ab

73

73

 0:50 N

102a

77ab

24b

101a

10398a

4177b

71

33

 0:50 N NBPT

91a

82a

28a

109a

11054a

4651a

76

46

2014

 0 N

10c

23b

25c

25c

3133b

1467c

 50 N

28a

56a

41ab

21a

62a

5839a

2046ab

70b

28

 50 N DMPP

23b

61a

45a

22a

67a

6010a

2194a

70b

33

 0:50 N

26b

32bc

6b

38b

3961b

1687bc

87a

29

 0:50 N NBPT

32b

31bc

8b

38b

3985b

1825abc

91a

50

 *LSD (P < 0.05) year × treatment

5.2

11.9

11.9

3.5

12.2

1223

462

6.2

n.s.

Treatment means within a given year with the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05)

ns no statistically significant interaction between year and treatment (P < 0.05)

^Data collected from main experimental plots. All other data collected at harvest from 15N microplots

#Physiological efficiency = (yield − yield of 0 N control) ÷ N uptake from fertiliser (Dobermann 2007)

*When comparing means within the same year

For fertilised treatments, biomass and grain yield were significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with total N uptake (r = 0.85 and r = 0.86 respectively). Application of DMPP treated urea at sowing or unamended urea at GS30 significantly (P < 0.05) increased uptake of soil N (+ 25–34%) compared to the unfertilised control in 2012. Similar observations were made where N was applied at GS30 in 2013 (+ 19–26%) and where urea was applied at sowing in 2014 (+ 65–84%). The proportion of N derived from fertiliser (data not shown) across all fertilised treatments ranged from 16 to 35% and showed no significant (P > 0.05) correlation with grain yield across all years. There was a trend (P = 0.11) towards higher PE of applied N with the addition of DMPP compared to unamended urea applied at sowing; 63 kg/kg cf. 45 kg/kg, but differences in PE due to treatment were otherwise limited.

Recovery of applied N

Total recovery (crop + soil) of applied N was significantly affected by an interaction of treatment and year (year × treatment: P = 0.002). Applying unamended urea at GS30 significantly (P < 0.05) increased total recovery (Fig. 3) by 11–38% compared with application at sowing (50 N) in 2012 and 2013 although there was no difference in 2014. Application of DMPP in 2013 and NBPT in 2014 significantly (P < 0.05) increased total recovery by 31% and 19% respectively, compared with unamended urea applied at the same time. Across the entire dataset, total recovery was significantly correlated (P < 0.001, r = 0.55) with REc, however this relationship changed between years. In 2012 a significant correlation (P < 0.05) was observed between total recovery and both soil recovery efficiency (REs) and REc with the highest correlation observed for REs (r = 0.70 cf. r = 0.54). In 2013, total recovery was more highly correlated with REc than REs (r = 0.86 cf. r = 0.57) and in 2014 total recovery was only significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with REs (r = 0.52).
Fig. 3

Recovery (%) of applied N at harvest in grain, straw, aboveground biomass (crop), soil (0–0.2 m) and in total (sum of crop and soil) in relation to N fertiliser treatment at Taylors Lake in 2012 and 2013 and Horsham in 2014. Error bars represent least significant (P < 0.05) differences for each variable when comparing treatments within a given year

Recovery of applied N by the crop, was highest in 2012 and 2013, averaging 52% and 43% respectively compared with 28% in 2014. In-season application of unamended urea significantly (P < 0.05) increased REc in 2013 and decreased REc in 2014 compared to application at sowing (+ 46% and − 71% respectively). Application of NBPT amended urea at GS30 significantly increased REc in 2013 (+ 18%) compared to unamended urea. Changes in REc were significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with recovery in both the grain and straw. Applying N at GS30 significantly (P < 0.05) increased fertiliser N harvest index (Table 2) compared to application at sowing in 2012 and 2014. In 2012, 69% of the fertiliser N taken up by the crop was recovered in grain when applied at sowing compared with 75% at GS30 and in 2014 this relationship was stronger; increasing from 70 at sowing to 87% at GS30.

Movement of fertiliser derived N through the soil profile (as indicated by recovery at depths of 0–0.1 m and 0.1–0.2 m) varied significantly depending on year and treatment (P = < 0.001 and 0.001 respectively, Table 3). Fertiliser recovery at a depth of 0–0.1 m increased by 175% when unamended urea was applied at GS30 compared with sowing in 2014. Application of DMPP at sowing in 2013 and NBPT at GS30 in 2014 also significantly (P < 0.05) increased N recovery (+ 58% and + 20% respectively) at a depth of 0–0.1 m compared with unamended urea applied at the same time. Application of unamended urea at GS30 significantly (P < 0.05) reduced fertiliser recovery at 0.1–0.2 m compared to application at sowing in both 2012 (− 72%) and 2014 (− 59%) whereas application of DMPP at sowing only reduced recovery in 2014 (− 32%) compared to unamended urea.
Table 3

Recovery of applied N in soil at depths of 0–0.1 m and 0.1–0.2 m and atom % 15N of soil at a depth of 0.2–0.4 m at Taylors Lake in 2012 and 2013 and Horsham in 2014

Year

Treatment

Recovery in soil (0–0.1 m)

Recovery in soil (0.1–0.2 m)

Atom % 15N soil (0.2–0.4 m) (%)

2012

0 N

0.369

 

50 N

22.4%ab

5.9%a

0.386

 

50 N DMPP

17.6%b

5.9%a

0.378

 

0:50 N

27.8%a

1.6%b

0.372

 

0:50 N NBPT

27.8%a

1.6%b

0.374

2013

0 N

0.367

 

50 N

20.1%b

5.2%b

0.384

 

50 N DMPP

31.8%a

6.9%a

0.380

 

0:50 N

25.0%ab

5.7%ab

0.375

 

0:50 N NBPT

26.8%ab

4.8%b

0.377

2014

0 N

0.369

 

50 N

18.5%c

5.5%a

0.375

 

50 N DMPP

23.1%c

3.8%b

0.375

 

0:50 N

50.8%b

2.3%bc

0.371

 

0:50 N NBPT

61.0%a

1.6%c

0.372

*LSD (P < 0.05) year × treatment

 

7.9%

1.7%

n.s.

Treatment means within a given year with the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05)

*When comparing means within the same year

Across all years, application of N resulted in significant (P < 0.05) increases in soil atom % 15N at a depth of 0.2–0.4 m compared to the unfertilised control indicating movement of fertiliser N to this depth. Addition of DMPP at sowing or application of unamended urea at GS30 significantly reduced atom % 15N at a depth of 0.2–0.4 m compared with unamended urea applied at sowing. A trend (P = 0.05) towards interactive effects of year and treatment on atom % 15N at 0.2–0.4 m was also observed (Table 3). In 2012 and 2013 applying DMPP amended urea at sowing or unamended urea at GS30 reduced atom % 15N at 0.2–0.4 m (1–2% and 2–4% respectively) compared with unamended urea at sowing, however this did not occur in 2014.

Effect of fertiliser management on nitrogen use efficiency

Agronomic efficiency of N application varied significantly (P < 0.01) with an interaction between year and treatment (Table 4). In 2012, application of unamended urea at GS30 and the use of DMPP at sowing, significantly (P < 0.05) increased AE (+ 44% and + 107% respectively) compared with unamended urea applied at sowing. In 2013, application of NBPT increased AE (+ 59%) compared with unamended urea applied at GS30 while there was an insignificant trend towards reduced AE from application of N at GS30 in 2014. Changes in AE were strongly, positively related to changes in PE (Fig. 4, P < 0.001, Slope = 0.33, R2 = 0.68), but less so with changes in REc (P < 0.001, Slope = 0.50, R2 = 0.25), while a weak negative relationship was observed between AE and REs (P < 0.001, Slope = − 0.52, R2 = 0.18). There was no significant relationship between AE and total recovery of applied N (P = 0.13).
Table 4

Agronomic efficiency (kg/kg) of N fertiliser application at Taylors Lake in 2012 and 2013 and Horsham in 2014

Treatment

2012

2013

2014

50 N

20.5c

22.2ab

11.6ab

50 N DMPP

42.5a

25.1a

14.5a

0:50 N

29.5b

16.2b

4.4b

0:50 N NBPT

24.1bc

25.6a

7.4ab

*Treatment means within a given year with the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05), LSD (year × treatment) = 8.6 kg/kg

Agronomic efficiency = (yield − yield of 0 N control) ÷ N application rate (Dobermann 2007)

*When comparing means within the same year

Fig. 4

Relationship between agronomic efficiency of N fertiliser application (kg/kg) and recovery of applied N (%) in crop (a), soil (b), total (c), physiological efficiency (d) of N fertiliser application (kg/kg). Solid lines represent the result of linear regression between the two factors

Discussion

Uptake of fertiliser N and crop response were affected by management and season

Uptake of fertiliser N generally ranged from 40 to 60% of the N applied which is at the higher end of similar studies (Abdel Monem et al. 2010; Armstrong et al. 1998; Corbeels et al. 1999; Kirda et al. 2001; Pilbeam et al. 1997). However, lower uptake of fertiliser N was observed when N was applied at sowing in 2013 or at GS30 in 2014 (Table 2); likely related to soil conditions following application. In 2013, applying N at sowing coincided with wet winter conditions (Fig. 2) conducive to N loss from denitrification (Barton et al. 1999; Parton et al. 1996) at a time when crop demand for N was low (Angus 2001). Conversely in 2014, N application at GS30 was followed by minimal rainfall for an extended period (7.8 mm over 20 days), potentially slowing ammonification (Savant et al. 1987), reducing mobility (Fenn and Miyamoto 1981) and availability (Dunbabin et al. 2009) of applied N and increasing the risk of ammonia (NH3) volatilisation (Pan et al. 2016a; Turner et al. 2012).

Depending on the season and management, fertiliser application also resulted in a significant added nitrogen interaction (ANI) which can be associated with increased mineralisation of soil organic N and/or crop effects such as stimulation of root growth increasing exploitation of soil reserves (Liu et al. 2017). ANI effects were observed where urea was applied at sowing in 2014 and at GS30 in 2012 and 2013. However, it is uncertain whether the ANI observed for N applied at GS30 was due to a true ANI or the lack of fertiliser N early in the season, resulting in greater exploitation of soil N. The reduced N uptake observed at mid-tillering and anthesis suggest the later cause in 2012 (Table 2). Conversely, in 2014 urea application at GS30 did not increase soil N uptake, presumably due to reduced availability and low uptake of fertiliser N applied at GS30. A significant ANI and a reduction in N uptake at mid-tillering was also observed where DMPP amended urea was applied at sowing in 2012; suggesting that the use of DMPP may have slowed crop uptake of applied N. Previous studies have shown that banded urea can produce localised ammonium concentrations that inhibit root growth (Pan et al. 2016b; Passioura and Wetselaar 1972; Wetselaar et al. 1972). In the current study, the addition of DMPP may have maintained N in the ammonium form and inhibited root access to fertiliser N, forcing greater exploitation of soil N similar to delaying application until GS30 in 2012.

Fertiliser addition and the corresponding increases in crop N uptake consistently lead to increased biomass and grain yield, although the magnitude of response varied with season and management. In 2012 and 2013, delaying N application until GS30 affected neither biomass nor grain yield. Delaying fertiliser application from sowing until GS30 coincides with increased growth rates, N demand (Limaux et al. 1999) and root mass (Shi et al. 2012; Tran and Tremblay 2000), likely resulting in the observed increases in REc. Previous studies have shown that delaying N application from sowing until GS30 can have limited effect on grain yield (Fischer et al. 1993; López-Bellido et al. 2005) while others have showed that early N deficiency (prior to GS30) can stimulate grain yield (Ravier et al. 2017). However, delaying N application until GS30 in 2014 significantly reduced shoot biomass and there was a trend towards lower grain yield, reiterating the importance of considering soil conditions following application and its effect on availability and loss of applied N.

The use of inhibitors rarely produced significant increases in grain yield; the exceptions were applying DMPP treated urea at sowing in 2012 and NBPT treated urea at GS30 in 2013 (Table 2). However, there was a trend towards increased REc (+ 9%), N uptake (+ 9%) and yield (+ 5%) from the use of DMPP treated urea at sowing in 2013 and 2014 compared with unamended urea. These findings are similar to a meta-analysis by Abalos et al. (2014) which showed that use of DMPP or NBPT increased REc by 8% and 12% respectively and increased productivity by between 1 and 10% across a range of crops and environments. However, it should be noted that the relative benefit of using inhibitors is likely to be higher in treatments receiving sub-optimal rates of N fertiliser (Rose et al. 2018). In the current study, peak grain yield across the broader experimental site generally occurred at a rate of 50 kg N/ha applied at sowing; the exception was in 2012 when this increased to 100 kg N/ha coinciding with a significant yield benefit from addition of DMPP to urea at sowing.

Loss of fertiliser N can be significant depending on management and season

The current study indicated that loss of fertiliser N from rain-fed wheat, grown in a semi-arid environment ranged between 13 and 42%, which aligns with similar studies (Angus and Grace 2017; Chen et al. 2008; Hancock et al. 2011; Patra et al. 1996; Pilbeam et al. 1997) and varied with an interaction of management and season. Highest loss of fertiliser N (42%) was recorded where unamended urea was applied at sowing in 2013. This was probably due to denitrification as significant volatilisation was unlikely due to the depth of application (Rochette et al. 2013). There was also limited evidence for movement of applied N to depths below 0.2 m (Table 3), supporting previous studies which also indicate low risk of leaching in similar environments and soils (Di and Cameron 2002; Poss et al. 1995). Furthermore, elevated soil WFPS conducive to denitrification (Granli and Bøckman 1994) was measured during winter and early spring 2013 resulting in elevated nitrous oxide emissions from the same treatment (Wallace et al. 2018). While the quantity of N lost via N2O flux was minor, previous studies have shown that N2:N2O ratios can be high depending on soil type and WFPS (Friedl et al. 2016; Weier et al. 1993).

In 2012 and 2013 total recovery of fertiliser N was higher when applied at GS30 rather than at sowing (Fig. 3), avoiding denitrification earlier in the season and coinciding with high crop N demand. These findings were similar to those of Kirda et al. (2001) and Harris et al. (2016) but in contrast with those of Hancock et al. (2011) where the risk of early season denitrification was negligible, but the risk of volatilisation of N applied in-season increased due to insufficient rainfall. The amount of rainfall required to mitigate volatilisation losses varies with soil texture, pH and initial soil moisture levels (Fillery and Khimashia 2016). Volatilisation loss can also be influenced by urea formulation (liquid cf. granular), however such effects are also dependent on soil and environmental conditions at and following application (Titko et al. 1987; Watson et al. 1992). In this environment and on a similar soil type, Turner et al. (2012) measured volatilisation losses of 13–23% of the N applied over 15–18 days when post application rainfall was limited. In the current study, rainfall in the 10 days following N application was 17 mm and total fertiliser loss was 15% in 2012. While in 2013 40 mm of rainfall was received in the 10 days prior to application and 23 mm in the 10 days following; increasing soil WFPS and the likelihood of denitrification, but reducing volatilisation risk, resulting in fertiliser N loss of 20%.

Adding DMPP to urea applied at sowing in 2013 increased total recovery (+ 31%) compared to unamended urea; similar to Harris et al. (2016) in an environment where fertiliser N loss was high (poorly drained chromosol, high rainfall), but in contrast to De Antoni et al. (2014) where loss was minimal (well-drained oxisol, subtropical environment). Despite exhibiting similar soil WFPS to 2013, adding DMPP did not increase total recovery in 2012. Partitioning between crop and soil sinks indicates that REc of N applied at sowing was lower in 2013 (32–37%) than in 2012 (49–52%), increasing the proportion of fertiliser N susceptible to denitrification which may have resulted in the observed benefit from DMPP addition. Adding NBPT to urea applied at GS30 increased total recovery of applied N in 2013 (+ 10%) and 2014 (+ 19%) compared to unamended urea. While NBPT has been shown to slow ammonification (Turner et al. 2010) and reduce volatilisation loss (Sanz-Cobena et al. 2012; Suter et al. 2011), these findings contrast with those of Zhang et al. (2010) and Abdel Monem et al. (2010) which showed limited scope to reduce N loss through use of urease inhibitors. In the current study it is likely that addition of NBPT reduced the potential for denitrification following application (Abalos et al. 2012). Conversely, in 2014 rainfall following fertiliser application at GS30 was low (8 mm in the 20 days post application) and combined with dry soil conditions at application (θv ≈ 24%, 0–0.05 m) it is possible that applying urea in solution may have increased the risk of ammonia volatilisation compared with a granular formulation, leading to the observed reduction in N loss following addition of NBPT.

Implications for fertiliser management in dryland, semi-arid cropping systems

The current study indicates that loss of fertiliser N and AE in this environment and soil type varies markedly depending on fertiliser management and seasonal conditions. Given the low predictability of seasonal conditions in this environment (Hayman et al. 2007), making widely applicable recommendations to mitigate N loss and improve productivity is difficult. While increases in AE can be attributed to increased REc or increased PE, in the current study AE was more strongly related to PE than REc (Fig. 4), in contrast with Bell et al. (2015) and Doyle and Holford (1993) which highlighted the importance of fertiliser REc to AE. However, these studies were conducted in northern (sub-tropical) Australia where long-term cereal cultivation has been linked to declining soil N reserves (Dalal and Mayer 1986), increasing reliance on fertiliser N to achieve basic crop productivity levels. Whereas in the Victorian Wimmera, greater use of N2 fixing grain legumes has partially buffered against long-term declines in soil N supplies (Armstrong et al. 2018) and the proportion of crop N uptake derived from fertiliser in the current study was low (a range of 16–35%) resulting in the observed disconnection between REc of fertiliser N and AE.

In addition to considering fertiliser management in a tactical context, growers must also consider longer term N dynamics. The current study showed the potential for significant carry-over (53–62%) of applied N where crop uptake was low due to dry seasonal conditions, such as occurred in 2014 (Fig. 3). While the availability of this unused N to the subsequent crop is dependent on immobilisation, mineralisation and loss processes, it has been shown that where drought hinders crop uptake in the year of application, up to 29% of the applied N can remain available to the following crop (Feigenbaum et al. 1984). An international review by Smith and Chalk (2018) indicated that across a range of environmental conditions this figure tends to be low (< 11%) in the first crop after application and decreases over time. Nonetheless, over the long-term, repeated carryover of unused N could help to maintain higher soil total N levels, resulting in enhanced supply of soil mineral N thereby making a return on fertiliser investments made in poor seasons.

Conclusion

This study has shown that application of fertiliser N is vital to the productivity of rainfed wheat in a semi-arid environment, even in years where rainfall is limited, but losses can be significant (up to 42% of the N applied). Deferring fertiliser application until GS30 significantly reduced fertiliser N loss in situations where rainfall occurred following application. However, when rainfall following application was limited, a large proportion of the fertiliser N remained in the soil and yield response tended to be lower. The use of nitrification or urease inhibitors also showed potential to reduce loss of applied N and in some cases, improve productivity. However, this effect was not consistent, making it difficult to predict best management practices in a highly variable climate. This observation may be related to the N rates tested, which were often at the upper end of the N response curve. The practical use of inhibitors in similar semi-arid environments also requires careful consideration of their cost in comparison to potential productivity increases.

While all of the wheat crops tested were highly responsive to N application, the majority of crop N uptake was sourced from the soil (65–84%). As a result, REc of applied N was not strongly related to increases in grain yield. We suggest that while loss of fertiliser N can be reduced through manipulating excess mineral N supply (either by timing of application or use of inhibitors), further improvements in coupling REc of fertiliser N with grain yield may be achieved through synchronising N supply to the timing of crop N demand. To achieve this, a better understanding of the dynamics of soil N supply must be coupled with knowledge of crop N demand at a given point in the season. While the current study considered both timing and use of inhibitors, optimising N placement (for example deep, mid-row or side banding) may also offer opportunity to improve crop NUE and reduce losses of fertiliser N to the environment.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Victorian Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions, the Grains Research and Development Corporation and the Commonwealth Department of Agriculture and Water Resources through the ‘Filling the Research Gap’ NANORP program. The authors wish to thank Keith Fischer and family of Taylors Lake for hosting trials over multiple years and Katherine Dunsford for helpful discussions during the development of the manuscript. They also wish to acknowledge the dedicated technical assistance provided by Jen Briggs, Mel Munn, Liana Warren and Roger Perris and Incitec Pivot Pty Ltd for supplying inhibitor treated fertilisers for these experiments.

References

  1. Abalos D, Sanz-Cobena A, Misselbrook T, Vallejo A (2012) Effectiveness of urease inhibition on the abatement of ammonia, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions in a non-irrigated Mediterranean barley field. Chemosphere 89:310–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abalos D, Jeffery S, Sanz-Cobena A, Guardia G, Vallejo A (2014) Meta-analysis of the effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. Agr Ecosyst Environ 189:136–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdel Monem M, Lindsay WL, Sommer R, Ryan J (2010) Loss of nitrogen from urea applied to rainfed wheat in varying rainfall zones in northern Syria. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 86:357–366.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-009-9297-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angus JF (2001) Nitrogen supply and demand in Australian agriculture. Aust J Exp Agric 41:277–288.  https://doi.org/10.1071/EA00141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angus JF, Grace PR (2017) Nitrogen balance in Australia and nitrogen use efficiency on Australian farms. Soil Res 55:435–450.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR16325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armstrong RD, McCosker K, Millar G, Probert ME (1998) Fluxes of nitrogen derived from plant residues and fertiliser on a cracking clay in a semi-arid environment. Aust J Agric Res 49:437–450.  https://doi.org/10.1071/A97069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armstrong RD, Perris R, Munn M, Dunsford K, Robertson F, Hollaway GJ, Leary GJO (2018) Effects of long-term rotation and tillage practice on grain yield and protein of wheat and soil fertility on a Vertosol in a medium-rainfall temperate environment. Crop Pasture Sci 70:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1071/CP17437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton L, McLay CDA, Schipper LA, Smith CT (1999) Annual denitrification rates in agricultural and forest soils: a review. Soil Res 37:1073–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR99009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bell M, Lester D, De Antoni MM, Rowlings D, Grace P (2015) Nitrogen use efficiency in summer sorghum grown on clay soils. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australian agronomy conference, HobartGoogle Scholar
  10. Bureau of Meteorology (2017) Climate data online. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data. Accessed 9 Feb 2017
  11. Cameron KC, Di HJ, Moir JL (2013) Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review. Ann Appl Biol 162:145–173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen D, Suter H, Islam A, Edis R, Freney JR, Walker CN (2008) Prospects of improving efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen in Australian agriculture: a review of enhanced efficiency fertilisers. Soil Res 46:289–301.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corbeels M, Hofman G, Van Cleemput O (1999) Fate of fertiliser N applied to winter wheat growing on a Vertisol in a Mediterranean environment. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 53:249–258.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009780703738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalal R, Mayer R (1986) Long term trends in fertility of soils under continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in southern Queensland. V. Rate of loss of total nitrogen from the soil profile and changes in carbon: nitrogen ratios. Soil Res 24:493–504.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9860493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Antoni Migliorati M, Bell MJ, Grace PR, Rowlings DW, Scheer C, Strazzabosco A (2014) Assessing agronomic and environmental implications of different N fertilisation strategies in subtropical grain cropping systems on Oxisols. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 100:369–382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9655-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di H, Cameron K (2002) Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 64:237–256.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021471531188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dobermann A (2007) Nutrient use efficiency—measurement and management. International Fertilizer Industry Association, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  18. Doyle A, Holford I (1993) The uptake of nitrogen by wheat, its agronomic efficiency and their relationship to soil and fertilizer nitrogen. Aust J Agric Res 44:1245–1258.  https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9931245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunbabin VM, Armstrong RD, Officer SJ, Norton RM (2009) Identifying fertiliser management strategies to maximise nitrogen and phosphorus acquisition by wheat in two contrasting soils from Victoria, Australia. Soil Res 47:74–90.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR08107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feigenbaum S, Seligman NG, Benjamin RW (1984) Fate of nitrogen-15 applied to spring wheat grown for three consecutive years in a semiarid region 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:838–843.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800040028x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fenn LB, Miyamoto S (1981) Ammonia loss and associated reactions of urea in calcareous soils 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:537–540.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500030020x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fillery IRP, Khimashia N (2016) Procedure to estimate ammonia loss after N fertiliser application to moist soil. Soil Res 54:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR14073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer RA, Howe GN, Ibrahim Z (1993) Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertilizer. I. Grain yield and protein content. Field Crops Res 33:37–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90093-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freney JR, Smith CJ, Mosier AR (1992) Effect of a new nitrification inhibitor (wax coated calcium carbide) on transformations and recovery of fertilizer nitrogen by irrigated wheat. Fertil Res 32:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01054388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friedl J, Scheer C, Rowlings DW, McIntosh HV, Strazzabosco A, Warner DI, Grace PR (2016) Denitrification losses from an intensively managed sub-tropical pasture - impact of soil moisture on the partitioning of N2 and N2O emissions. Soil Biol Biochem 92:58–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Friedl J, Scheer C, Rowlings DW, Mumford MT, Grace PR (2017) The nitrification inhibitor DMPP (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate) reduces N2 emissions from intensively managed pastures in subtropical Australia. Soil Biol Biochem 108:55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gardner JB, Drinkwater LE (2009) The fate of nitrogen in grain cropping systems: a meta-analysis of 15N field experiments. Ecol Appl 19:2167–2184.  https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1122.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Granli T, Bøckman OC (1994) Nitrous oxide from agriculture. Nor J Agric Sci Suppl 12:7–128Google Scholar
  29. Hancock JM, McNeill AM, McDonald GK, Holloway RE (2011) Fate of fertiliser N applied to wheat on a coarse textured highly calcareous soil under simulated semi-arid conditions. Plant Soil 348:139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0917-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris RH, Armstrong RD, Wallace AJ, Belyaeva ON (2016) Delaying nitrogen fertiliser application improves wheat 15N recovery from high rainfall cropping soils in south eastern Australia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 106:113–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9792-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayman P, Crean J, Mullen J, Parton K (2007) How do probabilistic seasonal climate forecasts compare with other innovations that Australian farmers are encouraged to adopt? Aust J Agric Res 58:975–984.  https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Isbell R (2002) The Australian soil classification, vol 4. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirda C, Derici MR, Schepers JS (2001) Yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of rainfed wheat growing in the Mediterranean region. Field Crops Res 71:113–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00153-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Limaux F, Recous S, Meynard J-M, Guckert A (1999) Relationship between rate of crop growth at date of fertiliser N application and fate of fertiliser N applied to winter wheat. Plant Soil 214:49–59.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004629511235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Linn DM, Doran JW (1984) Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nontilled soils 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1267–1272.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800060013x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu X-JA, van Groenigen KJ, Dijkstra P, Hungate BA (2017) Increased plant uptake of native soil nitrogen following fertilizer addition—Not a priming effect? Appl Soil Ecol 114:105–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. López-Bellido L, López-Bellido RJ, Redondo R (2005) Nitrogen efficiency in wheat under rainfed Mediterranean conditions as affected by split nitrogen application. Field Crops Res 94:86–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malhi S, Johnston A, Gill K, Pennock D (2004) Landscape position effects on the recovery of 15N-labelled urea applied to wheat on two soils in Saskatchewan, Canada. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 68:85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000012238.02635.7e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonald G (1989) The contribution of nitrogen fertiliser to the nitrogen nutrition of rainfed wheat crops in Australia: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 29:455–481.  https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9890455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pan B, Lam SK, Mosier A, Luo Y, Chen D (2016a) Ammonia volatilization from synthetic fertilizers and its mitigation strategies: a global synthesis. Agr Ecosyst Environ 232:283–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pan WL, Madsen IJ, Bolton RP, Graves L, Sistrunk T (2016b) Ammonia/ammonium toxicity root symptoms induced by inorganic and organic fertilizers and placement. Agron J 108:2485–2492.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.02.0122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parton WJ, Mosier AR, Ojima DS, Valentine DW, Schimel DS, Weier K, Kulmala AE (1996) Generalized model for N2 and N2O production from nitrification and denitrification. Global Biogeochem Cycles 10:401–412.  https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB01455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Passioura JB, Wetselaar R (1972) Consequences of banding nitrogen fertilizers in soil. Plant Soil 36:461–473.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01373498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Patra AK, Burford JR, Rego TJ (1996) Volatilization losses of surface-applied urea nitrogen from Vertisols in the Indian semi-arid tropics. Biol Fertil Soils 22:345–349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00334581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Payne R, Murray D, Harding S, Baird D, Soutar D (2014) GenStat for windows (17th edition) introduction. VSN International, Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
  46. Pilbeam CJ, McNeill AM, Harris HC, Swift RS (1997) Effect of fertilizer rate and form on the recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to wheat in Syria. J Agric Sci 128:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poss R, Smith CJ, Dunin FX, Angus JF (1995) Rate of soil acidification under wheat in a semi-arid environment. Plant Soil 177:85–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00010340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ravier C, Meynard J-M, Cohan J-P, Gate P, Jeuffroy M-H (2017) Early nitrogen deficiencies favor high yield, grain protein content and N use efficiency in wheat. Eur J Agron 89:16–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rochette P, Angers DA, Chantigny MH, Gasser M-O, MacDonald JD, Pelster DE, Bertrand N (2013) Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen retention: How deep to incorporate urea? J Environ Qual 42:1635–1642.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.05.0192 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rose TJ, Wood RH, Rose MT, Van Zwieten L (2018) A re-evaluation of the agronomic effectiveness of the nitrification inhibitors DCD and DMPP and the urease inhibitor NBPT. Agr Ecosyst Environ 252:69–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sanz-Cobena A, Sánchez-Martín L, García-Torres L, Vallejo A (2012) Gaseous emissions of N2O and NO and NO3 leaching from urea applied with urease and nitrification inhibitors to a maize (Zea mays) crop. Agr Ecosyst Environ 149:64–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Savant N, James A, McClellan G (1987) Effect of amounts and sequence of additions of urea and water on hydrolysis of surface-applied granular urea in unsaturated soils. Fertil Res 11:231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01063320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shi Z, Jing Q, Cai J, Jiang D, Cao W, Dai T (2012) The fates of 15N fertilizer in relation to root distributions of winter wheat under different N splits. Eur J Agron 40:86–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith CJ, Chalk PM (2018) The residual value of fertiliser N in crop sequences: an appraisal of 60 years of research using 15N tracer. Field Crops Res 217:66–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suter HC, Pengthamkeerati P, Walker C, Chen D (2011) Influence of temperature and soil type on inhibition of urea hydrolysis by N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide in wheat and pasture soils in south-eastern Australia. Soil Res 49:315–319.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR10243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Titko S, Street JR, Logan TJ (1987) Volatilization of ammonia from granular and dissolved urea applied to turf grass 1. Agron J 79:535–540.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900030027x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tran TS, Tremblay G (2000) Recovery of 15N-labeled fertilizer by spring bread wheat at different N rates and application times. Can J Soil Sci 80:533–539.  https://doi.org/10.4141/S99-098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turner DA, Edis RB, Chen D, Freney JR, Denmead OT, Christie R (2010) Determination and mitigation of ammonia loss from urea applied to winter wheat with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphorictriamide. Agr Ecosyst Environ 137:261–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner DA, Edis RE, Chen D, Freney JR, Denmead OT (2012) Ammonia volatilization from nitrogen fertilizers applied to cereals in two cropping areas of southern Australia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 93:113–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-012-9504-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wallace AJ, Armstrong RD, Harris RH, Belyaeva ON, Grace PR, Partington DL, Scheer C (2018) Fertiliser timing and use of inhibitors to reduce N2O emissions of rainfed wheat in a semi-arid environment. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 112:231–252.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9941-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Watson CJ, Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ, Poland P (1992) Volatilization of ammonia from solid and liquid urea surface-applied to perennial ryegrass. J Agric Sci 119:223–226.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600014155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weier K, Doran J, Power J, Walters D (1993) Denitrification and the dinitrogen/nitrous oxide ratio as affected by soil water, available carbon, and nitrate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:66–72.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700010013x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weiske A, Benckiser G, Ottow JCG (2001) Effect of the new nitrification inhibitor DMPP in comparison to DCD on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and methane (CH4) oxidation during 3 years of repeated applications in field experiments. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 60:57–64.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012669500547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wetselaar R, Passioura JB, Singh BR (1972) Consequences of banding nitrogen fertilizers in soil. Plant Soil 36:159–175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01373466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xu X, Zhou L, Van Cleemput O, Wang Z (2000) Fate of urea-15N in a soil–wheat system as influenced by urease inhibitor hydroquinone and nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide. Plant Soil 220:261–270.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004715827085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yu Q, Chen Y, Ye X, Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Tian P (2007) Evaluation of nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethyl pyrazole phosphate on nitrogen leaching in undisturbed soil columns. Chemosphere 67:872–878.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang L et al (2010) Fate of applied urea 15N in a soil–maize system as affected by urease inhibitor and nitrification inhibitor. Plant Soil Environ 56:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang X, Davidson EA, Mauzerall DL, Searchinger TD, Dumas P, Shen Y (2015) Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agriculture VictoriaHorshamAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Future EnvironmentsQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Agriculture VictoriaHamiltonAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Animal, Plant and Soil SciencesLaTrobe UniversityBundooraAustralia
  5. 5.Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)Garmisch-PartenkirchenGermany

Personalised recommendations