Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 111–123 | Cite as

Effect of organic and inorganic phosphate fertilizers and their combination on maize yield and phosphorus availability in a Yellow Earth in Myanmar

  • T. M. Aye
  • M. J. Hedley
  • P. Loganathan
  • R. D. B. Lefroy
  • N. S. Bolan
Research Article


Phosphorus (P) deficiency is a major constraint for crop production in many parts of the world including Myanmar and field research into management of P fertilizers and P responsiveness of crops on infertile soils has been limited. The purpose of this study is to determine maize yield response to different forms of P fertilizers on an acidic (pH 4.9) P deficient (Olsen-P 8 mg kg−1) Yellow Earth (Acrisol) in Southern Shan State, Myanmar and to establish relationships between soil Olsen-P test values (0.5 M sodium bicarbonate extracted P) and maize yield. Field experiments were conducted during two cropping seasons. There were 15 treatments in total: P was applied at seven rates of a soluble P fertilizer as Triple superphosphate (TSP) (0–120 kg P ha−1) to establish a P response curve; one rate of a partially soluble P fertilizer (Chinese partially acidulated phosphate rock, CPAPR) and two organic P fertilizers (farmyard manure (FYM) and Tithonia diversifolia) at 20 kg P ha−1; combination of TSP and CPAPR at 20 kg P ha−1 with FYM and Tithonia at 20 kg P ha−1; an additional treatment (TSP 20 kg P ha−1 plus 2.5 t ha−1 dolomite) for assessing the liming effect of a local dolomite. In Year 1, applications of TSP at 40–60 kg P ha−1 produced near maximum grain yields, whereas in Year 2 this could be achieved with a reapplication of 20–30 kg P ha−1 on top of the residual value of the Year 1 application. In both years, CPAPR, TSP and Tithonia at 20 kg P ha−1 significantly increased maize grain yield, but FYM failed to increase grain yield. In Year 1, CPAPR and TSP effects on grain yield were higher than that of Tithonia but in Year 2 the effects were same for all these three treatments. In both years the combination of FYM (20 kg P ha−1) with TSP (20 kg P ha−1) produced significantly higher grain yield than TSP at 20 kg P ha−1 whereas 40 kg P ha−1 of TSP application did not significantly increase grain yield over the TSP application at 20 kg P ha−1. Similar results were obtained when half the P applied as CPAPR was substituted with P from Tithonia and FMP during the first year. The combined data from the two years experiment suggests that 90% of maximum maize grain yields can be obtained by raising the Olsen-P to 30–35 mg P ha−1 soil at the silking stage of growth. Olsen-P for the treatments at silking in Year 1 was: Control < FYM, Tithonia < TSP, CPAPR and in Year 2 was: Control < FYM < Tithonia < TSP, CPAPR. The results showed that for a long-term approach, repeated annual applications of Tithonia can be considered as a potential P source for improving soil P status in P deficient Yellow Earths.


Phosphate fertilizer Partially acidulated phosphate rock Tithonia diversifolia Olsen-P, Yellow Earth Acrisol Maize 


  1. Aye TM (2001) Developing sustainable soil fertility in Southern Shan State of Myanmar. PhD thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolan NS, Hedley MJ, Harrison R, Braithwaite AC (1990) Influence of manufacturing variables on characteristics and the agronomic value of partially acidulated phosphate fertilizers. Fert Res 26:119–138. doi:10.1007/BF01048750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Budianta D (1999) Reclamation of an Utisol from South Sumatra using Mucuna L. and Lime. PhD Thesis, University of Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  4. Chien SH, Sale PWG, Friesen DK (1990) A discussion of the methods for comparing the relative effectiveness of phosphate fertilisers varying in solubility. Fert Res 24:149–157. doi:10.1007/BF01073583 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cong PT (2000) Improving phosphorus availability in selected soils from the uplands of Southvietnam by residue management. PhD thesis, K U Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  6. Cong PT, Merckx R (2005) Improving phosphorus availability in two upland soils of Vietnam using Thithonia diversifolia H. Plant Soil 269:11–23. doi:10.1007/s11104-004-1791-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darmody RG, Foss JE, McIntosh M, Wolf DC (1983) Municipal sewage sludge compost-amended soils: some spatiotemporal treatment effects. J Environ Qual 12:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falih AMK, Wainwright M (1996) Microbial and enzyme activity in soils amended with a natural source of easily available carbon. Biol Fertil Soils 21:177–183. doi:10.1007/BF00335931 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregg PEH, Mackay AD, Currie LD, Syers JK (1988) Application strategies for Sechura phosphate rock use on permanent pasture. Fert Res 17:219–243. doi:10.1007/BF01049579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammond L, Chien SH, Mokwunye AU (1986) Agronomic value of unacidulated and partially acidulated phosphate rocks indigenous to the tropics. Adv Agron 40:89–140. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60281-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haynes RJ, Mokolobate MS (2001) Ameliaration of Al toxicity and P deficiency in acid soils by addition of organic residues: a critical review of the phenomenon and the mechanisms involved. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 59:47–63. doi:10.1023/A:1009823600950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedley MJ, Bolan NS, Braithwaite AC (1988) Single superphosphate-reactive phosphate rock mixtures. 2. The effect of phosphate rock type and denning time on the amounts of acidulated and extractable phosphate. Fert Res 16:179–194. doi:10.1007/BF01049773 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hue NV (1992) Correcting soil acidity of a highly weathered Ultisol with chicken manure and sewage sludge. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 23:241–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IBSRAM (International Board for Soil Research, Management) (1994) Methodological guidelines for IBSRAM’S soil management networks, 2nd edn. IBRAM, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  15. Ikerra ST, Semu E, Mrema JP (2006) Combining Tithonia diversifolia and minjingu phosphate rock for improvement of P availability and maize grain yields on a chronic acrisol in Morogoro, Tanzannia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 76:249–260. doi:10.1007/s10705-006-9007-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jama B, Palm CA, Buresh RJ, Niang A, Gachengo C, Nziguheba G et al (2000) Tithonia diversifolia as a green manure for soil fertility improvement in western Kenya: A review. Agrofor Syst 49:201–221. doi:10.1023/A:1006339025728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khaleel R, Reddy KR, Overcash MR (1981) Changes in soil physical properties due to organic waste application: a review. J Environ Qual 10:133–141Google Scholar
  18. Mnkeni PNS, Chien SH, Carmona G (2000) Effectiveness of Panda Hills phosphate rock compacted with triple superphosphate as source of phosphorus for rape, wheat, maize, and soybean. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:3163–3175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naidu R (1985) Lime–aluminium-phosphate interactions in selected acid soils from Fiji. PhD Thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  20. Nziguheba G, Merckx R, Palm CA, Mutuo P (2002) Combining Tithonia diversifolia and fertilizers for maize production in phosphorus deficient soil in Kenya. Agrofor Syst 55:165–174. doi:10.1023/A:1020540411245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  22. Parkinson JA, Allen SE (1975) A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 6:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanchez PA, Uehara G (1980) Management considerations for acid soils with high phosphorus fixation capacity. In: Khasawneh FE (ed) The role of phosphorus in agriculture. ASA, Madison, pp 471–514Google Scholar
  24. SAS institute Inc (1989) The system for windows v6.12, 1989–1996 by SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Saunders WMH (1965) Phosphate retention by New Zealand soils and its relationship to free sesquioxides, organic matter and other soil properties. NZ J Agric Res 8:30–57Google Scholar
  26. Von Uexküll HR, Bosshart RP (1989) Management of acid upland soils in Asia. In: Craswell ET, Pushparajah E (eds) Management of acid soils in the humic tropic of Asia. Co-published by Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research and IBSRAM, ACIAR Monograph No.13Google Scholar
  27. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. M. Aye
    • 1
  • M. J. Hedley
    • 2
  • P. Loganathan
    • 2
  • R. D. B. Lefroy
    • 1
  • N. S. Bolan
    • 3
  1. 1.International Center for Tropical Agriculture-AsiaVientianeLao PDR
  2. 2.Soil and Earth Sciences, Institute of Natural ResourcesMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  3. 3.School of Natural and Built Environment, University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations