Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 215–223 | Cite as

Quantifying soil organic carbon in forage-based cow–calf congregation-grazing zone interface

  • Gilbert C. Sigua
  • Samuel W. Coleman
  • Joseph P. Albano
Research article

Abstract

Recent concerns about global warming due to accumulations of atmospheric CO2 have encouraged the achievement of better understanding of the roles of animal agriculture in mitigating CO2 emissions. Grazing can accelerate and alter the timing of nutrient transfers, and increase the amount of nutrients cycled from plant to soil. Our reason for conducting this study is to test whether cattle congregation sites (CCS) typical on most Florida ranches, such as mineral feeders (MF), water troughs (WT), and shaded areas (SA) have higher soil organic carbon (SOC) than in other locations of pasture under foraged-based system. Baseline soil samples around the congregations zones (MF, WT, and SA) and grazing zones in established (>10 year), grazed cow–calf pastures were collected in the spring and fall of 2003, 2004, and 2005, respectively. Soil samples were collected from two soil depths (0–20 and 20–40 cm) at different locations around the CCS following a radial (every 90 degrees: N, S, E, and W) sampling pattern at 0.9, 1.7, 3.3, 6.7, 13.3, 26.7, and 53.3 m away from the approximate center of MF, WT, and SA. The levels of SOC varied significantly with CCS (P ≤ 0.001), distance away from the center of the CCS (P ≤ 0.05), sampling depth (P ≤ 0.001), sampling year (P ≤ 0.001) and the interaction of CCS and soil depth (P ≤ 0.001). Sampling orientations did not significantly affect the levels of SOC. The SA sites had the highest level of SOC of 3.58 g kg−1, followed by WT sites (3.47 g kg−1) and MF sites (2.98 g kg−1). Results of our study did not support our hypothesis that cattle congregation sites typical on most ranches, such as MF, WT and SA, may have higher concentrations of SOC. The levels of SOC (averaged across CCS) within the congregation zone (3.42 g kg−1) were not significantly (P ≤ 0.05) different from the concentrations of SOC at the grazing zone (3.16 g kg−1).

Keywords

Soil carbon Cow–calf Congregation zones Bahiagrass Nutrient cycling Pastures Carbon sequestration Grazing 

References

  1. Birch HF (1958) The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant Soil 10:9–31. doi:10.1007/BF01343734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density-core method. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, 2nd edn. Agronomy Monograph 9. American society of agronomy, Madison, pp 363–375Google Scholar
  3. Bowers EJ, Hammond AC, Chase CC Jr, Olson TA (1995) Effect of breed on indicators of heat tolerance and grazing activity in lactating Angus and Brahman cows in Florida. J Anim Sci 73(Suppl 1):131Google Scholar
  4. Bruce JP, Frome M, Haites E, Janzen J, Lal R, Paustian K (1999) Carbon sequestration in soils. J Soil Water Conserv 54:382–389Google Scholar
  5. Chambliss CG (1999) Florida forage handbook. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service SP253Google Scholar
  6. Cluzeau D, Binet F, Vertes F, Simon JC, Riviere JM, Trehen P (1992) Effects of intensive cattle trampling on soil-plant-earthworms system in two grassland types. Soil Biol Biochem 24(12):1661–1992. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(92)90166-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conant RT, Paustian K, Elliot ET (2001) Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecol Appl 11:343–355. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0343:GMACIG]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Derner JD, Beriske DD, Boutton TW (1997) Does grazing mediate soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation beneath C4, perennial grasses along an environmental gradient? Plant Soil 191:147–156. doi:10.1023/A:1004298907778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dormaar JF, Johnston A, Smoliak S (1977) Seasonal variations in chemical characteristics of soil organic matter of grazed and ungrazed mixed prairie and fescue grassland. J Range Manage 30:195–198. doi:10.2307/3897467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott ET (1986) Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:627–633Google Scholar
  11. Follett RF, Kimble JM, Lal R (2000) The potential of US grazing lands to sequester soil carbon. In: Follett RF, Kimble JM, Lal R (eds) The potential of US grazing lands to sequester soil carbon. CRC Press, Chelsea, pp 401–430Google Scholar
  12. Franzluebbers AJ, Stuedemann JA, Schomberg HH (2000) Spatial distribution of soil carbon and nitrogen pools under grazed tall fescue. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:635–639Google Scholar
  13. Gallardo JF, Saavedra J (1987) Soil organic matter determination. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 18:699–707. doi:10.1080/00103628709367852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ganskopp D (2001) Manipulating cattle distribution with salt and water in large arid-land pastures: a GPS/GIS assessment. Appl Anim Behav Sci 73:251–262. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00148-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gebhart DL, Johnson HB, Mayeux HS, Polley HW (1994) The CRP increases soil organic carbon. J Soil Water Conserv 49:488–492Google Scholar
  16. Hammond AC, Olson TA (1994) Rectal temperature and grazing time in selected beef cattle breeds under tropical summer conditions in subtropical Florida. Trop Agric Trinidad 71:128–134Google Scholar
  17. Haynes RJ (1981) Competitive aspects of the grass-legume association. Adv Agron 33:227–261. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60168-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haynes RJ, Williams PH (1993) Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in grazed pasture ecosystem. Adv Agron 49:119–199. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60794-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holechek JL (1988) An approach for setting stocking rate. Rangeland 10:10–14Google Scholar
  20. Houghton RA, Hackler JL, Lawrence KT (1999) The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science 285:574–578. doi:10.1126/science.285.5427.574 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klemmedson JO (1964) Topofunction of soils and vegetation in a range landscape. American Society of Agronomy Spec. Publ., vol 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  22. Klemmedson JO, Tiedemann AR (1995) Effects of nutrient stress. In: Bedunah DJ, Sosebee R (eds) Wildland plants: physiological ecology and developmental morphology. Society of Range Management, Denver, pp 414–439Google Scholar
  23. Lal R, Kimble JM, Cole CV (1998) The potential of US cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, p 128Google Scholar
  24. Lal R, Follet RF, Kimble JM, Cole CV (1999) Management of US cropland to sequester carbon in soil. J Soil Water Conserv 54:374–381Google Scholar
  25. LeCain DR, Morgan JA, Schuman GE, Reeder JD, Hart RH (2002) Carbon exchange and species composition of grazed pastures and exclosures in the shortgrass steppe of Colorado. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93:421–435. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00290-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lowther JR, Smethurst PJ, Carlye JC, Mabiar EK (1990) Methods for determining organic carbon in Podzolic sands. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 21:457–470. doi:10.1080/00103629009368245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma Z, Wood CA, Bransby DJ (2000) Soil management impacts on soil carbon sequestration by switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 18:469–477. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00013-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manley JT, Schuman GE, Reeder JD, Hart RH (1995) Rangeland soil carbon and nitrogen responses to grazing. J Soil Water Conserv 50:294–298Google Scholar
  29. Martin SC, Ward DE (1973) Salt and meal-salt help distribute cattle use on semi-desert range. J Range Manage 26:94–97. doi:10.2307/3896459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathews BW, Sollenberger LE, Nair VD, Staples CR (1994) Impact of grazing management on soil nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur distribution. J Environ Qual 23:1006–1013Google Scholar
  31. Mathews BW, Tritschler JP, Carpenter JR, Sollenberger LE (1999) Soil macronutrients distribution in rotationally stocked kikuyugrass paddocks with short and long grazing periods. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30:557–571. doi:10.1080/00103629909370226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McIntosh PD, Lynn IH, Johnstone PD (2000) Creating and testing a geometric soil-landscape model in dry steeplands using a very low sampling density. Aust J Soil Res 38:101–112. doi:10.1071/SR99029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK (1993) Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecol Monogr 63:327–366. doi:10.2307/2937150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paustian K, Levine E, Post WM, Ryzhova IM (1997) The use of models to integrate information and understanding of soil C at the regional scale. Geoderma 79:227–260. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00043-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Powlson DS (1980) The effects of grinding on microbial and non-microbial organic matter in soil. J Soil Sci 31:77–85. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1980.tb02066.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schimel DS (1995) Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Glob Change Biol 1:77–91. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00008.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schulte EE, Kaufman C, Peter JB (1991) The influence of sample size and heating time on soil weight loss-on-ignition. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 22:159–168. doi:10.1080/00103629109368402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schuman GE, Reeder JD, Manley TJ, Hart RH, Manley WH (1999) Impact of grazing management on the carbon and nitrogen balance of mixed grass rangeland. Ecol Appl 9:65–71. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0065:IOGMOT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Senft RL, Rittenhouse LR, Woodmanse RG (1985) Factors influencing patterns of cattle grazing behavior on shortgrass steppe. J Range Manage 38:82–87. doi:10.2307/3899341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sigua GC, Coleman SW (2007) Sustainable management of nutrients in forage-based pasture soils: effect of animal congregation sites. J Soils Sediments 6(4):249–253. doi:10.1065/jss2006.09.182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sigua GC, Tweedale WA (2003) Watershed scale assessment of nitrogen and phosphorus loadings in the Indian River Lagoon Basin, FL. J Environ Manage 67(4):361–370. doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00220-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sims PL, Singh JS (1978) The structure and function of ten western North American grasslands III. Net primary production, turnover, and efficiencies of energy capture and water use. J Ecol 66:573–597. doi:10.2307/2259152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Statistical Analysis System (2000) SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Release 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 494 ppGoogle Scholar
  44. Trimble SW, Mendel AC (1995) The cow as a geomorphic agent–a critical review. Geomorphology 13:233–253. doi:10.1016/0169-555X(95)00028-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weinhold BJ, Hendrickson JR, Karn JF (2001) Pasture management influences on soil properties in the Northern Great Plains. J Soil Water Conserv 56:27–31Google Scholar
  46. White SL, Sheffield RE, Washburn SP, King LD, Green TJ Jr (2001) Spatial and time distribution of dairy cattle excreta in an intensive pasture system. J Environ Qual 30:2180–2187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert C. Sigua
    • 1
  • Samuel W. Coleman
    • 1
  • Joseph P. Albano
    • 2
  1. 1.USDA, ARS, Subtropical Agricultural Research StationBrooksvilleUSA
  2. 2.USDA-ARS Horticultural Research LaboratoryFt. PierceUSA

Personalised recommendations