Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 267–279 | Cite as

Nutrient evolution in soil and cereal yield under different fertilization type in dryland

Research Article

Abstract

Under semiarid conditions the response of crops to synthetic fertilizers is often reduced. Organic fertilizers can be used to provide a continuous source of nutrients for the crops. The soil nitrogen and crop yield in a rotation of durum wheat (Triticum durum)–fallow-barley (Hordeum vulgare)–vetch (Vicia sativa) were studied during 4 years when synthetic fertilizer (chemical), compost (organic) or no fertilizer (control) were applied in a field with high initial contents of soil NO3–N (> 400 kg N ha−1), phosphorus (22 mg kg−1) and potassium (> 300 mg kg−1). Changes in soil organic matter, phosphorus and potassium were also measured. During the crop period, chemical fertilization significantly increased the content of soil NO3–N in the first 0.30 m of soil with respect to organic fertilization and the control. The yield of wheat and barley was not increased after applying chemical or organic fertilizer with respect to the unfertilized plots. The estimated losses of nitrogen were similar for the three types of fertilization, as well as the uptake of nitrogen for the total biomass produced. The initial levels of organic matter and phosphorus were maintained, even in the plots that were not fertilized, while the potassium decreased slightly. Thus, the rotation and burying of crop residues were enough to maintain the crop yield and the initial content of nutrients.

Keywords

Compost Nitrogen balance Semiarid climate Rotation Organic matter 

References

  1. Angás P, Lampurlanés J, Cantero-Martínez C (2006) Tillage and N fertilization effects on N dynamics and barley yield under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Soil Tillage Res 87:59–71. doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.02.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biederbeck VO, Bouman OT, Campbell CA, Bailey LD, Winkleman GE (1996) Nitrogen benefits from four green-manure legumes in dryland cropping systems. Can J Plant Sci 76:307–315Google Scholar
  3. Campbell CA, Selles F, Zetner RP, Mcconkey BG (1993) Available water and nitrogen effects on yields components and grain nitrogen of zero-till spring wheat. Agron J 85:114–120Google Scholar
  4. Campbell CA, Schnitzer M, Lafond GP, Zetner RP, Knipfel JE (1991) Thirty year crop rotation and management practices effects on soil amino nitrogen. Soil Sci Am J 55:739–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantero-Martínez C, O’Leary GJ, Connor DJ (1995) Stubble retention and nitrogen fertilization in a fallow-wheat rainfed cropping systems, soil water and nitrogen conservation, crop growth and yield. Soil Tillage Res 34:79–94. doi:10.1016/0167-1987(95)00459-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantero-Martínez C, Angás P, Lampurlanés J (2003) Growth, yield and water productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) affected by tillage and N fertilization in Mediterranean semiarid, rainfed conditions of Spain. Field Crops Res 84:341–357. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00101-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavero J, Plant RE, Shennan C, Friedman DB (1997) The effect of nitrogen source and crop rotation on the growth and yield processing tomatoes. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 47:271–282. doi:10.1007/BF01986282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chae YM, Tabatabai MA (1986) Mineralization of nitrogen in soils amended with organic wastes. J Environ Qual 15:193–198Google Scholar
  9. Chescheir GM, Westerman PW, Safley LM (1986) Laboratory methods for estimating available nitrogen in manures and sludges. Agric Wastes 18:173–195. doi:10.1016/0141-4607(86)90112-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christian DG, Goodlas G, Powlson DS (1992) Nitrogen uptake by cover crops. Asp Appl Biol 30:291–300Google Scholar
  11. Drinkwater LE, Wagoner P, Sarrantonio M (1998) Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396:262–265. doi:10.1038/24376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowler DB, Brydon J, Baker RJ (1989) Nitrogen fertilization of no-till and winter wheat and rye I yield and agronomic responses. Agron J 81:66–72Google Scholar
  13. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis-part 1, physical and mineralogical methods, agronomy nº 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 377–411Google Scholar
  14. Granstedt A (1990) The supply and conservation of nitrogen in alternative farming–ecological agriculture-Proceedings of the ecological agriculture, Uppsala (Sweden), 163–177Google Scholar
  15. Hanks RJ (1992) Applied soil physics, soil water and temperature applications. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Helrich K (1990) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC).Edit., vol 1. AOAC, Virginia, 297 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenkinson DS (1982) The nitrogen cycle in long term field experiments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 296:563–571. doi:10.1098/rstb.1982.0028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jenkinson DS (1991) The Rothamsted long-term experiments: are they still of use? Agron J 83:2–10Google Scholar
  19. Karlen DL, Vervel GE, Bullock DG, Cruse RM (1994) Crop rotations for 21st century. Adv Agron 45:1–45. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60611-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knudsen D, Petersen GA, Pratt PF (1982) Lithium, sodium, potassium. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis-part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, agronomy nº 9. American Society of Agronomy, USA, pp 225–246Google Scholar
  21. Le Gouis J, Delebarre O, Beghin D, Heumez E, Pluchard P (1999) Nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency of two-row and six-row winter barley cultivars grown at two N levels. Eur J Agron 10:73–79. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(98)00055-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. López-Bellido L, Lopez-Garrido FJ, Fuentes M, Castillo JE, Fernández EJ (1997) Influence of tillage, crop rotation and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic matter and nitrogen under rain-fed Mediterranean conditions. Soil Tillage Res 43:277–293. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00018-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mathenson N, Kirschenmann F (1991) Cereal legume cropping systems: nine farm case studies in the dryland Northern Plains. Canadian Prairies and Intermountain Northwest. Alternative Energy Resources Organization, USA, 75 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Moret D, Arrúe JL, López MV, Gracia R (2007) Winter barley performance under different cropping and tillage systems in semiarid Aragón (NE Spain). Eur J Agron 26:54–63. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2006.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neely CL, Mcvay KA, Hargrove WL (1987) Nitrogen contribution of winter legumes to no-till corn grain sorghum. In: Power JF (ed) The role of legumes in conservation tillage systems. SCSA, Ankeny Iowa, pp 48–49Google Scholar
  26. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis-part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, agronomy nº 9. ASA and SSSA, USA, pp 539–579Google Scholar
  27. Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis-part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, agronomy nº 9. American Society of Agronomy, USA, pp 403–430Google Scholar
  28. Pang XP, Letey J (2000) Organic farming: challenge of timing nitrogen availability to crop nitrogen requirements. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:247–253Google Scholar
  29. Pardo G, Aibar J, Ciria P, Cristóbal MV, De Benito A, García Martín A, García Muriedas G, Labrador C, Lacasta C, Lafarga A, Lezaún JA, Meco R, Villa F, Zaragoza C (2004) Influencia del tipo de fertilización y desherbado en una rotación de cereales en secano. ITEA 100:34–50Google Scholar
  30. Ranells NN, Wagger MG (1996) Nitrogen release from grass and legume cover crop monocultures and bicultures. Agron J 88:777–782Google Scholar
  31. Ryser J, Pittet P (2000) Influence du sol et de la fumure sur les cultures et le drainage des éléments fertilisants. Rev Suisse Agric 32(4):159–164Google Scholar
  32. Shennan C (1992) Cover crops, nitrogen cycling, and soil properties en semi-irrigated vegetable production systems. Hortic Sci 27:749–754Google Scholar
  33. Smith MS, Frye WW, Varco JJ (1987) Legume winter cover crops. Adv Soil Sci 7:95–139Google Scholar
  34. Smith KA, Chambers BJ (1993) Utilizing the nitrogen content of organic manures: on farms—problems and practical solutions. Soil Use Manag 9:105–112. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1993.tb00938.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Snapp SS, Swinton SM, Labarta R, Mutch D, Black JR, Leep R, Nyiraneza J, O’Neil K (2005) Evaluating cover crops for benefits, cost and performance within cropping systems niches. Agron J 97:322–332Google Scholar
  36. Stockdale EA, Lampkin NH, Hovi M, Keatinge R, Lennartsson EKM, Macdonald DW, Padel S, Tattersall FH, Wolfe MS, Watson CA (2000) Agronomic and environmental implications of organic farming systems. Adv Agron 70:261–327. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(01)70007-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Unger PW (1968) Soil organic matter and nitrogen change during 24 years of dryland wheat tillage and cropping practices. Proc-Soil Sci Soc Am 32:426–429Google Scholar
  38. Urbano P (1995) Tratado de Fitotecnia General. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, MadridGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Faassen HG, Van Dijk H (1987) Manure as a source of nitrogen and phosphorus in soils. In: Van de Meer et al (eds) Animal manure on grassland and fodder crops, fertilizer or waste-Development in Plant and soil sciences. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 27–45Google Scholar
  40. Van Herwaarden AF, Farguhar GD, Angus JF, Richards RA, Howe GN (1998) “Haying-off” the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertiliser. I, biomass, grain yield, and water use. Aust J Agric Res 49(7):1067–1081. doi:10.1071/A97039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wadman P, Neeteson JJ (1992) Leaching losses from organic manures- the Dutch experience. In: Archer et al. (eds) Aspects of Applied Biology Nº 30, nitrate and farming systems, 117–126Google Scholar
  42. Wetters JH, Uglum KL (1970) Direct spectro-photometric simultaneous determination of nitrite and nitrate in the ultraviolet. Anal Chem 42:335–340. doi:10.1021/ac60285a016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EUITA Universidad de SevillaSevillaSpain
  2. 2.EE. Aula Dei. CSICZaragozaSpain
  3. 3.Escuela Politécnica Superior de HuescaHuescaSpain
  4. 4.CITA-DGAZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations