Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 173–187 | Cite as

Quantifying the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions as a Resultof Composting Dairy and Beef Cattle Manure

  • E. PatteyEmail author
  • M. K. Trzcinski
  • R. L. Desjardins


Greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector can be reduced through implementation of improved management practices. For example, the choice of manure storage method should be based on environmental decision criteria, as well as production capacity. In this study, greenhouse gas emissions from three methods of storing dairy and beef cattle manure were compared during the summer period. The emissions of CH4, N2O and CO2 from manure stored as slurry, stockpile, and compost were measured using a flow-through closed chamber. The largest combined N2O–CH4 emissions in CO2 equivalent were observed from the slurry storage, followed by the stockpile and lastly the passively aerated compost. This ranking was governed by CH4 emissions in relation to the degree of aerobic conditions within the manure. The radiative forcing in CO2 equivalent from the stockpiled manure was 1.46 times higher than from the compost for both types of cattle manure. It was almost twice as high from the dairy cattle manure slurry and four to seven times higher from the beef cattle manure slurry than from the compost. The potential reduction of GHG was estimated, by extrapolating the results of the study to all of Canada. By composting all the cattle manure stored as slurry and stockpile, a reduction of 0.70 Tg CO2-eq year−1 would be achieved. Similarly, by collecting and burning CH4 emissions from existing slurry facilities, a reduction of 0.76 Tg CO2-eq year−1 would be achieved. New CH4 emission factors were estimated based on these results and incorporated into the IPCC methodology. For North-America under cool conditions, the CH4 emission factors would be 45 kg CH4 hd−1 year−1 for dairy cattle manure rather than 36 kg CH4 hd−1 year−1, and 3 kg CH4 hd−1 year−1 for beef cattle manure rather than 1 kg CH4 hd−1 year−1.

Key words

Beef cattle Dairy cattle Emission factors Greenhouse gas emissions Manure Methane Nitrous oxide 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amon, B., Amon, T., Boxberger, J., Alt, C. 2001Emissions of NH3N2O and CH4 from dairy cows housed in a farmyard manure tying stall (housing, manure storagemanure spreading)Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.60103113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boehm, M., Junkins, B., Desjardins, R.L., Kulshreshtha, S.N., Lindwall, W. 2004Sink potential of Canadian agricultural soilsClim. Change65297314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Desjardins, R.L., Riznek, R. 2000Agricultural greenhouse gas budgetMcRae, T.Smith, C.A.S.Gregorich, L.J. eds. Environmental Sustainability of Canadian Agriculture. Report of the Agri-Environmental Indicator ProjectAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaOttawaCanada133140Google Scholar
  4. Desjardins, R.L., Kulshreshtha, S.N., Junkins, B., Smith, W., Grant, B., Boehm, M. 2001Canadian greenhouse gas mitigation options in CanadaNutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.60317326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engler C.R., Jordan E.R., McFarland M.J. and Lacewell R.D. 2003. Economics and environmental impact of biogas production as a manure management strategy. 109–114.Google Scholar
  6. Gaudy, A.F.,Jr., Gaudy, E.T. 1988Elements of Bio-Environmental EngineeringEngineering PressSan JoseCaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  7. Hao, X., Chang, C., Larney, F.J., Travis, G.R. 2001Greenhouse gas emissions during cattle feedlot manure compostingJ. Environ. Qual.30376386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayes, L.A., Richards, R., Mathur, S.P. 1993Economic Viability of Commercial Composting of Fisheries Waste by Passive Aeration at Shigawake Organics and Genesis OrganicEnvironment CanadaMontreal, CanadaProceedings of the Composting Council of Canada3rd Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  9. Husted, S. 1994Seasonal variation in methane emission from stored slurry and solid manuresJ. Environ. Qual.23585592Google Scholar
  10. Hutchinson, G.L., Livingston, G.P. 1993Use of chamber systems to measure trace gas fluxesHarper, L.A.Mosier, A.R.Duxbury, J.M.Rolston, D.E. eds. Agricultural Ecosystem Effects on Trace Gases and Global Climate ChangeASA Publication Number 55. Amer. Soc. AgronMadison, Wisconsin6378Google Scholar
  11. Keeney, D.R., Nelson, D.W. 1982Nitrogen-inorganic formsPage, A.L.Miller, R.H.Keeney, D.R. eds. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological PropertiesAmer. Soc. Agron. MadisonWisconsin643698Google Scholar
  12. Knowles, R. 1993Methane: processes of production and consumptionHarper, L.A.Mosier, A.R.Duxbury, J.M.Rolston, D.E. eds. Agricultural Ecosystem Effects on Trace Gases and Global Climate ChangeASA Publication Number 55. Amer. Soc. AgronMadison, Wisconsin145156Google Scholar
  13. Kulling, D.R., Dohme, F., Menzi, H., Sutter, F., Lischer, P., Kreuzer, M. 2002Methane emissions of differently fed dairy cows and corresponding methane and nitrogen emissions from their manure during storageEnviron. Monit. and Assess.79129150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kulling, D.R., Menzi, H., Sutter, F., Lischer, P., Kreuzer, M. 2003Ammonianitrous oxide and methane emissions from differently stored dairy manure derived from grass- and hay-based rationsNutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.651322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lessard, R., Rochette, P., Gregorich, E.G., Desjardins, R.L., Pattey, E. 1997CH4 fluxes from a soil amended with dairy cattle manure and ammonium nitrateCan. J. Soil Sci.77179188Google Scholar
  16. Lessard, R., Rochette, P., Gregorich, E.G., Pattey, E., Desjardins, R.L. 1996Nitrous oxide fluxes from manure-amended soil under maizeJ. Environ. Qual.2513711377Google Scholar
  17. Martin J.H.Jr. 2003. A Comparison of Dairy Cattle Manure Management with and without Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Utilization. Report for the AgSTAR Program U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Contract #68-W7-0068 Task Order400: 58pp.Google Scholar
  18. Mathur, S.P. 1991Composting processesMartin, A.M. eds. Bioconversion of Waste Materials to Industrial ProductsElsevierLondon147186Google Scholar
  19. Mathur, S.P. 1992Agriculture Canada's Passively Aerated Windrow System of Composting FarmFood and Industrial WastesEnvironment CanadaOttawaCanadaProceedings of the Composting Council of Canada2nd Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  20. O’Brien, R.G., Kaiser, M.K. 1985MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primerPsych. Bull.97316333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Overcash, M.R., Humenik, F.J., Miner, J.R. 1983Livestock Waste Management IICRC Press IncBoca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  22. Paul, J.W., Zebarth, B.J. 1997Denitrification during the growing season following dairy cattle slurry and fertilizer application for silage cornCan. J. Soil Sci.77241248Google Scholar
  23. Potvin, C., Lechowicz, M.J., Tardif, S. 1990The statistical analysis of ecophysiological response curves obtained from experiments involving repeated measuresEcology7113891400Google Scholar
  24. SAS 1990. Version 6.09. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  25. Rochette, P., Ellert, B., Gregorich, E.G., Desjardins, R.L., Pattey, E., Lessard, R., Johnson, B.G. 1997Description of a dynamic closed chamber for measuring soil respiration and its comparison with other techniquesCan. J. Soil Sci.77195203Google Scholar
  26. Rochette, P., Bochove, E., Prévost, D., Angers, D.A., Côté, D., Bertrand, N. 2000Soil Carbon and Nitrogen dynamics following application of pig slurry for the 19th consecutive year: II. Nitrous oxide fluxes and mineral nitrogenSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.6413961403Google Scholar
  27. Sommer, S.G., Petersen, S.O., Moller, H.B. 2004Algorithms for calculating methane And nitrous oxide emissions from manure managementNutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.69143154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sommer, S.G., Petersen, S.O., Sogaard, H.T. 2000Atmospheric pollutants and trace gasesJ. Environ. Qual.29744751Google Scholar
  29. Statistics Canada 2003. Farm Environmental Management in Canada. Catalogue no. 21-021-MIE52pp. ( Google Scholar
  30. Stevens, J. 1992Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences2Lawrence ErlbaumHillsdaleNew JerseyGoogle Scholar
  31. Su, J-J., Liu, B-J., Chang, Y-C. 2003Emission of greenhouse gas from livestock waste and wastewater treatment in TiawanAgric. Ecosyst. Env.95253263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Svensson, B.H., Lantsheer, J.C., Rodhe, H. 1991Sources and sinks of methane in SwedenAmbio20155160Google Scholar
  33. Ende, , C.N.,  1993Repeated-measures analysis: growth and other time-dependent measuresScheiner, S.M.Gurevitch, J. eds. Design and Analysis of Ecological ExperimentsChapman and HallNew York, New York113137Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Pattey
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. K. Trzcinski
    • 2
  • R. L. Desjardins
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations