Advertisement

A phase field approach for damage propagation in periodic microstructured materials

  • F. FantoniEmail author
  • A. Bacigalupo
  • M. Paggi
  • J. Reinoso
Original Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

In the present work, the evolution of damage in periodic composite materials is investigated through a novel finite element-based multiscale computational approach. The proposed methodology is developed by means of the original combination of asymptotic homogenization with the phase field approach to nonlocal damage. This last is applied at the macroscale level on the equivalent homogeneous continuum, whose constitutive properties are obtained in closed form via a two-scale asymptotic homogenization scheme. The formulation considers different assumptions on the evolution of damage at the microscale (e.g., damage in the matrix and not in the inclusion/fiber), as well as the role played by the microstructural reinforcement, i.e. its volumetric content and shape. Numerical results show that the proposed formulation leads to an apparent tensile strength and a post-peak branch of unnotched and notched specimens dependent not only on the internal length scale of the phase field approach, as for homogeneous materials, but also on microstructural features. Down-scaling relations provide the full reconstruction of the microscopic fields at any point of the macroscopic model, as a simple post-processing operation.

Keywords

Periodic microstructured material Asymptotic homogenization scheme Phase field approach 

Notes

Acknowledgements

AB would like to acknowledge the financial support by National Group of Mathematical Physics (GNFM-INdAM). MP would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research to the Research Project of National Interest (PRIN 2017: “XFAST-SIMS: Extra fast and accurate simulation of complex structural systems” (CUP: D68D19001260001)). The authors would like to thank the IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca for its support to the stays of FF and JR in the IMT Campus as visiting researchers in 2019, making possible the realization of this joint work.

References

  1. Addessi D, De Bellis M, Sacco E (2013) Micromechanical analysis of heterogeneous materials subjected to overall cosserat strains. Mech Res Commun 54:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allaire G (1992) Homogenization and two-scale convergence. SIAM J Math Anal 23:1482–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2015) Phase-field modeling of ductile fracture. Comput Mech 55(5):1017–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrianov I, Bolshakov V, Danishevsḱyy V, Weichert D (2008) Higher order asymptotic homogenization and wave propagation in periodic composite materials. Proc R Soc Lond 464(2093):1181–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Areias P, Rabczuk T, Msekh M (2016) Phase-field analysis of finite-strain plates and shells including element subdivision. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:322–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arteiro A, Catalanotti G, Melro AR, Linde P, Camanho PP (2015) Micro-mechanical analysis of the effect of ply thickness on the transverse compressive strength of polymer composites. Compos Part A 79:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bacca M, Bigoni D, Dal Corso F, Veber D (2013a) Mindlin second-gradient elastic properties from dilute two-phase cauchy-elastic composites. Part i: closed form expression for the effective higher-order constitutive tensor. Int J Solids Struct 50(24):4010–4019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bacca M, Bigoni D, Dal Corso F, Veber D (2013b) Mindlin second-gradient elastic properties from dilute two-phase cauchy-elastic composites part ii: higher-order constitutive properties and application cases. Int J Solids Struct 50(24):4020–4029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bacca M, Dal Corso F, Veber D, Bigoni D (2013c) Anisotropic effective higher-order response of heterogeneous cauchy elastic materials. Mech Res Commun 54:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bacigalupo A (2014) Second-order homogenization of periodic materials based on asymptotic approximation of the strain energy: formulation and validity limits. Meccanica 49(6):1407–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bacigalupo A, Gambarotta L (2010) Micro-polar and second order homogenization of periodic masonry. Mater Sci Forum Trans Tech Publ 638:2561–2566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bacigalupo A, Gambarotta L (2013) A multi-scale strain-localization analysis of a layered strip with debonding interfaces. Int J Solids Struct 50(13):2061–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bacigalupo A, Gambarotta L (2014a) Computational dynamic homogenization for the analysis of dispersive waves in layered rock masses with periodic fractures. Comput Geotech 56:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bacigalupo A, Gambarotta L (2014b) Second-gradient homogenized model for wave propagation in heterogeneous periodic media. Int J Solids Struct 51(5):1052–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bacigalupo A, Morini L, Piccolroaz A (2014) Effective elastic properties of planar sofcs: a non-local dynamic homogenization approach. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39(27):15017–15030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bakhvalov N, Panasenko G (1984) Homogenization: averaging processes in periodic media. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Bazant Z, Jirasek M (2002) Non local integral formulations of plasticity and damage: survey of progress. ASCE J Eng Mech 128(11):1119–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bažant ZP, Jirásek M (2002) Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage: survey of progress. J Eng Mech 128(11):1119–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bensoussan A, Lions J, Papanicolaou G (1978) Asymptotic analysis for periodic structures. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. Bigoni D, Drugan W (2007) Analytical derivation of cosserat moduli via homogenization of heterogeneous elastic materials. J Appl Mech 74(4):741–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bleyer J, Alessi R (2018) Phase-field modeling of anisotropic brittle fracture including several damage mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 336:213–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bourdin B, Francfort G, Marigo J (2008) The variational approach to fracture. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo J-J (2000) Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 48(4):797–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Boutin C (1996) Microstructural effects in elastic composites. Int J Solids Struct 33:1023–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Camacho G, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33:2899–2938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carollo V, Reinoso J, Paggi M (2018) Modeling complex crack paths in ceramic laminates: a novel variational framework combining the phase field method of fracture and the cohesive zone model. J Eur Ceramic Soc 38(8):2994–3003 cermodel 2017: Modelling and Simulation Meet Innovation in Ceramics TechnologyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Comi C (1999) Computational modelling of gradient-enhanced damage in quasi-brittle materials. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 4(1):17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Bellis ML, Addessi D (2011) A cosserat based multi-scale model for masonry structures. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 9(5):543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Del Toro R, Bacigalupo A, Paggi M (2019) Characterization of wave propagation in periodic viscoelastic materials via asymptotic-variational homogenization. Int J Solids Struct 172:110–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dimitrijevic B, Hackl K (2011) A regularization framework for damage-plasticity models via gradient enhancement of the free energy. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 27:1199–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dirrenberger J, Samuel F, Dominique J (2019) Computational homogenization of architectured materials. Architectured materials in nature and engineering. Springer, Cham, pp 89–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fantoni F, Bacigalupo A, Paggi M (2017) Multi-field asymptotic homogenization of thermo-piezoelectric materials with periodic microstructure. Int J Solids Struct 120:31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fantoni F, Bacigalupo A, Paggi M (2018) Design of thermo-piezoelectric microstructured bending actuators via multi-field asymptotic homogenization. Int J Mech Sci 146:319–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Feyel F (2003) A multilevel finite element method (fe2) to describe the response of highly non-linear structures using generalized continua. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(28–30):3233–3244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forest S (2002) Homogenization methods and the mechanics of generalized continua-part 2. Theor Appl Mech 28(29):113–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Forest S, Sab K (1998) Cosserat overall modeling of heterogeneous materials. Mech Res Commun 25(4):449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Forest S, Trinh D (2011) Generalized continua and non-homogeneous boundary conditions in homogenisation methods. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech 91(2):90–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Francfort G, Marigo J (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46:1319–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gambin B, Kröner E (1989) Higher order terms in the homogenized stress-strain relation of periodic elastic media. Physica status solidi (b). Int J Eng Sci 151(2):513–519Google Scholar
  40. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 221:163–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Guillén-Hernández T, García IG, Reinoso J, Paggi M (2019) A micromechanical analysis of inter-fiber failure in long reinforced composites based on the phase field approach of fracture combined with the cohesive zone model. Int J Fract.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-019-00384-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gültekin O, Dal H, Holzapfel GA (2018) Numerical aspects of anisotropic failure in soft biological tissues favor energy-based criteria: a rate-dependent anisotropic crack phase-field model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 331:23–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hansen-Dörr AC, de Borst R, Hennig P, Kästner M (2019) Phase-field modelling of interface failure in brittle materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 346:25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Herráez M, Mora D, Naya F, Lopes CS, González C, LLorca J (2015) Transverse cracking of cross-ply laminates: a computational micromechanics perspective. Compos Sci Technol 110:196–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hubert JS, Palencia ES (1992) Introduction aux méthodes asymptotiques et à l’homogénéisation: application à la mécanique des milieux continus. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaczmarczyk L, Pearce CJ, Bićanić N (2008) Scale transition and enforcement of rve boundary conditions in second-order computational homogenization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 74(3):506–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Khisamitov I, Meschke G (2018) Variational approach to interface element modeling of brittle fracture propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 328:452–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kouznetsova V, Geers M, Brekelmans W (2002) Advanced constitutive modeling of heterogeneous materials with a gradient-enhanced computational homogenization scheme. Int J Numer Methods Eng 54:1235–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kouznetsova V, Geers M, Brekelmans W (2004) Multi-scale second-order computational homogenization of multi-phase materials: a nested finite element solution strategy. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(48):5525–5550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kuhn C, Müller R (2014) Simulation of size effects by a phase field model for fracture. Theor Appl Mech Lett 4(5):051008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Linder C, Armero F (2007) Finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities for the modeling of failure in solids. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72:1391–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Linse T, Hennig P, Kästner M, de Borst R (2017) A convergence study of phase-field models for brittle fracture. Eng Fract Mech 184:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maimí P, Camanho P, Mayugo J, Dávila C (2007) A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part I—constitutive model. Mech Mater 39:897–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mantič V, García IG (2012) Crack onset and growth at the fibre-matrix interface under a remote biaxial transverse load. Application of a coupled stress and energy criterion. Int J Solids Struct 49(17):2273–2290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Martínez-Pañeda E, Golahmar A, Niordson CF (2018) A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 342:742–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meguid S, Kalamkarov A (1994) Asymptotic homogenization of elastic composite materials with a regular structure. Int J Solids Struct 31:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miehe C, Aldakheel F, Raina A (2016) Phase field modeling of ductile fracture at finite strains: a variational gradient-extended plasticity-damage theory. Int J Plast 84:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miehe C, Hofacker M, Schänzel L-M, Aldakheel F (2015a) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part ii. Coupled brittle-to-ductile failure criteria and crack propagation in thermo-elastic-plastic solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 294:486–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010a) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45):2765–2778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010b) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45–48):2765–2778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miehe C, Mauthe S, Ulmer H (2014) Formulation and numerical exploitation of mixed variational principles for coupled problems of Cahn-Hilliard-type and standard diffusion in elastic solids. Int J Numer Methods Eng 99:737–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miehe C, Schänzel L, Ulmer H (2015b) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part i. Balance of crack surface and failure criteria for brittle crack propagation in thermo-elastic solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 294:449–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010c) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field fe implementations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(10):1273–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moes N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46:131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nguyen T-T, Yvonnet J, Bornert M, Chateau C, Sab K, Romani R, Le Roy R (2016a) On the choice of parameters in the phase field method for simulating crack initiation with experimental validation. Int J Fract 197(2):213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nguyen TT, Yvonnet J, Bornert M, Chateau C, Sab K, Romani R, Le Roy R (2016b) On the choice of parameters in the phase field method for simulating crack initiation with experimental validation. Int J Fract 197(2):213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nguyen T-T, Yvonnet J, Zhu Q-Z, Bornert M, Chateau C (2016c) A phase-field method for computational modeling of interfacial damage interacting with crack propagation in realistic microstructures obtained by microtomography. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:567–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Oliver J, Huespe A, Blanco S, Linero D (2006) Stability and robustness issues in numerical modeling of material failure with the strong discontinuity approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:7093–7114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44:1267–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ostoja-Starzewski M, Boccara SD, Jasiuk I (1999) Couple-stress moduli and characteristic length of a two-phase composite. Mech Res Commun 26(4):387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Otero F, Oller S, Martinez X (2018) Multiscale computational homogenization: review and proposal of a new enhanced-first-order method. Arch Comput Methods Eng 25(2):479–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Paggi M, Corrado M, Reinoso J (2018) Fracture of solar-grade anisotropic polycrystalline silicon: a combined phase field-cohesive zone model approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 330:123–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Paggi M, Reinoso J (2017) Revisiting the problem of a crack impinging on an interface: a modeling framework for the interaction between the phase field approach for brittle fracture and the interface cohesive zone model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 321:145–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Paggi M, Wriggers P (2012) Stiffness and strength of hierarchical polycrystalline materials with imperfect interfaces. J Mech Phys Solids 60(4):557–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Panasenko G (2009) Boundary conditions for the high order homogenized equation: laminated rods, plates and composites. Comptes Rendus MEcanique 337(1):8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Peerlings R, Geers M, De R, Brekelmans W (2001) A critical comparison of nonlocal and gradient-enhanced softening continua. Int J Solids Struct 38:7723–7746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pham K, Amor H, Marigo J, Maurini C (2011) Gradient damage models and their use to approximate brittle fracture. Int J Damage Mech 20(4):618–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pham K, Marigo J (2013) From the onset of damage to rupture: construction of responses with damage localization for a general class of gradient damage models. Continu Mech Thermodyn 25(2):147–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Quintanas-Corominas A, Reinoso J, Casoni E, Turon A, Mayugo J (2019) A phase field approach to simulate intralaminar and translaminar fracture in long fiber composite materials. Compos Struct 220:899–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Reinoso J, Catalanotti G, Blázquez A, Areias P, Camanho P, París F (2017a) A consistent anisotropic damage model for laminated fiber-reinforced composites using the 3d-version of the puck failure criterion. Int J Solids Struct 126–127:37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Reinoso J, Paggi M, Linder C (2017b) Phase field modeling of brittle fracture for enhanced assumed strain shells at large deformations: formulation and finite element implementation. Comput Mech 59:981–1001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rizzi G, Dal Corso F, Veber D, Bigoni D (2019a) Identification of second-gradient elastic materials from planar hexagonal lattices. Part I: analytical derivation of equivalent constitutive tensors. Int J Solids Struct 176–177:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rizzi G, Dal Corso F, Veber D, Bigoni D (2019b) Identification of second-gradient elastic materials from planar hexagonal lattices. Part II: Mechanical characteristics and model validation. Int J Solids Struct 176–177:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Salvadori A, Fantoni F (2016) Fracture propagation in brittle materials as a standard dissipative process: general theorems and crack tracking algorithms. J Mech Phys Solids 95:681–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Salvadori A, Wawrzynek P, Fantoni F (2019) Fracture propagation in brittle materials as a standard dissipative process: effective crack tracking algorithms based on a viscous regularization. J Mech Phys Solids 127:221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sargado JM, Keilegavlen E, Berre I, Nordbotten JM (2018) High-accuracy phase-field models for brittle fracture based on a new family of degradation functions. J Mech Phys Solids 111:458–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sevostianov I, Giraud A (2013) Generalization of maxwell homogenization scheme for elastic material containing inhomogeneities of diverse shape. Int J Eng Sci 64:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sevostianov I, Yilmaz N, Kushch V, Levin V (2005) Effective elastic properties of matrix composites with transversely-isotropic phases. Int J Solids Struct 42(2):455–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Smyshlyaev V (2009) Propagation and localization of elastic waves in highly anisotropic periodic composites via two-scale homogenization. Mech Mater R59:434–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Smyshlyaev V, Cherednichenko K (2000) On rigorous derivation of strain gradient effects in the overall behaviour of periodic heterogeneous media. J Mech Phys Solids 48(6):1325–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tanné E, Li T, Bourdin B, Marigo J-J, Maurini C (2018) Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 110:80–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Teichtmeister S, Kienle D, Aldakheel F, Keip M (2017) Phase field modeling of fracture in anisotropic brittle solids. Int J Non Linear Mech 97:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tran T, Monchiet V, Bonnet G (2012) A micromechanics-based approach for the derivation of constitutive elastic coefficients of strain-gradient media. Int J Solids Struct 49(5):783–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Trovalusci P, Ostoja-Starzewski M, De Bellis ML, Murrali A (2015) Scale-dependent homogenization of random composites as micropolar continua. Eur J Mech A 49:396–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Turon A, González E, Sarrado C, Guillamet G, Maimí P (2018) Accurate simulation of delamination under mixed-mode loading using a cohesive model with a mode-dependent penalty stiffness. Compos Struct 184:506–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Verhoosel CV, de Borst R (2013) A phase-field model for cohesive fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 96(1):43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Willis JR (1981) Variational and related methods for the overall properties of composites. In: Advances in applied mechanics, vol 21. Elsevier, pp 1–78Google Scholar
  98. Wu JY (2017) A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure. J Mech Phys Solids 103:72–99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yuan X, Tomita Y, Andou T (2008) A micromechanical approach of nonlocal modeling for media with periodic microstructures. Mech Res Commun 35(1–2):126–133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zienkiewicz O, Taylor R (1977) The finite element method. McGraw-hill, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Fantoni
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Bacigalupo
    • 2
  • M. Paggi
    • 2
  • J. Reinoso
    • 3
  1. 1.DICATAM, Universitá degli Studi di BresciaBresciaItaly
  2. 2.IMT School for Advanced Studies LuccaLuccaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Continuum Mechanics and Structural Mechanics, School of EngineeringUniversidad de SevillaSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations