Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 73, Issue 2–3, pp 227–243 | Cite as

Organic Matter Management as an Underlying Cause for Soil Fertility Gradients on Smallholder Farms in Zimbabwe

  • F. Mtambanengwe
  • P. Mapfumo
Article

Abstract

Management of spatial and temporal variability of soil fertility within fields and farms is one major challenge for increasing farm-level crop productivity in smallholder agriculture. A study was conducted across 120 on-farm field sites in three agro-ecological regions of Zimbabwe to identify management factors influencing the formation of within-field/farm soil fertility gradients. Using farmer participatory research approaches, host farmers were put into three classes according to resource endowment, namely, Resource-endowed, Intermediate and Resource-constrained farmers. Each host farmer identified the most (rich) and least (poor) productive field or field section, which were then studied over two years. Farmer criteria for defining soil fertility ranged from colour through elements of soil structure to crop response following external nutrient inputs. The fertility ranking of fields consistently matched with laboratory indices, with rich fields containing significantly more soil organic carbon (SOC) and nutrients than the corresponding poor fields. Fertility gradients were evident within and across farms belonging to different farmer classes. The mean SOC content for rich fields were >6.0 g kg−1 compared with <4.6 g kg−1 for the designated poor fields. Rich fields belonging to Resource-endowed farmers had 16–28% more SOC than those belonging to their resource-constrained counterparts, suggesting differences in organic matter management. Differences in SOC and fertility status between rich and poor fields were wider in two of the study areas which had more than 70 years of cultivation in contrast to the third site which had been under smallholder farming for only 20 years, suggesting that the observed fertility gradients are a cumulative effect of years of differential management practices by different farmer classes. Analysis of potential benefits from in situ organic biomass inputs suggested that the processes of organic matter capture and utilization discriminated against Resource-constrained farmers. About 50% of in situ biomass, preferentially maize stover, was lost in three dry season months, and up to 72% of potentially recyclable N is lost from poor fields managed by Resource-constrained farmers. In contrast, Resource-endowed farmers incorporated more than 1.5 t C, 25 kg N and 5 kg P ha−1 season−1 because of their access to draught power during the early dry season. Such inputs could make a difference on these nutrient-depleted soils. Intermediate farmers represented a diverse transitional group whose size and variability could be indicative of the dynamism of technology usage. It was concluded that management of soil fertility gradients to increase crop productivity on smallholder farms hinges on increasing the capacity and efficiency with which organic matter is generated and utilized by different farmer weaclth groups across temporal scales.

Keywords

Farmer class In situ biomass Organic matter management Soil fertility gradients Soil organic carbon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agritex,  1985Extension Workers Reference Booklet: Crop Packages-Masvingo ProvinceDepartment of Agricultural Technical and Extension ServicesMinistry of Lands and AgricultureHarareZimbabweGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.M., Ingram, J.S.I. 1993Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods, 2nd ednCAB InternationalWallingfordUKGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht, A., Cadisch, G., Blanchart, E., Sitompul, S.M., Vanlauwe, B. 2004Below-ground inputs: relationships with soil quality, soil C storage and soil structurevan Noordwijk, M.Cadisch, G.Ong, C.K. eds. Below-ground Interactions Tropical Agroecosystems: concepts and Models with Multiple Plant ComponentsCABI PublishingWallingfordUK193208Google Scholar
  4. Barrios, E., Buresh, R.J., Sprent, J.I. 1996Organic matter in soil particle size and density fractions from maize and legume cropping systemsSoil Biol. Biochem.28185193Google Scholar
  5. Birch, H.F. 1964Mineralisation of plant nitrogen following alternative wet and dry conditionsPlant and Soil204349Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, B.M., Frost, P.G.H., Kirchmann, H., Swift, M. 1998A survey of soil fertility management in small-scale farming systems on north eastern ZimbabweJ. Sust. Agric.111939Google Scholar
  7. Chikowo, R., Mapfumo, P., Nyamugafata, P., Nyamadzawo, G., Giller, K.E. 2003Nitrate-N dynamics following improved fallows and maize root development in a Zimbabwean sandy clay loamAgrofor. Syst.59187195Google Scholar
  8. Chikowo, R., Mapfumo, P., Nyamugafata, P., Giller, K.E. 2004Maize productivity and mineral N dynamics following different soil fertility management practices on a depleted sandy soil in ZimbabweAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.102119131Google Scholar
  9. Chikuvire J. 1998. Socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ access to soil fertility resource and management of niches. In: Carter S. and Riley J. (eds), Biological Management of Soil Fertility in Small-Scale Farming Systems in Tropical Africa. Final Report of the EU Project Number TS3*-CT94-0337, pp.41–57.Google Scholar
  10. Food and Agricultural Organization1988Soil Map of the World. Revised LegendFAORomeItalyWorld Soil Resources Report No. 60.Google Scholar
  11. Foth, H.D. 1984Fundamentals of Soil Science10John Wiley and SonsChichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Gichuru, M.P.Bationo, A.Bekunda, M.A.Goma, H.C.Mafongoya, P.L.Mugendi, D.N.Murwira, H.M.Nandwa, S.M.Nyathi, P.Swift, M.J. eds. 2003Soil Fertility Management in Africa: A Regional PerspectiveAcademy Sciences Publishers/TSBF-CIATNairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  13. Giller, K.E. 1999Nitrogen mineralization: leaching tube protocolMutuo, P.Palm, C. eds. Combined Inorganic–Organic Nutrient Sources: Experimental Protocols for TSBF-AfNetSoilFertNet and SWNMTropical Soil Biology and FertilityNairobiKenya1719Google Scholar
  14. Giller, K.E., Cadisch, G., Ehaliotis, C., Adams, E., Sakala, W.D., Mafongoya, P.L. 1997Building soil nitrogen capital in AfricaBuresh, R.J.Sanchez, P.A.Calhoun, F. eds. Replenishing Soil Fertility in AfricaR. SSSA Special Publication 51. SSSAMadison, WI, USA151192Google Scholar
  15. Grant, P.M. 1981The fertilization of sandy soils in peasant agricultureZim. Agric. J.78169175Google Scholar
  16. Hassink, J. 1997The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their association with clay and silt particlesPlant Soil1917787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heal, O.W., Anderson, J.M., Swift, M.J. 1997Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overviewCadisch, G.Giller, K.E. eds. Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and DecompositionCAB InternationalWallingfordUK330Google Scholar
  18. Hussein J., 1988. Agroclimatological analysis of growing season in Natural Regions III, IV and V of Zimbabwe. In: Agritex (eds.) Cropping in Semi-Acid Areas of Zimbabwe. Proceedings of a workshop held in Harane 24th to 28th -August 1987. Agritex/DR&SS/GTZ-GART, Harare, Zimbabwepp. 25–189Google Scholar
  19. Joshi, L., Shrestha, P.K., Moss, C., Sinclair, F.L. 2004Locally derived knowledge of soil fertility and its emerging role in integrated natural resource managementvan Noordwijk, M. Cadisch G.Ong, C.K. eds. Below-ground Interactions in Tropical Agroecosystems: Concepts and Models with Multiple Plant ComponentsCABI PublishingWallingford, UK1740Google Scholar
  20. Mashiringwani, N.A. 1983The present nutrient status of the soils in the communal farming areas of ZimbabweZim. Agric. J.807375Google Scholar
  21. Mafongoya, P.L., Giller, K.E., Palm, C.A. 1998Decomposition and nitrogen release patterns of tree prunings and litterAgrofor. Syst.387797Google Scholar
  22. Mapfumo, P., Giller, K.E. 2001Soil fertility management strategies and practices by smallholder farmers in semi-arid areas of ZimbabweInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics with permission from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)BulawayoZimbabweGoogle Scholar
  23. Mapfumo P. and Mtambanengwe F. 1999. Nutrient mining in maize-based systems of rural Zimbabwe. In: Maize Production Technology for the Future: Challenges and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Sixth Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference21–25 September1998. CIMMYT /EARO, Addis AbabaEthiopiapp. 274–277.Google Scholar
  24. Minitab Inc. 2000. Minitab Statistical Software. Minitab Release 13.1. Minitab Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Mtambanengwe, F., Mapfumo, P., Kirchmann, H. 2004Decomposition of organic matter in soil as influenced by texture and pore size distributionBationo, A. eds. Managing Nutrient Cycles to Sustain Soil Fertility in sub-Saharan AfricaAcademy Science Publishers in association with the Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIATNairobi Kenya261275Google Scholar
  26. Mugwira L.M. and Murwira H.K. 1997. Use of Cattle Manure to Improve Soil Fertility in Zimbabwe: Past and Current Research and Future Research Needs. Network Working Paper No. 2. Soil Fertility Network for Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Zimbabwe and Malawi. CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe pp.33Google Scholar
  27. Mugwira, L., Shumba, E.M. 1984Rate of manure applied in some communal areas and their effect on plant growth and maize grain yieldsZim. Agric. J.8399104Google Scholar
  28. Murwira, H.K., Mukamuri, B.B. 1998Traditional views of soils and soil fertility in ZimbabweAdv. GeoEcol.3113671373Google Scholar
  29. Nyamapfene, K. 1991Soils of ZimbabweNehanda PublishersHarareZimbabweGoogle Scholar
  30. Nyathi, P., Campbell, B.M. 1993The acquisition and use of miombo litter by small-scale farmers in MasvingoZimbabweAgrofor. Syst.224348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Page, A.L.Miller, R.H.Keeney, D.R. eds. 1982Methods of Soil Analyses, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd ednAgronomy 9. American Society of AgronomyMadisonGoogle Scholar
  32. Palm, C.A., Myers, R.J.K., Nandwa, S.M. 1997Combined use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources for soil fertility maintenance and replenishmentBuresh, R.J.Sanchez, P.A. eds. Replenishing Soil Fertility in AfricaSSSA Special␣Publication 51. SSSAMadison, WI, USA193217Google Scholar
  33. Palm, C.A., Giller, K.E., Mafongoya, P.L., Swift, M.J. 2001aManagement of organic matter in the tropics: translating theory into practiceNutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.616375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palm, C.A., Gachengo, C.N., Delve, R.J., Cadisch, G., Giller, K.E. 2001bOrganic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: application of an organic resource databaseAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.832742Google Scholar
  35. Quarmby, C., Allen, S.E. 1989Organic constituentsAllen, S.E. eds. Chemical Analyses of Ecological Materials, 2nd ednBlackwell Scientific PublicationOxfordUK160200Google Scholar
  36. Scoones, I., Chibudu, C., Chikura, S., Jeranyama, P., Machaka, D., Machanja, W., Mavedzenge, B., Mombeshora, B., Mudhara, M., Mudziwo, C., Murimbarimba, F., Zirereza, B. 1996Hazards and Opportunities. Farming Livelihoods in Dryland Africa: Lessons from ZimbabweZed Books LtdLondon and New Jersey, in association with International Institute for Environment and DevelopmentLondon, UK267Google Scholar
  37. Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., Paustian, K. 2002Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soilsPlant Soil241155176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smaling, E.M.A., Nandwa, S.M., Jansen, B.H. 1997Soil fertility in Africa is at stakeBuresh, R.J.Sanchez, P.A.Calhoun, F. eds. Replenishing Soil Fertility in AfricaSoil Science Society of America Publication 51. SSSA and ASAMadison, USA4761Google Scholar
  39. Smaling, E.M.A., Stoorvogel, J.J., de Jager, A. 2002Decision making on integrated nutrient management through the eyes of the scientistthe land-user and the policy makerVanlauwe, B.Diels, J.Sanginga, N.Merckx, R. eds. Integrated Plant Nutrient Management in sub-Saharan Africa: From Concept to PracticeCABI Publishing in association with the International Institute of Tropical AgricultureWallingfordUK265280Google Scholar
  40. Stanford, G., Smith, S.J. 1972Nitrogen mineralization potentials of soilsSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.36465472Google Scholar
  41. Stotzky, G. 1965Microbial respirationBlack, C.A. eds. Methods of Soil Analysis. Vol. 2American Society of Agronomy, Monograph No. 9Madison, USA15501572Google Scholar
  42. Swift M.J., Frost P.G.H., Campbell B.M., Hatton J.C. and Wilson K.B. 1989. Nitrogen cycling in farming systems derived from savanna: perspectives and challenges. In: Clarholm M. and Bergstrom L. (eds), Ecology of Arable Land. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.63–76.Google Scholar
  43. Swift, M.J. 1998Ten years of soil fertility research: where next?Bergstrom, L.Kirchmann, H. eds. Carbon and Nutrient Dynamics in Natural and Agricultural Tropical EcosystemsCAB InternationalWallingfordUK303312Google Scholar
  44. Vanlauwe, B., Dendooven, L., Merckx, R. 1994Residue fractionation and decomposition: the significance of the active fractionPlant and Soil158263274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waddington S. (ed) 2003. Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in Southern Africa: Taking Stock of Progress. Proceedings of a Conference held 8–11 October, 2002 at the Leopard Rock Hotel, Vumba, Zimbabwe. Soil Fert Net and CIMMYT-Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
  46. Woomer, P.L., Martin, A., Albrecht, A., Resck, D.V.S., Scharpenseel, H.W. 1994The importance and management of soil organic matter in the tropicsWoomer, P.L.Swift, M.J. eds. The Biological Management of Tropical Soil FertilityWiley-SayceChichesterUK4780Google Scholar
  47. Woomer, P.L.Swift, M.J. eds. 1994The Biological Management of Tropical Soil FertilityWiley-SayceChichesterUKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Soil Science and Agricultural EngineeringUniversity of ZimbabweHarareZimbabwe

Personalised recommendations