Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 169–178 | Cite as

Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics

  • Pete SmithEmail author
Research Article


Historically, soils have lost 40–90 Pg carbon (C) globally through cultivation and disturbance with current rates of C loss due to land use change of about 1.6 ± 0.8 Pg C y−1, mainly in the tropics. Since soils contain more than twice the C found in the atmosphere, loss of C from soils can have a significant effect of atmospheric CO2 concentration, and thereby on climate. Halting land-use conversion would be an effective mechanism to reduce soil C losses, but with a growing population and changing dietary preferences in the developing world, more land is likely to be required for agriculture. Maximizing the productivity of existing agricultural land and applying best management practices to that land would slow the loss of, or is some cases restore, soil C. There are, however, many barriers to implementing best management practices, the most significant of which in developing countries are driven by poverty. Management practices that also improve food security and profitability are most likely to be adopted. Soil C management needs to considered within a broader framework of sustainable development. Policies to encourage fair trade, reduced subsidies for agriculture in developed countries and less onerous interest on loans and foreign debt would encourage sustainable development, which in turn would encourage the adoption of successful soil C management in developing countries. If soil management is to be used to help address the problem of global warming, priority needs to be given to implementing such policies.


Soil organic carbon SOC Land use change Sequestration Barriers Sustainable development Climate mitigation 



The structure of this paper is based on a chapter prepared of a UN book “Impact of land use change on Soil Resources” (eds: AK Braimoh and PLG Vlek) but includes updated material arising from the IPCC WGIII (2007) report and other papers and reports published during 2006 and 2007. Gert-Jan Narbuurs and Eveline Trines provided interesting discussions regarding barriers to implementations of C sequestration and other land-based mitigation measures, which helped greatly in writing the section on overcoming barriers.


  1. Allen JC (1985) Soil response to forest clearing in the United States and tropics: geological and biological factors. Biotropica 17:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batjes NH (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151-163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannell MGR (2003) Carbon sequestration and biomass energy offset: theoretical, potential and achievable capacities globally, in Europe and the UK. Biomass Bioenergy 24:97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao M, Woodward FI (1998) Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nature 393:249–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole V, Cerri C, Minami KA et al (1996) Agricultural options for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. In: Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH, Dokken DJ (eds) Climate change 1995. impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 745–771Google Scholar
  6. Conway G, Toenniessen G (1999) Feeding the world in the twenty-first century. Nature 402:C55–C58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408:184–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson JJC, Smith P (2007) Carbon losses from soil and its consequences for land management. Science of the Total Environment.  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.03.023
  9. Detwiller RP, Hall AS (1988) Tropical forests and the global carbon cycle. Science 239:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fearnside PM (1997) Greenhouse gases from deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: net committed emissions. Clim Change 35:321–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freibauer A, Rounsevell M, Smith P, Verhagen A (2004) Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma 122:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedlingstein P, Cox P, Betts R, Bopp L, Von Bloh W, Brovkin V, Cadule P, Doney S, Eby M, Fung I, Bala G, John J, Jones C, Joos F, Kato T, Kawamiya M, Knorr W, Lindsay K, Matthews HD, Raddatz T, Rayner P, Reick C, Roeckner E, Schnitzler KG, Schnur R, Strassmann K, Weaver AJ, Yoshikawa C, Zeng N (2006) Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the (CMIP)-M−4 model intercomparison. J Climate 19:3337–3353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Follett RF, Kimble JM, Lal R (2000) The potential of U.S. grazing lands to sequester soil carbon. In: Follett RF, Kimble JM, Lal R (eds) The potential of U.S. grazing lands to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 401–430Google Scholar
  14. Guo LB, Gifford RM (2002) Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biol 8:345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IGBP (International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme) Terrestrial Carbon Working Group (1998) The terrestrial carbon cycle: implications for the Kyoto Protocol. Science 280:1393–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (1997) IPCC (Revised 1996) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Workbook. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. IPCC (2000a) Special report on land use, land use change, and forestry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (2000b) Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC (2001) Climate change: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. IPCC WGIII (2007) Summary for policy makers. Working Group III contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenkinson DS (1988) Soil organic matter and its dynamics. In: Wild A (ed) Russell’s soil conditions and plant growth, 11th Edition, Longman, London, pp 564–607Google Scholar
  22. Houghton RA (1999) The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850 to 1990. Tellus 50B:298–313Google Scholar
  23. Houghton RA, Hackler JL, Lawrence KT (1999) The US carbon budget: contributions form land-use change. Science 285:574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janzen HH (2004) Carbon cycling in earth systems – a soil science perspective. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones MB, Donnelly A (2004) Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and elevated CO2. New Phytol 164:423–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lal R (1999) Soil management and restoration for C sequestration to mitigate the accelerated greenhouse effect. Prog Environ Sci 1:307–326Google Scholar
  27. Lal R (2001) Potential of desertification control to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Clim Change 15:35–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lal R (2004a) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lal R (2004b) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lal R, Kimble JM, Follet RF, Cole CV (1998) The potential of U.S. cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MIGoogle Scholar
  31. Lohila A, Aurela M, Tuovinen JP, Laurila T (2004) Annual CO2 exchange of a peat field growing spring barley or perennial forage grass. J Geophys Res: 109, D18116, doi: 10.1029/2004JD004715
  32. Malhi Y, Meir P, Brown S (2002) Forests, carbon and global climate. Phil Trans Royal Soc London, A 360:1567–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maljanen M, Martikainen PJ, Walden J, Silvola J (2001) CO2 exchange in an organic field growing barley or grass in eastern Finland. Global Change Biol 7:679–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maljanen M, Komulainen VM, Hytonen J, Martikainen P, Laine J (2004) Carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane dynamics in boreal organic agricultural soils with different soil characteristics. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1801–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maltby E, Immirzi CP (1993) Carbon dynamics in peatlands and other wetlands soils: regional and global perspective. Chemosphere 27:999–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mann LK (1986) Changes in soil carbon storage after cultivation. Soil Sci 142:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Metting FB, Smith JL, Amthor JS (1999) Science needs and new technology for soil carbon sequestration. In: Rosenberg NJ, Izaurralde RC, Malone EL (eds) Carbon sequestration in soils: science, monitoring and beyond, Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  38. Moraes JFL de, Volkoff B, Cerri CC, Bernoux M (1995) Soil properties under Amazon forest and changes due to pasture installation in Rondônia, Brazil. Geoderma 70:63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nabuurs GJ, Daamen WP, Dolman AJ, Oenema O, Verkaik E, Kabat P, Whitmore AP, Mohren GMJ (1999) Resolving issues on terrestrial biospheric sinks in the Kyoto Protocol. Dutch National Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, Report 410 200 030 (1999)Google Scholar
  40. Neill C, Melillo JM, Steudler PA, Cerri CC, Moraes JFL de, Piccolo MC, Brito M (1997) Soil carbon and nitrogen stocks following forest clearing for pasture in the Southwestern Brazilian Amazon. Ecol Appl 7:1216–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nykänen H, Alm J, Lang K, Silvola J, Martikainen PJ (1995) Emissions of CH4, N2O and CO2 from a virgin fen and a fen drained for grassland in Finland. J Biogeogr 22:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paustian K, Andrén O, Janzen HH, Lal R, Smith P, Tian G, Tiessen H, van Noordwijk M, Woomer PL (1997) Agricultural soils as a sink to mitigate CO2 emissions. Soil Use Manage 13:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robertson GP, Paul EA, Harwood RR (2000) Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:1922–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schimel DS (1995) Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon-cycle. Global Change Biol 1:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schimel DS, House JI, Hibbard KA, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Peylin P, Braswell BH, Apps MJ, Baker D, Bondeau A, Canadell J, Churkina G, Cramer W, Denning AS, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Goodale C, Heimann M, Houghton RA, Melillo JM, Moore B, Murdiyarso D, Noble I, Pacala SW, Prentice IC, Raupach MR, Rayner PJ, Scholes RJ, Steffen WL, Wirth C (2001) Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 414:169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schlesinger WH (1999) Carbon sequestration in soils. Science 284:2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA (2000) Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry 48:7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith JU, Smith P, Wattenbach M, Zaehle S, Hiederer R, Jones RJA, Montanarella L, Rounsevell M, Reginster I, Ewert F (2005a) Projected changes in mineral soil carbon of European croplands and grasslands, 1990–2080. Global Change Biol 11:2141–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith P (2004) Soils as carbon sinks – the global context. Soil Use Manage 20:212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith P, Powlson DS (2003) Sustainability of soil management practices – a global perspective. In: Abbott LK, Murphy DV (eds) Soil biological fertility – A key to sustainable land use in agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 241–254Google Scholar
  51. Smith P, Trines E (2007) Agricultural measures for mitigating climate change: will the barriers prevent any benefits to developing countries? Int J Agric Sust 4:173–175Google Scholar
  52. Smith P, Powlson DS, Glendining MJ (1996) Establishing a European soil organic matter network (SOMNET). In: Powlson DS, Smith P, Smith JU (eds) Evaluation of soil organic matter models using existing, long-term datasets, NATO ASI Series I, vol. 38. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 81–98Google Scholar
  53. Smith P, Powlson DS, Glendining MJ, Smith JU (1997) Potential for carbon sequestration in European soils: preliminary estimates for five scenarios using results from long-term experiments. Global Change Biol 3:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith P, Falloon P, Coleman K, Smith JU, Piccolo M, Cerri CC, Bernoux M, Jenkinson DS, Ingram JSI, Szabó J, Pásztor L (1999) Modelling soil carbon dynamics in tropical ecosystems. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA (eds) Global climate change and tropical soils. Adv Soil Sci 341–364Google Scholar
  55. Smith P, Powlson DS, Smith JU, Falloon PD, Coleman K (2000) Meeting Europe’s climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture. Global Change Biol 6:525–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith P, Falloon P, Smith JU, Powlson DS (eds) (2001a) Soil organic matter network (SOMNET): 2001 Model and experimental metadata, GCTE Report 7 (2nd Edition), GCTE Focus 3 Office, Wallingford, Oxon, 224 ppGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith P, Goulding KW, Smith KA, Powlson DS, Smith JU, Falloon P, Coleman K (2001b) Enhancing the carbon sink in European agricultural soils: including trace gas fluxes in estimates of carbon mitigation potential. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 60:237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith P, Falloon PD, Körschens M, Shevtsova LK, Franko U, Romanenkov V, Coleman K, Rodionova V, Smith JU, Schramm G (2002) EuroSOMNET – a European database of long-term experiments on soil organic matter: the WWW metadatabase. J Agric Sci, Cambridge 138:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z et al (2007a) Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Phil Trans Royal Soc, B. (in press)Google Scholar
  60. Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z et al (2007b) Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:6–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stern N (2006) Stern review: the economics of climate change. Available at:
  62. Trines E, Höhne N, Jung M, Skutsch M, Petsonk A, Silva-Chavez G, Smith P, Nabuurs GJ, Verweij P, Schlamadinger b (2006) Integrating agriculture, forestry, and other land use in future climate regimes: methodological issues and policy options. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Climate Change - Scientific Assessment And Policy Analysis. Report 500102 002, 154 ppGoogle Scholar
  63. Veldkamp E (1994) Organic carbon turnover in three tropical soils under pasture after deforestation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vlek PLG, Rodríguez-Kuhl G, Sommer R (2004) Energy use and CO2 production in tropical agriculture and means and strategies for reduction or mitigation. Environ Dev Sust 6:213–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations