Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 107, Issue 1, pp 91–105 | Cite as

Stoichiometry of animal manure and implications for nutrient cycling and agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa

  • Gudeta W. SileshiEmail author
  • Nhamo Nhamo
  • Paramu L. Mafongoya
  • Joseph Tanimu
Article

Abstract

A number of studies have recommended application of large quantities of manure alone or in combination with inorganic fertilizer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, yield responses of cereals such as maize are very modest even at manure application rates exceeding 10 t ha−1 year−1. We conducted a meta-analysis of data from 64 studies across 14 countries in SSA in order to explore variability in nutrient concentrations, stoichiometry and maize yield responses to animal manure. We observed novel instances of stoichiometry and correlations between organic carbon (C), total nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations, and elemental ratios in manure. In 27% of the manure samples the C:N ratio was greater than 25 indicating that N will be potentially unavailable to crops due to net immobilization. In over 94% of the manure samples, the N:P and C:P ratios were <15 and <200 indicating net P mineralization. Therefore, decomposition rates and crop responses are likely to be N-limited rather than P-limited in the majority of the manure applied. Our analyses also demonstrate that manure application rates and N and P concentrations are less important than C:N and N:P ratios in determining maize yield response to manure. Therefore, emphasis in the future should not be on increasing manure application rates but on approaches that ensure favourable C:N and N:P ratios. Our findings also suggest the need for feeding animals with high quality diet to get better quality manure, higher crop yields and improve household food security in SSA.

Keywords

Carbon sequestration Greenhouse gases Maize yield 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10705_2016_9817_MOESM1_ESM.docx (50 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 49 kb)
10705_2016_9817_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (51 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 51 kb)

References

  1. Adamu UK, Mrema JP, Msaky JJ (2015) Growth response of maize (Zea mays L.) to different rates of nitrogen, phosphorus and farm yard manure in Morogoro Urban district, Tanzania. Am J Exp Agric 9:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell BM, Thornton P, Zougmoré R, van Asten P, Lipper L (2014) Sustainable intensification: what is its role in climate smart agriculture? Curr Opin Environ Sust 8:39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chakeredza S, Hove L, Akinnifesi FA, Franzel S, Ajayi O, Sileshi G (2007) Managing fodder trees as a solution to human–livestock food conflicts and their contribution to income generation for smallholder farmers in Southern Africa. Nat Resour Forum 31:286–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chikowo R, Corbeels M, Mapfumo P, Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, Giller KE (2010) Nitrogen and phosphorus capture and recovery efficiencies, and crop responses to a range of soil fertility management strategies in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 88:59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. du Prel JB, Hommel G, Röhrig B, Blettner M (2009) Confidence interval or P-value? Deut Ärzt Int 106:335–339Google Scholar
  6. Dunjana N, Nyamugafata P, Shumba A, Nyamangara J, Zingore S (2012) Effects of cattle manure on selected soil physical properties of smallholder farms on two soils of Murewa, Zimbabwe. Soil Use Manag 28:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eghball B, Wienhold BJ, Gilley JE, Eigenberg RA (2002) Mineralization of manure nutrients. J Soil Water Conserv 57:470–473Google Scholar
  8. Enríquez S, Duarte CM, Sandjensen K (1993) Patterns in decomposition rates among photosynthetic organisms—the importance of detritus C:N:P content. Oecologia 94:457–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EU (1991) Council Directive 91/676/EEC; http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-nitrates/index_-en.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2016
  10. Gachengo CN, Vanlauwe B, Palm CA, Cadisch G (2004) Chemical characterisation of a standard set of organic materials. In: Delve RJ, Probert ME (eds), Modelling nutrient management in tropical cropping systems. ACIAR Proceedings No. 114, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  11. Güsewell S, Gessner MO (2009) N: P ratios influence litter decomposition and colonization by fungi and bacteria in microcosms. Funct Ecol 23:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holechek JL, Cibils AF, Bengaly K, Kinyamario JI (2016) Human Population Growth, African Pastoralism, and Rangelands: a Perspective. Rangel Ecol Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2016.09.004 Google Scholar
  13. Ibrahim MA (2016) Impact of enclosure on plant species composition and biomass production in Ewa Woreda of Afar Region State, Ethiopia. J Biodivers Endanger Species 4:157Google Scholar
  14. Ibrahim A, Abaidoo RC, Fatondji D, Opoku A (2015) Hill placement of manure and fertilizer micro-dosing improves yield and water use efficiency in the Sahelian low input millet-based cropping system. Field Crops Res 180:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson HL, Mtengeti EJ (2005) Assessment of animal manure production, management and utilization in Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Livest Res Rural Dev 17 (10). http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/10/jack17110.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2016
  16. Kallah MS, Adamu AM (1989) The importance of animal faeces as fertilizer. In :Gefu JO, Adu IF, Lufadeju EA, Kallah MS, Awogbade MO (eds) Pastoralism in Nigeria: Past, Present and Future. Proceedings of the National Conference on Pastoralism in Nigeria, Shika-Zaria, Nigeria, 26–29 June 1988Google Scholar
  17. Keiblinger KM, Hall EK, Wanek W, Szukics U, Hämmerle I, Ellersdorfer G, Böck S, Strauss J, Sterflinger K, Richter A, Boltenstern SZ (2010) The effect of resource quantity and resource stoichiometry on microbial carbon-use-efficiency. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:430–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kihara J, Nziguheba G, Zingore S, Coulibaly A, Esilaba A, Kabambe V, Njoroge S, Palm C, Huising J (2016) Understanding variability in crop response to fertilizer and amendments in sub-Saharan Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 229:1–12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N: P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 33:1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lekasi JK, Tanner JC, Kimani SK, Harris PJC (2003) Cattle manure quality in Maragua District, Central Kenya: effect of management practices and development of simple methods of assessment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu J, Liangzhi Y, Amini M, Obersteiner M, Herrero M, Zehnder AJB (2010) A high-resolution assessment on global nitrogen flows in cropland. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107:8035–8040CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. MacDonald GK, Bennett EM, Potter PA, Ramankutty N (2011) Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world’s croplands. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 108:3086–3091CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Mafongoya P, Rusinamhodzi L, Siziba S, Thierfelder C, Mvumi BM, Nhau B, Hove L, Chivenge P (2016) Maize productivity and profitability in Conservation Agriculture systems across agro-ecological regions in Zimbabwe: a review of knowledge and practice. Agr Ecosyst Environ 220:211–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mapanda F, Wuta M, Nyamangara J, Rees RS (2011) Effects of organic and mineral fertilizer nitrogen on greenhouse gas emissions and plant-captured carbon under maize cropping in Zimbabwe. Plant Soil 343:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Masaka J, Wuta M, Nyamangara J, Mugabe FT (2013) Effect of manure quality on nitrate leaching and groundwater pollution in wetland soil under field tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill var. Heinz) rape (Brassica napus L var. Giant). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 96:149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mcgroddy ME, Daufresne T, Hedin LO (2004) Scaling of C: N: P stoichiometry in forests worldwide: implications of terrestrial Redfield-type ratios. Ecology 85:2390–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore PA, Daniel TC, Woods CW, Sharplay AN (1995) Poultry manure management. J Soil Water 50:321–327Google Scholar
  28. Mooshammer M, Wanek W, Hämmerle I, Fuchslueger L, Hofhans F, Knoltsch A et al (2014) Adjustment of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon: nitrogen imbalances regulate soil nitrogen cycling. Nat Commun 5:3694CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Nhamo N, Murwira HK, Giller KE (2004) The relationship between nitrogen mineralization patterns and quality indices of cattle manure from different smallholder farm in Zimbabwe. In: Bationo A (ed) Managing nutrient cycles to sustain soil fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa. Academy Science Publishers, Nairobi, pp 299–315Google Scholar
  30. Nyamangara N, Bergström LF, Piha MI, Giller KE (2003) Fertilizer use efficiency and nitrate leaching in a tropical sandy soil. J Environ Qual 32:599–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nziguheba G, Zingore S, Kihara J, Merckx R, Njoroge S, Otinga A, Vandamme A, Vanlauwe B (2016) Phosphorus in smallholder farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: implications for agricultural intensification. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104:321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palm CA (1995) Contribution of agroforestry trees to nutrient requirements of intercropped plants. Agrofor Syst 30:105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palm CA, Gachengo CN, Delve RJ, Cadisch G, Giller KE (2001) Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: application of an organic resource database. Agr Ecosyst Environ 83:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004) Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:11001–11006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Rusinamhodzi L, Corbeels M, Zingore S, Nyamangara J, Giller KE (2013) Pushing the envelope? Maize production intensification and the role of cattle manure in recovery of degraded soils in smallholder farming areas of Zimbabwe. Field Crops Res 147:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sileshi GW, Mafongoya PL, Akinnifesi FK, Phiri E, Chirwa P, Beedy T, Makumba W, Nyamadzawo G, Njoloma J, Wuta M, Nyamugafata P, and Jiri O (2014) Fertilizer trees. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 1, San Diego: Elsevier; pp 222–234Google Scholar
  37. Sitters J, Maechler M-J, Edwards PJ, Suter W, Venterink HO (2014) Interactions between C:N: P stoichiometry and soil macrofauna control dung decomposition of savanna herbivores. Funct Ecol 28:776–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snijders P, Onduru D, Wouters B, Gachimbi L, Zake J, Ebanyat P, Ergano K, Abduke M, van Keulen H (2009) Cattle manure management in East Africa: review of manure quality and nutrient losses and scenarios for cattle and manure management. Wageningen UR Livestock Research Report 258, pp 25Google Scholar
  39. Stevenson FJ, Cole MA (1999) Carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur, micronutrients. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Thornton PK, Herrero M (2010) Potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107:19667–19672CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Tilahun TF, Dechassa RN, Bayu W, Gebeyehu S (2013) Effect of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers on the growth, yield and moisture stress tolerance of rain-fed lowland rice. Am J Res Commun 4:275–301Google Scholar
  42. Tittonell P, Rufino MC, Janssen BH, Giller KE (2010) Carbon and nutrient losses during manure storage under traditional and improved practices in smallholder crop-livestock systems–evidence from Kenya. Plant Soil 328:253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. UN Millennium Project (2005) Halving hunger: it can be done. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Whalen JK, Chang C, Olson BM (2001) Nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization potentials of soils receiving repeated annual cattle manure applications. Biol Fertil Soils 34:334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zingore S, Delve RJ, Nyamangara J, Giller KE (2008) Multiple benefits of manure: the key to maintenance of soil fertility and restoration of depleted sandy soils on African smallholder farms. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 80:267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gudeta W. Sileshi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nhamo Nhamo
    • 2
  • Paramu L. Mafongoya
    • 3
  • Joseph Tanimu
    • 4
  1. 1.LusakaZambia
  2. 2.International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Southern Africa HubLusakaZambia
  3. 3.University of KwaZulu-NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa
  4. 4.Department of Soil Science and Land Resources ManagementFederal University WukariWukariNigeria

Personalised recommendations