Advertisement

International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 167, Issue 2, pp 221–234 | Cite as

Fracture toughness of bulk adhesives in mode I and mode III and curing effect

  • Z. Chen
  • R. D. Adams
  • Lucas F. M. da Silva
Original Paper

Abstract

Failure load predictions of adhesively bonded lap joints are either done based on a stress/strain limit criterion or using concepts of fracture mechanics. For the former case, the stress-strain curves of the adhesive must be determined accurately and for the latter case the toughness of the adhesive is needed. The present study gives for two adhesives, one brittle and one ductile, the strength and fracture properties in the bulk form. Stress-strain curves are given in tension and shear. The toughness was measured in mode I using a three point bending specimen and in mode III with a circular specimen with a notch under torsion. Mixed-mode criteria are discussed and it is shown that the experimental results are in good agreement with the strain energy theory. Finally, the effect of shrinkage stresses on the fracture toughness was studied and it is shown that they have a substantial effect on the fracture toughness.

Keywords

Epoxy Tensile and shear properties Fracture toughness Mode I Mode III Effect of cure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams RD, Comyn J, Wake WC (1997) Structural adhesive joints in engineering. 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams RD, Coppendale J, Mallick V, Al-Hamdam H (1992) The effect of temperature on the strength of adhesive joints. Int J Adh Adh 12: 185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banea MD, da Silva LFM (2009) Mechanical characterization of flexible adhesives. J Adh 85: 261–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chai H (1995) Deformation and fracture of particulate epoxy in adhesive bonds. Acta Metallur Mater 43: 163–172Google Scholar
  5. Chai H (1988) Shear fracture. Int J Fract 37: 137–159Google Scholar
  6. Chen Z, Adams RD, da Silva LFM (2010) Mechanics of materials. submittedGoogle Scholar
  7. da Silva LFM, Adams RD (2005) Measurement of the mechanical properties of structural adhesives in tension and shear over a wide range of temperatures. J Adh Sci Technol 19: 109–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. da Silva LFM, Critchlow GW, Figueiredo MAV (2008) Parametric study of adhesively bonded single lap joints by the Taguchi method. J Adh Sci Technol 22: 1477–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Moura MFSF (2008) Progressive damage modelling. In: da Silva LFM, Öchsner A (eds) Modeling of adhesively bonded joints. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 155–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dillard DA, Singh HK, Pohlit DJ, Starbuck MJ (2009) Observations on decreased fracture toughness for mixed mode fracture testing of adhesively bonded joints. J Adh Sci Technol 23: 1515–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duan K, Hu X, Mai Y-W (2004) Substrate constraint and adhesive thickness effects on fracture toughness of adhesive joints. J Adh Sci Technol 18: 39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erdogan F, Sih GC (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Basic Eng Trans ASME 85: 519–527Google Scholar
  13. Ewalds HL, Wanhill RJH (1985) Fracture mechanics. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant LDR, Adams RD, da Silva LFM (2009) Experimental and numerical analysis of single lap joints for the automotive industry. Int J Adh Adh 29: 405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Groth HL (1985) A method to predict fracture in an adhesively bonded joint. Int J Adh Adh 5: 19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hussein MA, Pu SL, Underwood J (1974) Strain energy release rate for a crack under combined mode I and mode II, ASTM STP 560Google Scholar
  17. Jeandrau JP (1991) Analysis and design data for adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adh Adh 11: 71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kinloch AJ (1987) Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ (1981) The fracture resistance of a toughened epoxy adhesive. J Adh 12: 59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knauss WG (1970) An observation of crack propagation in anti-plane shear. Int J Fract Mech 6: 183–187Google Scholar
  21. Liu Z, Gibson RF, Newaz GM (2002) Improved closed form analytical models for the mixed mode bending test of adhesively bonded joints. J Adh 78: 245–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Madhusudhana KS, Narasimhan R (2002) Experimental and numerical investigations of mixed mode crack growth resistance of a ductile adhesive joint. Eng Fract Mech 69: 865–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nadai A (1931) Plasticity: a mechanics of plastic state of matter. MacGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Needleman A (1987) A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J Appl Mech 54: 525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pang HLJ (1995) Mixed mode fracture analysis and toughness of adhesive joints. Eng Fract Mech 51: 575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rooke, DO, Cartwright, DJ (eds) (1976) Compendium of stress intensity factors. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Sih GC (1973) A special theory of crack propagation. In: Sih GC (eds) Mechanics of fracture I. Noordhoff International, Leyden, pp 21–45Google Scholar
  28. Tong L, Luo Q. (2008) Analysis of cracked lap shear (CLS) joints. In: da Silva LFM, Öchsner A (eds) Modeling of adhesively bonded joints. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 25–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1992) The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40: 1377–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ungsuwarungsri T, Knauss WG (1987) The role of damage-softened material behavior in the fracture of composites and adhesives. Int J Fract 35: 221–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang SS, Mandell JF, McGarry FJ (1978) An analysis of the crack tip stress field in DCB adhesive fracture specimens. Int J Fract 14: 39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yan C, Mai Y-W, Ye L (2001) Effect of bond thickness on fracture behaviour in adhesive joints. J Adh 75: 27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Chen
    • 1
  • R. D. Adams
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lucas F. M. da Silva
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Faculdade de EngenhariaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations