Advertisement

Formal Methods in System Design

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 191–232 | Cite as

A compositional modelling and analysis framework for stochastic hybrid systems

  • Ernst Moritz Hahn
  • Arnd Hartmanns
  • Holger Hermanns
  • Joost-Pieter Katoen
Article

Abstract

The theory of hybrid systems is well-established as a model for real-world systems consisting of continuous behaviour and discrete control. In practice, the behaviour of such systems is also subject to uncertainties, such as measurement errors, or is controlled by randomised algorithms. These aspects can be modelled and analysed using stochastic hybrid systems. In this paper, we present HModest, an extension to the Modest modelling language—which is originally designed for stochastic timed systems without complex continuous aspects—that adds differential equations and inclusions as an expressive way to describe the continuous system evolution. Modest is a high-level language inspired by classical process algebras, thus compositional modelling is an integral feature. We define the syntax and semantics of HModest and show that it is a conservative extension of Modest that retains the compositional modelling approach. To allow the analysis of HModest models, we report on the implementation of a connection to recently developed tools for the safety verification of stochastic hybrid systems, and illustrate the language and the tool support with a set of small, but instructive case studies.

Keywords

Stochastic hybrid automata Process calculus Modelling Analysis Abstraction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Pedro D’Argenio for discussions on the language design and Nicolás Wolovick (both from University of Cordoba, Argentina) for his support in the development of the concrete semantics.

References

  1. 1.
    Abate A, Katoen J, Lygeros J, Prandini M (2010) Approximate model checking of stochastic hybrid systems. Eur J Control 16(6):624–641 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abate A, Prandini M, Lygeros J, Sastry S (2008) Probabilistic reachability and safety for controlled discrete time stochastic hybrid systems. Automatica 44(11):2724–2734 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altman E, Gaitsgory V (1997) Asymptotic optimization of a nonlinear hybrid system governed by a Markov decision process. SIAM J Control Optim 35(6):2070–2085 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alur R, Courcoubetis C, Halbwachs N, Henzinger TA, Ho PH, Nicollin X, Olivero A, Sifakis J, Yovine S (1995) The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems. Theor Comput Sci 138:3–34 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alur R, Dang T, Esposito JM, Hur Y, Ivancic F, Kumar V, Lee I, Mishra P, Pappas GJ, Sokolsky O (2003) Hierarchical modeling and analysis of embedded systems. Proc IEEE 91(1):11–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alur R, Dang T, Ivancic F (2006) Predicate abstraction for reachability analysis of hybrid systems. ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst 5(1):152–199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alur R, Dill DL (1994) A theory of timed automata. Theor Comput Sci 126(2):183–235 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baró Graf H, Hermanns H, Kulshrestha J, Peter J, Vahldiek A, Vasudevan A (2011) A verified wireless safety critical hard real-time design. In: IEEE int symp on a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks (WoWMoM). IEEE Press, New York Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Beek DA, Man KL, Reniers MA, Rooda JE, Schiffelers RRH (2006) Syntax and consistent equation semantics of hybrid Chi. J Log Algebr Program 68(1–2):129–210 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Behrmann G, David A, Larsen KG (2004) A tutorial on uppaal. In: Formal methods for the design of real-time systems (SFM-RT). LNCS, vol 3185. Springer, Berlin, pp 200–236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berendsen J, Jansen DN, Katoen JP (2006) Probably on time and within budget: on reachability in priced probabilistic timed automata. In: Quantitative evaluation of systems (QEST). IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, pp 311–322 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernadsky M, Sharykin R, Alur R (2004) Structured modeling of concurrent stochastic hybrid systems. In: Formal modelling and analysis of timed systems, and formal techniques in real-time and fault-tolerant systems (FORMATS/FTRTFT). LNCS, vol 3253. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berrang P, Bogdoll J, Hahn EM, Hartmanns A, Hermanns H (2012) Dependability results for power grids with decentralized stabilization strategies. Reports of SFB/TR 14 AVACS 83, SFB/TR 14 AVACS, ISSN: 1860-9821. www.avacs.org
  14. 14.
    Blom H, Lygeros J (2006) Stochastic hybrid systems: theory and safety critical applications. Lecture notes in control and information sciences, vol 337. Springer, Berlin CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bogdoll J, David A, Hartmanns A, Hermanns H (2012) mctau: bridging the gap between Modest and UPPAAL. In: Model checking software—19th international workshop, SPIN 2012, Oxford, UK, July 23–24. LNCS, vol 7385. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-642-31758-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bogdoll J, Fioriti LMF, Hartmanns A, Hermanns H (2011) Partial order methods for statistical model checking and simulation. In: Formal techniques for distributed systems (FMOODS/FORTE). LNCS, vol 6722. Springer, Berlin, pp 59–74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bohnenkamp HC, D’Argenio PR, Hermanns H, Katoen JP (2006) MoDeST: a compositional modeling formalism for hard and softly timed systems. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 32(10):812–830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bohnenkamp HC, Gorter J, Guidi J, Katoen JP (2005) Are you still there?—A lightweight algorithm to monitor node presence in self-configuring networks. In: Dependable systems and networks (DSN). IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, pp 704–709 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brinksma E, Krilavicius T, Usenko YS (2005) A process-algebraic approach to hybrid systems. In: 16th IFAC world congress. IFAC, Laxenburg Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bujorianu ML (2004) Extended stochastic hybrid systems and their reachability problem. In: Hybrid systems: computation and control (HSCC). LNCS, vol 2993. Springer, Berlin, pp 234–249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bujorianu ML, Lygeros J, Bujorianu MC (2005) Bisimulation for general stochastic hybrid systems. In: Hybrid systems: computation and control (HSCC). LNCS, vol 3414. Springer, Berlin, pp 198–214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clarke E, Fehnker A, Han Z, Krogh B, Stursberg O, Theobald M (2003) Verification of hybrid systems based on counterexample-guided abstraction refinement. In: Tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems (TACAS). LNCS, vol 2619. Springer, Berlin, pp 192–207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cuijpers PJL, Reniers MA (2005) Hybrid process algebra. J Log Algebr Program 62(2):191–245 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dang T, Maler O (1998) Reachability analysis via face lifting. In: Hybrid systems: computation and control (HSCC). LNCS, vol 1386. Springer, Berlin, pp 96–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D’Argenio PR, Wolovick N, Terraf PS, Celayes P (2009) Nondeterministic labeled Markov processes: bisimulations and logical characterization. In: Quantitative evaluation of systems (QEST). IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, pp 11–20 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis MHA (1993) Markov models and optimization. Chapman & Hall, London CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Desharnais J, Edalat A, Panangaden P (2002) Bisimulation for labelled Markov processes. Inf Comput 179(2):163–193 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Edwards S, Lavagno L, Lee EA, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A (1997) Design of embedded systems: formal models, validation, and synthesis. Proc IEEE 85(3):366–390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fränzle M, Hahn EM, Hermanns H, Wolovick N, Zhang L (2011) Measurability and safety verification for stochastic hybrid systems. In: Hybrid systems: computation and control (HSCC). ACM, New York, pp 43–52 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fränzle M, Herde C, Teige T, Ratschan S, Schubert T (2007) Efficient solving of large non-linear arithmetic constraint systems with complex boolean structure. J. Satisf. Boolean Model. Comput. 1(3–4):209–236 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Frehse G (2008) Phaver: algorithmic verification of hybrid systems past HyTech. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf 10(3):263–279 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frehse G, Guernic CL, Donzé A, Cotton S, Ray R, Lebeltel O, Ripado R, Girard A, Dang T, Maler O (2011) Spaceex: scalable verification of hybrid systems. In: Computer-aided verification (CAV). LNCS, vol 6806. Springer, Berlin, pp 379–395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Giry M (1982) A categorical approach to probability theory. In: Categorical aspects of topology and analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 68–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Groß C, Hermanns H, Pulungan R (2007) Does clock precision influence Zigbee’s energy consumptions? In: Principles of distributed systems (OPODIS). LNCS, vol 4878. Springer, Berlin, pp 174–188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grosu R, Stauner T (2002) Modular and visual specification of hybrid systems: an introduction to HyCharts. Form Methods Syst Des 21(1):5–38 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hartmanns A (2010) Model-checking and simulation for stochastic timed systems. In: FMCO. LNCS, vol 6957. Springer, Berlin, pp 372–391 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hartmanns A, Hermanns H (2009) A Modest approach to checking probabilistic timed automata. In: Quantitative evaluation of systems (QEST). IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, pp 187–196 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Henzinger TA (1996) The theory of hybrid automata. In: IEEE symp on logic in computer science (LICS), pp 278–292 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Henzinger TA, Ho PH, Wong-Toi H (1997) HYTECH: a model checker for hybrid systems. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf 1(1–2):110–122 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Herde C, Eggers A, Fränzle M, Teige T (2008) Analysis of hybrid systems using HySAT. In: International conference on systems (ICONS). IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, pp 196–201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hermanns H, Herzog U, Katoen JP (2002) Process algebra for performance evaluation. Theor Comput Sci 274(1–2):43–87 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hillston J (1994) A compositional approach to performance modelling. PhD thesis, Univ of Edinburgh Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hu J, Lygeros J, Sastry S (2000) Towards a theory of stochastic hybrid systems. In: Hybrid systems: computation and control (HSCC). LNCS, vol 1790. Springer, Berlin, pp 160–173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kwiatkowska M, Norman G, Parker D (2011) PRISM 4.0: verification of probabilistic real-time systems. In: Computer aided verification (CAV’11). LNCS, vol 6806. Springer, Berlin, pp 585–591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kwiatkowska M, Norman G, Segala R, Sproston J (2000) Verifying quantitative properties of continuous probabilistic timed automata. In: Concurrency theory (CONCUR’00). LNCS, vol 1877. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–137 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kwiatkowska MZ, Norman G, Segala R, Sproston J (2002) Automatic verification of real-time systems with discrete probability distributions. Theor Comput Sci 282(1):101–150 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lee EA (2002) Embedded software. In: Zelkowitz M (ed) Advances in computers, vol 56. Academic Press, San Diego Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Legay A, Delahaye B, Bensalem S (2010) Statistical model checking: an overview. In: Runtime verification (RV). LNCS, vol 6418. Springer, Berlin, pp 122–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lynch NA, Segala R, Vaandrager FW (2003) Hybrid i/o automata. Inf Comput 185(1):105–157 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mader A, Bohnenkamp HC, Usenko YS, Jansen DN, Hurink J, Hermanns H (2010) Synthesis and stochastic assessment of cost-optimal schedules. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf 12(5):305–318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Meseguer J, Sharykin R (2006) Specification and analysis of distributed object-based stochastic hybrid systems. In: Hybrid systems: computation and control (HSCC). LNCS, vol 3927. Springer, Berlin, pp 460–475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Panangaden P (2008) Labelled Markov processes. World Scientific, Singapore Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Penna GD, Intrigila B, Melatti I, Tronci E, Zilli MV (2006) Finite horizon analysis of Markov chains with the Murphy verifier. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf 8(4–5):397–409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Platzer A (2011) Stochastic differential dynamic logic for stochastic hybrid programs. In: Bjørner N, Sofronie-Stokkermans V (eds) CADE. LNCS, vol 6803. Springer, Berlin, pp 446–460 Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Preußig J, Kowalewski S, Wong-Toi H, Henzinger T (1998) An algorithm for the approximative analysis of rectangular automata. In: Formal techniques in fault tolerant and real time systems (FTRTFT). LNCS, vol 1486. Springer, Berlin, pp 228–240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ratschan S, She Z (2007) Safety verification of hybrid systems by constraint propagation-based abstraction refinement. ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst 6(1):8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Segala R (1995) Modelling and verification of randomized distributed real-time systems. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Segala R, Lynch NA (1995) Probabilistic simulations for probabilistic processes. Nord J Comput 2(2):250–273 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sproston J (2000) Decidable model checking of probabilistic hybrid automata. In: Formal techniques in real-time and fault-tolerant systems (FTRTFT). LNCS, vol 1926. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Strubbe S, van der Schaft A (2006) Compositional modelling of stochastic hybrid systems. In: Cassandras CG, Lygeros J (eds) Stochastic hybrid systems. Control engineering series. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 47–77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wolovick N (2012) Continuous probability and nondeterminism in labeled transition systems. PhD thesis, FaMAF, UNC, Córdoba, Argentina Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yue H, Bohnenkamp HC, Kampschulte M, Katoen JP (2011) Analysing and improving energy efficiency of distributed slotted aloha. In: Smart spaces and next generation wired/wireless networking (NEW2AN). LNCS, vol 6869. Springer, Berlin, pp 197–208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zhang L, She Z, Ratschan S, Hermanns H, Hahn E (2010) Safety verification for probabilistic hybrid systems. In: Computer aided verification. LNCS, vol 6174. Springer, Berlin, pp 196–211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernst Moritz Hahn
    • 1
  • Arnd Hartmanns
    • 1
  • Holger Hermanns
    • 1
  • Joost-Pieter Katoen
    • 2
  1. 1.Saarland University – Computer ScienceSaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.LS2: Software Modelling and VerificationRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations