A multi-stage return algorithm for solving the classical damage component of constitutive models for rocks, ceramics, and other rock-like media
- 245 Downloads
Classical plasticity and damage models for porous quasi-brittle media usually suffer from mathematical defects such as non-convergence and non-uniqueness. Yield or damage functions for porous quasi-brittle media often have yield functions with contours so distorted that following those contours to the yield surface in a return algorithm can take the solution to a false elastic domain. A steepest-descent return algorithm must include iterative corrections; otherwise, the solution is non-unique because contours of any yield function are non-unique. A multi-stage algorithm has been developed to address both spurious convergence and non-uniqueness, as well as to improve efficiency. The region of pathological isosurfaces is masked by first returning the stress state to the Drucker–Prager surface circumscribing the actual yield surface. From there, steepest-descent is used to locate a point on the yield surface. This first-stage solution, which is extremely efficient because it is applied in a 2D subspace, is generally not the correct solution, but it is used to estimate the correct return direction. The first-stage solution is projected onto the estimated correct return direction in 6D stress space. Third invariant dependence and anisotropy are accommodated in this second-stage correction. The projection operation introduces errors associated with yield surface curvature, so the two-stage iteration is applied repeatedly to converge. Regions of extremely high curvature are detected and handled separately using an approximation to vertex theory. The multi-stage return is applied holding internal variables constant to produce a non-hardening solution. To account for hardening from pore collapse (or softening from damage), geometrical arguments are used to clearly illustrate the appropriate scaling of the non-hardening solution needed to obtain the hardening (or softening) solution.
KeywordsPlasticity Return algorithms Rock-like media Pathologies of yield functions Damage Uniqueness
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- ASME V&V 10-2006 (2006) Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. The american Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Brannon RM (2007) Elements of phenomenological plasticity: geometrical insight, computational algorithms, and topics in shock physics. Shock Wave Science and Technology Reference Library, vol. 2, chap. 6. Springer, Berlin, pp 225–274Google Scholar
- Fossum AF, Brannon RM (2004) The SANDIA GEOMODEL theory and user’s guide. Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND2004-3226, Albuquerque (unlimited release edn)Google Scholar
- Krieg RD, Krieg DB (1977) Accuracies of numerical solution methods for the elastic-perfectly plastic model. J Press Vessel Technol 99: 510–515Google Scholar
- Roache PJ (1998) Verification and validation in computational science and engineering. Hermosa Publishers, AlbuquerqueGoogle Scholar