Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 37–53 | Cite as

Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice and maize production in diversified rice cropping systems

  • Sebastian Weller
  • David Kraus
  • Kevin Ray P. Ayag
  • Reiner Wassmann
  • M. C. R. Alberto
  • Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
  • Ralf Kiese
Original Article

Abstract

Traditional irrigated double-rice cropping systems have to cope with reduced water availability due to changes of climate and economic conditions. To quantify the shift in CH4 and N2O emissions when changing from traditional to diversified double cropping-systems, an experiment including flooded rice, non-flooded “aerobic” rice and maize was conducted during the dry season (February–June 2012) in the Philippines. Two automated static chamber–GC systems were used to continuously measure CH4 and N2O emissions in the three cropping systems of which each included three different nitrogen fertilization regimes. Turning away from flooded cropping systems leads to shifts in greenhouse gas emissions from CH4 under wet soil to N2O emissions under drier soil conditions. The global warming potential (GWP) of the non-flooded crops was lower compared to flooded rice, whereas high CH4 emissions under flooded conditions still override enhanced N2O emissions in the upland systems. The yield-scaled GWP favored maize over aerobic rice, due to lower yields of aerobic rice. However, the lower GHG emissions of upland systems are only beneficial if they are not overwhelmed by enhanced losses of soil organic carbon.

Keywords

Methane Nitrous oxide Aerobic rice Maize Yield-scaled GWP 

Abbreviations

DAS

Days after seeding

GHG

Greenhouse gas

GWP

Global warming potential

GY

Grain yield

SOC

Soil organic carbon

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of the multidisciplinary research project ICON. We thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for its generous funding (FOR 1701, “Introducing Non-Flooded Crops in Rice-Dominated Landscapes: Impacts on Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Cycles [ICON]”, BU1173/13-1 and KI1413). Furthermore, we thank the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and especially the Crop and Environmental Sciences Division (CESD) for organizing the field management, providing facilities, and the support from the CESD staff as well as an anonymous reviewer for the very helpful suggestions.

References

  1. Abao EB, Bronson KF, Wassmann R, Singh U (2000) Simultaneous records of methane and nitrous oxide emissions in rice-based cropping systems under rainfed conditions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 58:131–139. doi: 10.1023/A:1009842502608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akiyama H, Yagi K, Yan XY (2005) Direct N2O emissions from rice paddy fields: summary of available data. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19:GB1005. doi: 10.1029/2004GB002378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberto MCR, Buresh RJ, Hirano T et al (2013) Carbon uptake and water productivity for dry-seeded rice and hybrid maize grown with overhead sprinkler irrigation. Field Crops Res 146:51–65. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angulo C, Becker M, Wassmann R (2012) Yield gap analysis and assessment of climate-induced yield trends of irrigated rice in selected provinces of the Philippines. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop 113:61–68Google Scholar
  5. Banger K, Tian H, Lu C (2012) Do nitrogen fertilizers stimulate or inhibit methane emissions from rice fields? Glob Change Biol 18:3259–3267. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02762.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belder P, Bouman BAM, Spiertz JHJ et al (2005) Crop performance, nitrogen and water use in flooded and aerobic rice. Plant Soil 273:167–182. doi: 10.1007/s11104-004-7401-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodelier PLE, Laanbroek HJ (2004) Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 47:265–277. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00304-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodelier PLE, Roslev P, Henckel T, Frenzel P (2000) Stimulation by ammonium-based fertilizers of methane oxidation in soil around rice roots. Nature 403:421–424. doi: 10.1038/35000193 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouman BAM (2001) Water-efficient management strategies in rice production. Int Rice Res Notes 26(2):17–22Google Scholar
  10. Bouman BAM, Peng S, Castañeda AR, Visperas RM (2005) Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agric Water Manag 74:87–105. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouman BAM, Humphreys E, Tuong TP, Barker R (2007) Rice and water. In: Sparks Donald L (ed) Adv. Agron. Academic Press, Waltham, pp 187–237Google Scholar
  12. Bronson KF, Neue HU, Singh U, Abao EB (1997a) Automated chamber measurements of methane and nitrous oxide flux in a flooded rice soil. 1. Residue, nitrogen, and water management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:981–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bronson KF, Singh U, Neue HU, Abao EB (1997b) Automated chamber measurements of methane and nitrous oxide flux in a flooded rice soil. 2. Fallow period emissions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:988–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butterbach-Bahl K, Papen H, Rennenberg H (1997) Impact of gas transport through rice cultivars on methane emission from rice paddy fields. Plant, Cell Environ 20:1175–1183. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-142.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cai ZC, Xing GX, Yan XY et al (1997) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy fields as affected by nitrogen fertilizers and water management. Plant Soil 196:7–14. doi: 10.1023/A:1004263405020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cassman KG, Gines GC, Dizon MA et al (1996) Nitrogen-use efficiency in tropical lowland rice systems: contributions from indigenous and applied nitrogen. Field Crops Res 47:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(95)00101-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng W, Sudo S, Tsuruta H et al (2006) Temporal and spatial variations in N2O emissions from a Chinese cabbage field as a function of type of fertilizer and application. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 74:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cicerone R, Shetter J (1981) Sources of atmospheric methane—measurements in rice paddies and a discussion. J Geophys Res Oceans Atmos 86:7203–7209. doi: 10.1029/JC086iC08p07203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corton TM, Bajita JB, Grospe FS et al (2000) Methane emission from irrigated and intensively managed rice fields in Central Luzon (Philippines). Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 58:37–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1009826131741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Denman KL, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A et al (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Dong H, Yao Z, Zheng X et al (2011) Effect of ammonium-based, non-sulfate fertilizers on CH4 emissions from a paddy field with a typical Chinese water management regime. Atmos Environ 45:1095–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engel R, Liang DL, Wallander R et al (2010) Influence of urea fertilizer placement on nitrous oxide production from a silt loam soil. J Environ Qual 39:115–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. FAOSTAT (2012) Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/site/291/default.aspx
  24. Halvorson AD, Del Grosso SJ (2013) Nitrogen placement and source effects on nitrous oxide emissions and yields of irrigated corn. J Environ Qual 42:312–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Seiler W (1986) Methane emissions during a cultivation period from an italian rice paddy. J Geophys Res Atmos 91:1803–1814. doi: 10.1029/JD091iD11p11803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA et al (1996) Climate change 1995: the science of climate change, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 572Google Scholar
  27. IFA (2012) International Fertilizer Industry Association—STATISTICS/HomePage/IFA. http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/HomePage/STATISTICS
  28. IPCC (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, HayamaGoogle Scholar
  29. IPCC (2007) Agriculture. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR et al (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation, contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 1535Google Scholar
  31. Khalil M, Shearer M (2006) Decreasing emission of methane from rice agriculture. Int Congr Ser 1293:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kraus D, Weller S, Klatt S et al (2014) A new LandscapeDNDC biogeochemical module to predict CH4 and N2O emissions from lowland rice and upland cropping systems. Plant Soil 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2255-x
  33. Kruger M, Frenzel P (2003) Effects of N-fertilisation on CH4 oxidation and production, and consequences for CH4 emissions from microcosms and rice fields. Glob Change Biol 9:773–784. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00576.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lafitte HR, Courtois B, Arraudeau M (2002) Genetic improvement of rice in aerobic systems: progress from yield to genes. Field Crops Res 75:171–190. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00025-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lehman RM, Osborne SL (2013) Greenhouse gas fluxes from no-till rotated corn in the upper midwest. Agric Ecosyst Environ 170:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liebig MA, Morgan JA, Reeder JD et al (2005) Greenhouse gas contributions and mitigation potential of agricultural practices in northwestern USA and western Canada. Soil Tillage Res 83:25–52. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Linquist B, van Groenigen KJ, Adviento-Borbe MA et al (2012) An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Glob Change Biol 18:194–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02502.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maclean JL, Dawe DC, Hardy B, Hettel GP (eds) (2002) Rice almanac: source book for the most important economic activity on earth, 3rd edn. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  39. Minamikawa K, Nishimura S, Sawamoto T, Nakajima Y, Yagi K (2010) Annual emissions of dissolved CO2, CH4, and N2O in the subsurface drainage from three cropping systems. Glob Change Biol 16:796–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01931.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Naser HM, Nagata O, Tamura S, Hatano R (2007) Methane emissions from five paddy fields with different amounts of rice straw application in central Hokkaido, Japan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53:95–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00105.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neue HU, Sass RL (1998) The budget of methane from rice fields. IGACtivities Newsl 12:3–11Google Scholar
  42. Nishimura S, Sawamoto T, Akiyama H, Sudo S, Cheng W, Yagi K (2005) Continuous, automated nitrous oxide measurements from paddy soils converted to upland crops. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1977–1986. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nishimura S, Akiyama H, Sudo S, Fumoto T, Cheng W, Yagi K (2011) Combined emission of CH4 and N2O from a paddy field was reduced by preceding upland crop cultivation. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 57:167–178. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2010.551346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pampolino MF, Larazo WM, Alberto MCR, Buresh RJ (2006) Carbon and nitrogen cycling under rice–maize cropping. A Paper Presented During the ASA–CSSA–SSSA International Annual Meetings, Indianapolis, USA, 12–16 Nov 2006Google Scholar
  45. Pampolino MF, Laureles EV, Gines HC, Buresh RJ (2008) Soil carbon and nitrogen changes in long-term continuous lowland rice cropping. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:798–807. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parkin T, Mosier A, Smith J, Ventera R, Johnson J, Reicosky D, Doyle G, McCarthy G, Baker J (2003) USDA-ARS GRACEnet Chamber-based Trace Gas Flux Measurement Protocol. afrsweb.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/person/31831/2003GRACEnetTraceGasProtocol.pdfGoogle Scholar
  47. PhilRice (2010) Climate change-ready rice varieties. http://pinoyrkb.com/main/resources/rice-varieties
  48. Rothfuss F, Conrad R (1992) Vertical profiles of CH4 concentrations, dissolved substrates and processes involved in CH4 production in a flooded italian rice field. Biogeochemistry 18:137–152. doi: 10.1007/BF00003274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sander BO, Wassmann R, Siopongco JDLC (2014) Water-saving techniques: potential, adoption and empirical evidence for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from rice production. In: Hoanh CT, Smakhtin V, Johnston T (eds) Climate change and agricultural water management in developing countries. CABI climate change series. CABI Publishing, UK in printGoogle Scholar
  50. Schimel J (2000) Global change–rice, microbes and methane. Nature 403:375. doi: 10.1038/35000325 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shang Q, Yang X, Gao C et al (2011) Net annual global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in Chinese double rice-cropping systems: a 3-year field measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments. Glob Change Biol 17:2196–2210. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02374.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Takahashi S, Uenosono S, Ono S (2003) Short- and long-term effects of rice straw application on nitrogen uptake by crops and nitrogen mineralization under flooded and upland conditions. Plant Soil 251:291–301. doi: 10.1023/A:1023006304935 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Timsina J, Jat ML, Majumdar K (2010) Rice–maize systems of South Asia: current status, future prospects and research priorities for nutrient management. Plant Soil 335:65–82. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0418-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tuong TP, Bouman BAM (2003) Rice production in water-scarce environments. In: Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden D (eds) Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement. CABI Publishing, UK, pp 53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van der Gon HAC, van Breemen N, Neue HU et al (1996) Release of entrapped methane from wetland rice fields upon soil drying. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 10:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wassmann R, Neue H, Lantin R et al (1994) Temporal patterns of methane emissions form wetland rice fields treated by different modes of N-application. J Geophys Res Atmos 99:16457–16462. doi: 10.1029/94JD00017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wassmann R, Buendia LV, Lantin RS et al (2000) Mechanisms of crop management impact on methane emissions from rice fields in Los Banos, Philippines. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 58:107–119. doi: 10.1023/A:1009838401699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whiting G, Chanton J (1993) Primary production control of methane emission from wetlands. Nature 364:794–795. doi: 10.1038/364794a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. WMO (2006) WMO greenhouse gas bulletin (GHG bulletin)—N°1: the state of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere using global observations up to December 2004Google Scholar
  60. Xie B, Zheng X, Zhou Z et al (2010) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on CH4 emission from rice fields: multi-site field observations. Plant Soil 326:393–401. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0020-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu ZJ, Zheng XH, Wang YS et al (2004) Effects of elevated CO2 and N fertilization on CH4 emissions from paddy rice fields. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18:GB3009. doi: 10.1029/2004GB002233 Google Scholar
  62. Yan X, Akiyama H, Yagi K, Akimoto H (2009) Global estimations of the inventory and mitigation potential of methane emissions from rice cultivation conducted using the 2006 intergovernmental panel on climate change guidelines. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 23:GB2002. doi: 10.1029/2008GB003299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yoshinori M, Kanno T (1997) Emissions of trace gases (CO2, CO, CH4, and N2O) resulting from rice straw burning. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 43:849–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zheng XH, Wang MX, Wang YS et al (2000) Mitigation options for methane, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from agricultural ecosystems. Adv Atmos Sci 17:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zheng X, Mei B, Wang Y et al (2008) Quantification of N2O fluxes from soil–plant systems may be biased by the applied gas chromatograph methodology. Plant Soil 311:211–234. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9673-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou M, Zhu B, Brüggemann N et al (2013) N2O and CH4 emissions, and NO3—leaching on a crop-yield basis from a subtropical rain-fed wheat–maize rotation in response to different types of nitrogen fertilizer. Ecosystems 1–16. doi:  10.1007/s10021-013-9723-7
  67. Zou JW, Huang Y, Jiang JY et al (2005) A 3-year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in China: effects of water regime, crop residue, and fertilizer application. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19:GB2021. doi: 10.1029/2004GB002401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zou JW, Huang Y, Zheng X, Wang Y (2007) Quantifying direct N2O emissions in paddy fields during rice growing season in mainland China: dependence on water regime. Atmos Environ 41:8030–8042. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Weller
    • 1
  • David Kraus
    • 1
  • Kevin Ray P. Ayag
    • 2
    • 3
  • Reiner Wassmann
    • 3
  • M. C. R. Alberto
    • 3
  • Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
    • 1
    • 4
  • Ralf Kiese
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-IFU)Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyGarmisch-PartenkirchenGermany
  2. 2.Kyung Hee UniversityYonginSouth Korea
  3. 3.International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)Los BanosPhilippines
  4. 4.International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)NairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations