Nitrogen dynamics following grain legumes and subsequent catch crops and the effects on succeeding cereal crops
- 600 Downloads
The effects of faba bean, lupin, pea and oat crops, with and without an undersown grass-clover mixture as a nitrogen (N) catch crop, on subsequent spring wheat followed by winter triticale crops were determined by aboveground dry matter (DM) harvests, nitrate (NO3) leaching measurements and soil N balances. A 2½-year lysimeter experiment was carried out on a temperate sandy loam soil. Crops were not fertilized in the experimental period and the natural 15N abundance technique was used to determine grain legume N2 fixation. Faba bean total aboveground DM production was significantly higher (1,300 g m−2) compared to lupin (950 g m−2), pea (850 g m−2) and oat (1,100 g m−2) independent of the catch crop strategy. Faba bean derived more than 90% of its N from N2 fixation, which was unusually high as compared to lupin (70–75%) and pea (50–60%). No effect of preceding crop was observed on the subsequent spring wheat or winter triticale DM production. Nitrate leaching following grain legumes was significantly reduced with catch crops compared to without catch crops during autumn and winter before sowing subsequent spring wheat. Soil N balances were calculated from monitored N leaching from the lysimeters, and measured N-accumulation from the leguminous species, as N-fixation minus N removed in grains including total N accumulation belowground according to Mayer et al. (2003a). Negative soil N balances for pea, lupin and oat indicated soil N depletion, but a positive faba bean soil N balance (11 g N m−2) after harvest indicated that more soil mineral N may have been available for subsequent cereals. However, the plant available N may have been taken up by the grass dominated grass-clover catch crop which together with microbial N immobilization and N losses could leave limited amounts of available N for uptake by the subsequent two cereal crops.
KeywordsCatch cropping Pea Faba bean Lupin Nitrate leaching Nitrogen fixation Subsequent cereals
The European Commission Contract No. FOOD-CT-2004-506223 New Strategies to Improve Grain Legumes for Food and Feed (GLIP) funded this study.
- Andersen A, Olsen CC (1993) Rye grass as a catch crop in spring barley. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 43:218–230Google Scholar
- Breland TA (1996) Green manuring with clover and ryegrass catch crops undersown in small grains: effects on soil mineral nitrogen in field and laboratory experiments. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 46:178–185Google Scholar
- De Neergaard A, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen LS, Magid J (2002) Decomposition of white clover (Trifolium repens) and ryegrass (Lolium perenne) components: C and N dynamics simulated with the DAISY soil organic matter submodel. Eur J Agron 16:43–55. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00118-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Helander CA (2004) Residual nitrogen effects on a succeeding oat (Avena sativa L.) crop of clover species and ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) undersown in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 54:67–75Google Scholar
- Karlsson-Strese EM, Rydberg I, Becker HC, Umaerus M (1998) Strategy for catch crop development II. Screening of species undersown in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with respect to catch crop growth and grain yield. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 48:26–33Google Scholar
- SAS (1990) SAS procedure guide, Version 6, 3rd edn. SAS Institute, Cary, p 705Google Scholar
- Shearer G, Kohl DH (1986) N-2-fixation in field settings—estimations based on natural N-15 abundance. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:699–756Google Scholar
- Stevenson FC, Van Kessel C (1996) A landscape-scale assessment of the nitrogen and non-nitrogen rotation benefits of pea. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1797–1805Google Scholar
- Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750Google Scholar