Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 71, Issue 2, pp 163–175 | Cite as

A farm level approach to define successful mitigation strategies for GHG emissions from ruminant livestock systems

  • R. L. M. Schils
  • A. Verhagen
  • H. F. M. Aarts
  • L. B. J. Šebek
Article

Abstract

Ruminant livestock systems are a significant source of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Thus far, mitigation options for GHG emissions mainly focused on a single gas, and are treated as isolated activities. The present paper proposes a framework for a farm level approach for the full accounting of GHG emissions. The methodology accounts for the relevant direct and indirect emissions of methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide, including carbon sequestration. Furthermore, the potential trade-off with ammonia volatilisation and nitrate leaching are taken into account. A ruminant livestock farm is represented with a conceptual model consisting of five pools: animal, manure, soil, crop and feed. The carbon and nitrogen inputs, throughputs and outputs are described, and the direct emissions are related to the carbon and nitrogen flows. The indirect emissions included in the methodology are mainly carbon dioxide emissions from energy use and nitrous oxide emissions related to imported resources and nitrogen losses. The whole farm approach is illustrated with a case of two dairy farms with contrasting livestock density and grassland management. It is shown that the inclusion of carbon sequestration and all indirect emissions have a major impact on the GHG budget of the farm. For one farm, the effect of four mitigation options on the GHG emissions was quantified. It was concluded that a whole farm approach of full accounting contributes to a better insight in the interactions between the carbon and nitrogen flows and the resulting emissions, within and outside the farm boundaries. Consequently, the methodology can be used to develop efficient and effective mitigation strategies.

Keywords

Carbon sequestration Dairy Farm management Greenhouse gases IPCC Methodology Nitrogen Ruminants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, L., Jarvis, S.C., Headon, D. 2001A farm-scale basis for predicting nitrous oxide emissions from dairy farmsNutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.60149158Google Scholar
  2. Bussink, D.W. 1992Ammonia volatilization from grassland receiving nitrogen-fertilizer and rotationally grazed by dairy-cattleFert. Res.33257265Google Scholar
  3. Bussink, D.W. 1994Relationships between ammonia volatilization and nitrogen-fertilizer application rateintake and excretion of herbage nitrogen by cattle on grazed swardsFert. Res.38111121Google Scholar
  4. Corré, W.J. 2002Agricultural Land Use and Emissions of Methane and Nitrous oxide in EuropePlant Research InternationalWageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  5. CVB2002Tabellenboek veevoedingCentraal veevoederbureauLelystad The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. Haan, M.H.A. 2001Economics of environmental measures on experimental farm ‘De Marke’Neth. J. Agric. Sci.49179194Google Scholar
  7. Mol, R.M., Hilhorst, M.A. 2003Methaan-, lachgas- en ammoniakemissie bij productieopslag en transport van mestInstituut voor Milieu- en AgritechniekWageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Estavillo, J.M., Merino, P., Pinto, M., Yamulki, S., Gebauer, G., Sapek, A., Corre, W. 2002Short term effect of ploughing a permanent pasture on N2O production from nitrification and denitrificationPlant Soil239253265Google Scholar
  9. EUROSTAT 2003. Between 1990 and 2000, European Agriculture has reduced its Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 6.4%. Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxemburg.Google Scholar
  10. Flessa, H., Pfau, W., Dorsch, P., Beese, F. 1996The influence of nitrate and ammonium fertilization on N2O release and CH4 uptake of a well-drained topsoil demonstrated by a soil microcosm experimentZ. Pflanzen. Bodenk.159499503Google Scholar
  11. Freibauer, A. 2003Regionalised inventory of biogenic greenhouse gas emissions from European agricultureEur. J. Agron.19135160Google Scholar
  12. Hageman, I.W. 1994Invloed bedrijfsfactoren op energieverbruik melkveebedrijvenProefstation voor de Rundveehouderij, Schapenhouderij en PaardenhouderijLelystadThe NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. Henry, G.M., Delorenzo, M.A., Beede, D.K., Vanhorn, H.H., Moss, C.B., Boggess, W.G. 1995Determining optimal nutrient management strategies for dairy farmsJ. Dairy Sci.78693703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huijsmans, J.F.M., Hol, J.M.G., Hendriks, M.M.W.B. 2001Effect of application techniquemanure characteristics, weather and field conditions on ammonia volatilization from manure applied to grasslandNeth. J. Agric. Sci.49323342Google Scholar
  15. IPCC 1997. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGenevaSwitzerland.Google Scholar
  16. Kurmies, B. 1949Humusbestimmung nach dem Bichromaatverfahren ohne KaliumjodidZ. Pflanzen. Bodenk.44121125Google Scholar
  17. Maw, S.J., Johnson, C.L., Lewis, A.C., McQuaid, J.B. 2002A note on the emission of nitrogen oxides from silage in opened bunker silosEnviron. Monit. Assess.74209215Google Scholar
  18. Mosier, A.R., Duxbury, J.M., Freney, J.R., Heinemeyer, O., Minami, K., Johnson, D.E. 1998Mitigating agricultural emissions of methaneClim. Change403980Google Scholar
  19. Oborn, I., Edwards, A.C., Witter, E., Oenema, O., Ivarsson, K., Withers, P.J.A., Nilsson, S.I., Stinzing, A.R. 2003Element balances as a tool for sustainable nutrient management: a critical appraisal of their merits and limitations within an agronomic and environmental contextEur. J. Agron.20211225Google Scholar
  20. Oenema, O., Velthof, G., Verdoes, N., Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G., Monteny, G.J., Bannink, A., Van der Meer, H.G., Hoek, K.W. 2000Forfaitaire waarden voor gasvormige stikstofverliezen uit stallen en mestopslagenAlterraWageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  21. Oenema, J., Koskamp, G.J., Galama, P.J. 2001aGuiding commercial pilot farms to bridge the gap between experimental and commercial dairy farms; the project ‘Cows & Opportunities’Neth. J. Agric. Sci.49277296Google Scholar
  22. Oenema, O., Velthof, G., Kuikman, P. 2001bTechnical and policy aspects of strategies to decrease greenhouse gas emissions from agricultureNutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.60301315Google Scholar
  23. PR 1997. Handboek melkveehouderij. Praktijkonderzoek RundveeSchapen en Paarden, LelystadThe Netherlands.Google Scholar
  24. Schils, R.L.M. 1994Nitrate losses from grazed grass and grass/clover pastures on clay soilMeststoffen19947884Google Scholar
  25. Schils, R.L.M., Aarts, H.F.M., Bussink, D.W., Conijn, J.G., Corre, W.J., Dam, A.M., Hoving, I.E., Meer, H.G., Velthof, G. 2002

    Grassland renovation in the Netherlands; agronomic, environmental and economic issues

    Conijn, J.G.Velthof, G.Taube, F. eds. Grassland Resowing and Grass-arable Crop RotationsPlant Research InternationalWageningen, The Netherlands92418–19 April
    Google Scholar
  26. Schils, R.L.M., Boxem, T.J., Jagtenberg, C.J., Verboon, M.C. 2000aThe performance of a white clover based dairy system in comparison with a grass/fertiliser-N system. II. Animal production, economics and environmentNeth. J. Agric. Sci.48305318Google Scholar
  27. Schils, R.L.M., Boxem, T.J., Sikkema, K., Andre, G. 2000bThe performance of a white clover based dairy system in comparison with a grass/fertiliser-N system. I. Botanical composition and sward utilisationNeth. J. Agric. Sci.48291303Google Scholar
  28. Smith, P., Powlson, D.S., Glendining, M.J., Smith, J.U. 1998

    Opportunities and limitations for C sequestration in European agricultural soils through changes in management

    Lal, R.Kimble, J.M.Follett, R.F.Stewart, B.A. eds. Management of Carbon Sequestration in SoilCRC PressNew York143152
    Google Scholar
  29. Sommer, S.G., Jensen, C. 1994Ammonia volatilization from urea and ammoniacal fertilizers surface applied to winter-wheat and grasslandFert. Res.378592Google Scholar
  30. Soussana, J.F., Loiseau, P., Vuichard, N., Ceschia, E., Balesdent, J., Chevallier, T. 2004Carbon cycling and sequestration opportunities in temperate grasslandsSoil Use Manage20219230Google Scholar
  31. Spakman, J., Loon, M.M.J., Der Auweraert, R.J.K., Gielen, D.J., Olivier, J.G.J., Zonneveld, E.A. 2003Methode voor de berekening van broeikasgasemissiesMinisterie van VolksgezondheidRuimtelijke Ordening en MilieuDen Haag, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  32. Stevens, R.J., Laughlin, R.J. 2002Cattle slurry applied before fertilizer nitrate lowers nitrous oxide and dinitrogen emissionsSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.66647652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. UNFCCC 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. www.unfccc.int.Google Scholar
  34. R.J. Unwin T.V. Vellinga 1994 Fertiliser recommendations for intensively managed grassland Proceedings of the 15th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation Wageningen Press, Grassland and Society 590 602Google Scholar
  35. Dasselaar, A., Pothoven, R. 1994Energieverbruik in de landbouw; Vergelijk van verschillende bemestingsstrategiënNutrienten Management Instituut (NMI)Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Den Pol-Van Dasselaar A. 1998. Methane emissions from grasslands. Ph.D. Thesis. Wageningen University. The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  37. Meer, H.G., Baan Hofman, T. 1989

    Contribution of legumes to yield and nitrogen economy of leys on a biodynamic farm

    Plancquart, P.Haggar, R. eds. Legumes in Farming SystemsEECBrussels, Belgium2536
    Google Scholar
  38. Evert, F.K., Ten Berge, H.F., Meer, H.G., Rutgers, B., Schut, A.G., Ketelaars, J.J. 2003FARMMIN: Modeling Crop-Livestock Nutrient FlowsASA-CSSA-SSSAMadison, WIAnnual Meetings Abstracts (on CD), November 2–6.Google Scholar
  39. Velthof, G., De Haan, M.H., Holshof, G., Van Den Pol-Van Dasselaar, A., Kuikman, P. 2000aBeperking van lachgasemissie uit beweid grasland. Rapport 114.lAlterraWageningen, The Netherlands69Google Scholar
  40. Velthof, G., De Haan, M.H., Schils, R.L.M., Monteny, G.J., Van Den Pol-Van Dasselaar, A., Kuikman, P. 2000bBeperking van lachgasemissie uit bemeste landbouwgronden. Rapport 114.2AlterraWageningen, The Netherlands54Google Scholar
  41. Velthof, G.L., Oenema, O. 1997Nitrous oxide emission from dairy farming systems in the NetherlandsNeth. J. Agric. Sci.45347360Google Scholar
  42. Velthof, G.L., van Beusichem, M.L., Oenema, O. 1998Mitigation of nitrous oxide emission from dairy farming systemsEnviron. Pollut.102173178Google Scholar
  43. Vleeshouwers, L.M., Verhagen, A. 2002Carbon emission and sequestration by agricultural land use: a model study for EuropeGlobal Change Biol.8519530Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. M. Schils
    • 1
  • A. Verhagen
    • 1
  • H. F. M. Aarts
    • 1
  • L. B. J. Šebek
    • 2
  1. 1.Agrosystems ResearchPlant Research InternationalAA WageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Applied ResearchAnimal Sciences GroupAD LelystadThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations