Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 96–106 | Cite as

The Notion of Locality in Relational Quantum Mechanics

  • P. Martin-DussaudEmail author
  • C. Rovelli
  • F. Zalamea
Article

Abstract

The term ‘locality’ is used in different contexts with different meanings. There have been claims that relational quantum mechanics is local, but it is not clear then how it accounts for the effects that go under the usual name of quantum non-locality. The present article shows that the failure of ‘locality’ in the sense of Bell, once interpreted in the relational framework, reduces to the existence of a common cause in an indeterministic context. In particular, there is no need to appeal to a mysterious space-like influence to understand it.

Keywords

Non-locality Locality Relational quantum mechanics EPR pairs Local causality Bell’s theorem 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The ideas presented in this paper emerged during the Rethinking Workshop 2018 organised with the support of the Basic Research Community for Physics (BRCP). We thank especially Flavio Del Santo, Johannes Kleiner and Robin Lorenz for useful discussions. Daniel Martinez is also thanked for proofreading. We acknowledge the OCEVU Labex (ANR-11-LABX-0060) and the A*MIDEX Project (ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02) funded by the ‘Investissements d’Avenir’ French government program managed by the ANR.

References

  1. 1.
    Bell, J.S.: The theory of local beables. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, pp. 52–62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stapp, H .P.: Bell’s theorem and world process. Nuo. Cim. B Ser. 11 29(2), 270–276 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rovelli, C.: Relational quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theoret. Phys. 35(8), 1637–1678 (1996). arXiv:quant-ph/9609002 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smerlak, M., Rovelli, C.: Relational EPR. Found. Phys. 37(3), 427–445 (2007). arXiv:quant-ph/0604064
  5. 5.
    Laudisa, F.: Open problems in relational quantum mechanics. arXiv:1710.07556
  6. 6.
    Earman, J.: Aspects of determinism in modern physics. In: Butterfield, J., Earman, J. (eds.) Philosophy of Physics, pp. 1369–1434. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bell, J.S.: Beables for quantum field theory. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, pp. 173–180. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aspect, A., Grangier, P., Roger, G.: Experimental realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Gedanken experiment: a new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91–94 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I. Phys. Rev. 85(2), 166–179 (1952)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. II. Phys. Rev. 85(2), 180–193 (1952)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldstein, S., Zanghí, N.: Reality and the Role of the Wavefunction in Quantum Theory, In: The Wave Function, Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics, A. Ney and D. Z. Albert, eds., ch. 4, pp. 91–109. Oxford University Press (2013) arXiv:1101.4575
  13. 13.
    Rovelli, C.: Space is blue and birds fly through it. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 376 (2123) (2018) arXiv:1712.02894
  14. 14.
    Kochen, S., Specker, E., van Suijlekom, W.D.: The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 17, 59–87 (1968)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Candiotto, L.: The reality of relations. Giorn. Metafis. 2017(2), 537–551 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arntzenius, F.: Reichenbach’s common cause principle, In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, fall 2010 (2010) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physics-Rpcc/
  17. 17.
    van Fraassen, B.C.: The Scientific Image, 1987th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hofer-Szabó, G., Rédei, M., Szabó, L.: The Principle of the Common Cause. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bell, J.S.: La nouvelle cuisine. In: Sarlemijn, A., Kroes, P. (eds.) Between Science and Technology, pp. 97–115. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dorato, M.: Rovelli’ s relational quantum mechanics, anti-monism and quantum becoming (Chap. 14). In: Marmodoro, A., Yates, D. (eds.) The Metaphysics of Relations, pp. 235–261. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016). arXiv:1309.0132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Höhn, P .A., Wever, C .S .P.: Quantum theory from questions. Phys. Rev. A 95(1), 012102 (2017)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPTMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Basic Research Community for PhysicsLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.EFREI ParisParisFrance

Personalised recommendations