Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 299–313

Management implications of conservation tillage and poultry litter use for Southern Piedmont USA cropping systems

  • Dinku M. Endale
  • Harry H. Schomberg
  • Michael B. Jenkins
  • Dory H. Franklin
  • Dwight S. Fisher
Research Article


Conservation tillage and judicious use of animal manures as fertilizers can make significant contributions for sustainable food production in the twenty-first century. Identifying and understanding the many interactions occurring within agricultural systems is fundamental for accomplishing this feat. This paper synthesizes 14 years of research results from a study that began in the early 1990s in which researchers from USDA-ARS and the University of Georgia investigated cropping system influences on nutrient management under natural rainfall. Increases in C and N with no-till resulted in improved soil structure that increased infiltration rate and soil water availability. Biological activity as indicated by earthworms was greater with no-till and poultry litter (PL). In all but the very driest year, yields of cotton and corn increased on average 10–27% with no-till and 32–42% with combination of no-till and PL. On the other hand soil nutrient accumulation, particularly P and Zn from long-term use of poultry litter in corn production, reached excessive levels and could present environmental risks. Drainage increased in no-till raising the risk of leaching of nutrients into the soil profile. However, runoff decreased in no-till and the presence of a rye cover crop during the winter reduced the leaching losses of N compared to no cover crop. During cotton production under relative drought, no-till and poultry litter led to somewhat elevated dissolved phosphorus concentration in runoff, and fluometuron was detected in runoff and drainage while pendimethalin was not. Fecal indicator bacteria (Escherichia coli and fecal enterococci), and the hormones estradiol and testosterone were observed in drainage and runoff but concentrations were similar across all treatments. By conducting the study for an extended period under natural environmental conditions, we were able to highlight real risks and potentials of the contrasting cropping systems. While 6 out of 14 years of relative drought might have limited the water quality response of treatments, such droughts are common features of the weather pattern in the region. Even then, use of no-till as the predominant tillage system was supported by improved yields. Fertilizer management, especially crop N need-based use of PL, requires closer monitoring to insure that production advantages of no-till and poultry litter are not offset by concerns with environmental risks. Long-term research requires sustained resource inputs to answer critical questions of environmental risk and emerging unknown issues.


Conventional tillage Corn Cotton No-till Organic matter Runoff Soil quality Water quality 


  1. Abrahamson DA, Radcliffe DE, Steiner JL, Cabrera ML, Endale DM, Hoogenboom G (2006) Evaluation of the RZWQM for simulating tile drainage and leached nitrate in the Georgia Piedmont. Agron J 98:644–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allmaras RR, Schomberg HH, Douglas CL Jr, Dao TH (2000) Soil organic carbon sequestration potential of adopting conservation tillage in U.S croplands. J Soil Water Conserv 55:365–373Google Scholar
  3. Brown GG, Benito NP, Pasini A, Sautter KD, Guimaraes MDF, Torres E (2003) No-tillage greatly increases earthworm populations in Parana state, Brazil. Pedobiologia 47(5–6):764–771Google Scholar
  4. Bruce RR, Langdale GW (1997) Soil carbon level dependence upon crop cultural variables in a Themic-Udic region. In: Paul EA, Paustian K, Elliot ET, Cole CV (eds) Soil organic matter in temperate agroecosystems. Long term experiments in North America. Lewis, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruce RR, Dane JH, Quisenberry VL, Powell NL, Thomas AW (1983) Physical characteristic of soils in the southern region: Cecil. Southern Coop Series Bull No 267. University of Georgia, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  6. CAES (College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences) (2007) Poultry litter application on pastures and hayfields. Bull 1330. University of Georgia, College of Agric and Environ Sci, Coop Ext Serv, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  7. CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center) (2001) Better soil better yields. A guide to improving soil organic matter and infiltration with continuous no-till. Conservation Technology Information Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, INGoogle Scholar
  8. CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center) (2009) 2008 National crop residue management survey. Conservation Technology Information Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. (validated 4 Sep 2009)
  9. Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Spec. Pub. No. 35. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 3–21Google Scholar
  10. Endale DM, Schomberg HH, Steiner JL (2000) Long term sediment yield and mitigation in a small Southern Piedmont watershed. Intern J Sediment Res 15(1):60–68Google Scholar
  11. Endale DM, Cabrera ML, Radcliffe DE, Steiner JL (2001) Nitrogen and phosphorus losses from no-till cotton fertilized with poultry litter in the Southern Piedmont. In: Hatcher KJ (ed) Proceedings of the 2001 Georgia Water Resources Conference, 26–27 March 2001, Athens, Georgia. Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, pp 408–411Google Scholar
  12. Endale DM, Radcliffe DE, Steiner JL, Cabrera ML (2002a) Drainage characteristics of a Southern Piedmont soil following six years of conventionally tilled or no-till cropping systems. Trans ASAE 45(5):1423–1432Google Scholar
  13. Endale DM, Cabrera ML, Steiner JL, Radcliffe DE, Vencill WK, Schomberg HH, Lohr L (2002b) Impact of conservation tillage and nutrient management on soil water and yield of cotton fertilized with poultry litter or ammonium nitrate in the Georgia Piedmont. Soil Tillage Res 66:55–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Endale DM, Schomberg HH, Cabrera ML, Steiner JL, Radcliffe DE, Vencill WK, Lohr L (2002c) Lint yield advantages of no-till and poultry litter-based cotton/rye cropping system in a Southern Piedmont soil: a five-year data set. In: van Santen E (ed) Making conservation tillage conventional: building a future on 25 years of research. Proceedings of 25th annual Southern conservation tillage conference for sustainable agriculture, Auburn, AL, 24–26 June 2002, pp 115–122Google Scholar
  15. Endale DM, Schomberg HH, Radcliffe DE, Jenkins M, Cabrera ML (2004) No-till on Cecil soil: Hydrologic and water quality impacts. Agronomy Abstracts 2004. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  16. Endale DM, Schomberg HH, Fisher DS, Jenkins MB, Cabrera ML (2008) Corn production in no-till amended with poultry litter in an Ultisol of southeastern USA. Agron J 100:1401–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EPA (2004) Managing manure nutrients at concentrated animal feeding operations. EPA 821-F-04–011. Office of Water (4503-T). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO (2008) Conservation agriculture. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United States. (validated 4 Sep 2009)
  19. Finlay-Moore O, Hartel PG, Cabrera ML (2000) 17β-estradiol and testosterone in soil and runoff from grasslands amended with broiler litter. J Environ Qual 29:1604–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franklin DH, West LT, Radcliffe DE, Hendrix PF (2007) Characteristics and genesis of preferential flow paths in a Piedmont Ultisol. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(3):752–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franzluebbers AJ, Wilkinson SR, Stuedemann JA (2004) Bermudagrass management in the Southern Piedmont, USA: IX. Trace elements in soil with broiler litter application. J Environ Qual 33:778–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Golabi MH, Radcliffe DE, Hargrove WL, Tollner EW (1995) Macropore effects in conventional tillage and no-tillage soils. J Soil Water Conserv 50(2):205–210Google Scholar
  23. Gupte SM, Radcliffe DE, Franklin DH, West LT, Tollner EW, Hendrix PE (1996) Anion transport in a Piedmont Ultisol: II. Local-scale parameters. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:755–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hargrove WL, Reid JT, Touchton JT, Gallaher RN (1982) Influences of tillage practices on the fertility status of an acid soil double-cropped to wheat and soybean. Agron J 74:684–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hendrix PF, Mueller BR, Bruce RR, Langdale GW, Parmelee RW (1992) Abundance and distribution of earthworms in relation to landscape factors on the Georgia Piedmont. U S A Soil Biol Biochem 24:1357–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson BP, Bertsch PM, Cabrera ML, Camberato JJ, Seaman JC, Wood CW (2003) Trace element speciation in poultry litter. J Environ Qual 32:535–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jangid K, Williams MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Sanderlin JS, Reeves JH, Jenkins MB, Endale DM, Coleman DC, Whitman WB (2008) Relative impacts of land-use, management intensity and fertilization upon soil microbial community structure in agricultural systems. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2843–2853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jeffrey JS, Kirk JH, Atwill ER, Cullor JS (1998) Prevalence of selected microbial pathogens in processed poultry waste used as dairy cattle feed. Poult Sci 77:808–811PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jenkins MB, Endale DM, Schomberg HH, Sharpe RR (2006) Fecal bacteria and sex hormones in soil and runoff from cropped watersheds amended with poultry litter. Sci Total Environ 358:164–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenkins MB, Truman CC, Siragusa G, Line E, Bailey JS, Frye J, Endale DM, Franklin DH, Schomberg HH, Fisher DS, Sharpe RR (2008) Rainfall and tillage effects on transport of fecal bacteria and sex hormones 17β-estradiol and testosterone from broiler litter applications to a Georgia Piedmont Ultisol. Sci Total Environ 403:154–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jenkins MB, Endale DM, Schomberg HH, Hartel PG, Cabrera ML (2009) 17β-estradiol and testosterone in drainage and runoff from poultry litter applications to tilled and no-till crop land under irrigation. J Environ Manage 90:2659–2664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson AD, Cabrera ML, McCracken DV, Radcliffe DE (1999) LEACHN simulations of nitrogen dynamics and water drainage in an Ultisol. Agron J 91:595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jordan D, Miles RJ, Hubbard VC, Lrenz T (2004) Effect of management practices and cropping systems on earthworm abundance and microbial activity in Sanborn Field: a 115-year-old agricultural field. Pedobiologia 48:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelley TR, Pancorbo OC, Merka WC, Thompson SA, Cabrera ML, Barnhart HM (1994) Fate of selected bacterial pathogens and indicators in fractionated poultry litter during storage. J Appl Poult Res 3:279–288Google Scholar
  35. Kingery WL, Wood CW, Delaney DP, Williams JC, Mullins GL (1994) Impact of long-term land application of broiler litter on environmentally related soil properties. J Environ Qual 23:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lachnicht WS, Schomberg HH, Hendrix PF, Spokas KA, Endale DM (2008) Construction of and electrical device for sampling earthworm populations in the field. Appl Eng Agric 24:391–397Google Scholar
  37. Lal R (2002) Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems of West Asia and North Africa. Land Degrad Dev 13:45–59. doi:10.1002/ldr.477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Langdale GW, West LT, Bruce RR, Miller WP, Thomas AW (1992) Restoration of eroded soil with conservation tillage. Soil Technol 5(1):81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCracken DV, Hargrove WL, Box Jr JE, Cabrera ML, Johnson JW, Reymer PL, Harbers GW, Johnson AD (1993) Influence of tillage and cover cropping on nitrate leaching. In: Bollich PK (ed) Proceedings of Southern conservation tillage conference for sustainable agriculture, Monroe Louisiana 15–17 June 1993. Louisiana Agric Exp Stn 93-86-7122, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, pp 11–15Google Scholar
  40. McCracken DV, Box JE Jr, Hargrove WL, Cabrera ML, Johnson JW, Reymer PL, Johnson AD, Harbers GW (1995) Nitrate leaching as affected by tillage and winter cover crop. In: Kingrey WL, Buehring N (eds) Proc Southern Conserv Tillage Conf for Sustainable Agric, Jackson Mississippi 26–28 June 1995. Mississippi Agric and Forest Exp Stn Spec Bull 88–7. Mississippi State University, MS, pp 26–31Google Scholar
  41. Moor PA Jr, Daniel TC, Sharpley AN, Wood CW (1995) Poultry manure management: environmentally sound options. J Soil Water Conserv 50:321–327Google Scholar
  42. NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service) (2009) Poultry. Production and value. 2008 summary. NASS, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Nichols DJ, Daniel TC, Moore PA, Edwards DR, Pote PH (1997) Runoff of estrogen hormone 17β-estradiol from poultry litter applied to pasture. J Environ Qual 26:1002–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. NRCS (National Resource Conservation Service) (1998) MLRA 136—Southern Piedmont. USDA-NRCS MO15, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  45. Pieri C, Evers G, Landers J, O’Connell P, Terry E (2002) No-till farming for sustainable rural farming. Agriculture and rural development working paper. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Radcliffe DE, West LT (2000) MLRA 136: Southern Piedmont, Southern Coop Series Bulletin #395. University of Georgia, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  47. Radcliffe DE, Tillotson PM, Hendrix PE, West LT, Box JE Jr, Tollner EW (1996) Anion transport in a Piedmont Ultisol: I. Field-scale parameters. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60(3):755–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reeleder RD, Miller JJ, Coelho BRB, Roy RC (2006) Impacts of tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen on populations of earthworms, microarthropods, and soil fungi in a cultivated fragile soil. Appl Soil Ecol 33(3):243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reeves DW (1997) The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping system. Soil Tillage Res 43:131–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ritz CW, Merka WC (2004) Maximizing poultry manure use through nutrient management planning. Bulletin 1245, Georgia Coop Ext Service, College of Agriculture and Environ Sci. University of Georgia, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  51. Schomberg HH, Lewis L, Tillman G, Olson D, Timper P, Wauchope D, Phatak S, Jay M (2003) Conceptual model for sustainable cropping systems in the Southeast: cotton systems. J Crop Prod 8:307–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schomberg HH, Endale DM, Jenkins MB, Sharpe RR, Fisher DS, Cabrera ML, McCracken DV (2009a) Soil test nutrient changes induced by poultry litter under conventional tillage and no-tillage. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schomberg HH, Wietholter S, Griffin TS, Reeves DW, Cabrera ML, Fisher DS, Endale DM, Novak JM, Balkcom KS, Raper RL, Kitchen NR, Locke MA, Potter KN, Schwartz RC, Truman CC, Tyler DD (2009b) Assessing indices for predicting potential nitrogen mineralization in soils under different management systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1575–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schnepf M, Cox C (eds) (2006) Environmental benefits of conservation on cropland. The status of our knowledge. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IAGoogle Scholar
  55. Sharpley AN, Smith SJ, Bain WR (1993) Nitrogen and phosphorus fate from long-term poultry litter application to Oklahoma soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1131–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharpley AN, Chupru SC, Wedenphol R, Sims JT, Daniel TC, Reddy KR (1994) Managing agricultural phosphorus for protection of surface water issues and options. J Environ Qual 23:437–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stephenson AH, McCaskey TA, Ruffin BG (1990) A survey of broiler litter composition and value as a potential nutrient resource. Biol Waste 34:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trimble SW (1974) Man induced soil erosion on the Southern Piedmont, 1770–1970. Soil and Water Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, IAGoogle Scholar
  59. Vencill WK, Radcliffe DE, Cabrera ML, Endale DM, Steiner JL, Schomberg HH, Lohr L (1999) Herbicide surface runoff and leaching from a cotton-rye cropping system under contrasting tillage and nutrient management levels. In: The 1999 Brighton conference—weeds. Proceedings of international conference held at the Brighton, Metropole Hotel, Brighton, UK, 15–18 Nov 1999. British Crop Protection Council, pp 663–668Google Scholar
  60. Young EG (1985) Characterization of hydrograph recession of land drains. J Hydrol 82(1–2):17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dinku M. Endale
    • 1
  • Harry H. Schomberg
    • 1
  • Michael B. Jenkins
    • 1
  • Dory H. Franklin
    • 1
  • Dwight S. Fisher
    • 1
  1. 1.USDA-ARS, J. Phil Campbell Sr. Natural Resource Conservation CenterWatkinsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations