Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 47, Issue 12, pp 1597–1608 | Cite as

The Pauli Objection

  • Juan Leon
  • Lorenzo MacconeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Schrödinger’s equation says that the Hamiltonian is the generator of time translations. This seems to imply that any reasonable definition of time operator must be conjugate to the Hamiltonian. Then both time and energy must have the same spectrum since conjugate operators are unitarily equivalent. Clearly this is not always true: normal Hamiltonians have lower bounded spectrum and often only have discrete eigenvalues, whereas we typically desire that time can take any real value. Pauli concluded that constructing a general a time operator is impossible (although clearly it can be done in specific cases). Here we show how the Pauli argument fails when one uses an external system (a “clock”) to track time, so that time arises as correlations between the system and the clock (conditional probability amplitudes framework). In this case, the time operator is conjugate to the clock Hamiltonian and not to the system Hamiltonian, but its eigenvalues still satisfy the Schrödinger equation for arbitrary system Hamiltonians.

Keywords

Time Quantum mechanics Foundations of quantum mechanics Time operator 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the FQXi foundation for financial support in the “Physics of what happens” program. JL acknowledges support from MINECO/FEDER Project FIS2015-70856-P and CAM PRICYT Project QUITEMAD+ S2013/ICE-2801 and Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano for the kind hospitality at Pavia University. LM acknowledges very useful feedback from Vittorio Giovannetti and Seth Lloyd.

References

  1. 1.
    Kuchar̆, K.V.: Time and interpretations of quantum gravity. In: Kunstatter, G., Vincent, D., Williams, J. (eds.) Proc. 4th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, pp. 69–76. World Scientific, Singapore (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, E.: The problem of time in quantum gravity. In: Frignanni, V.R. (ed.) Classical and Quantum Gravity: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Nova, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuchar̆, K.V.: In: Isham, C.J., Penrose, R., Sciama, D.W. (eds.) Quantum Gravity 2: A Second Oxford Symposium. Clarendon, Oxford (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuchar̆, K.V.: In: Ashtekar, A., Stachel, J. (eds.) Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity. Birkhäuser, Boston (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Isham, C.J.: In: Ibort, L.A., Rodríguez, M.A. (eds.) Integrable Systems, Quantum Groups and Quantum Field Theories. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuchar̆, K.V.: In: Butterfield, J. (ed.) The Arguments of Time. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aharonov, Y., Oppenheim, J., Popescu, S., Reznik, B., Unruh, W.G.: Measurement of time of arrival in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 57, 4130 (1998)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Werner, R.: Arrival time observables in quantum mechanics. Annales de l’I. H. P. 47, 429 (1987)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mielnik, B.: The screen problem. Found. Phys. 24, 1113 (1994)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Delgado, V., Muga, J.G.: Arrival time in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 56, 3425 (1997)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galapon, E.A., Villanueva, A.: Quantum first time-of-arrival operators. J. Phys. A 41, 455302 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leon, J.: Time-of-arrival formalism for the relativistic particle. J. Phys. A 30, 479 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newton, T.D., Wigner, E.P.: Localized states for elementary systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 400 (1949)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brunetti, R., Fredenhagen, K., Hoge, M.: Time in quantum physics: from an external parameter to an intrinsic observable. Found. Phys. 40, 1368 (2010)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brunetti, R., Fredenhagen, K.: Time of occurrence observable in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 66, 044101 (2002)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olkhovsky, V.S., Recami, E.: Time as a quantum observable. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 22, 5063 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olkhovsky, V.S.: Time as a quantum observable, canonically conjugated to energy, and foundations of self-consistent time analysis of quantum processes. Adv. Math. Phys. 2009, 859710 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Downes, T.G., Milburn, G.J., Caves, C.M.: Optimal Quantum Estimation for Gravitation, arXiv:1108.5220 (2011)
  19. 19.
    Stueckelberg, E.C.G.: La signification du temps propre en mécanique ondulatoire. Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 322 (1941)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stueckelberg, E.C.G.: La mécanique du point matériel en théorie des quanta. Helv. Phys. Acta 15, 23 (1942)ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fanchi, J.R.: Review of invariant time formulations of relativistic quantum theories. Found. Phys. 41, 4 (2011)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aharonov, Y., Popescu, S., Tollaksen, J.: Each instant of time a new Universe. In: Quantum Theory: A Two-Time Success Story (Springer, 2014) pp. 21–36, arXiv:1305.1615 (2013)
  23. 23.
    Farhi, E., Gutmann, S.: The functional integral constructed directly from the Hamiltonian. Ann. Phys. 213, 182 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cotler, J., Wilczek, F.: Entangled histories. Phys. Scripta T168, 014004 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peres, A.: Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pauli, W.: General Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Braunstein, S.L., Caves, C.M., Milburn, G.J.: Generalized uncertainty relations: theory, examples, and lorentz invariance. Ann. Phys. 247, 135 (1996)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., Maccone, L.: Quantum limits to dynamical evolution. Phys. Rev. A 67, 052109 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Holevo, A.S.: Quantum Systems, Channels, Information (de Gruyter Studies in Mathematical Physics)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Holevo, A.S.: Estimation of shift parameters of a quantum state. Rep. Math. Phys. 13, 379 (1978)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Greenberger, D.M.: Conceptual Problems Related to Time and Mass in Quantum Theory, arXiv:1011.3709 (2010)
  32. 32.
    Salecker, H., Wigner, E.P.: Quantum limitations of the measurement of space–time distances. Phys. Rev. 109, 571 (1958)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peres, A.: Measurement of time by quantum clocks. Am. J. Phys. 48, 552 (1980)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Page, D.N., Wootters, W.K.: Evolution without evolution: dynamics described by stationary observables. Phys. Rev. D 27, 2885 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Page, D.N.: Clock time and entropy. In: Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, eds. J.J. Halliwell, et al., (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9303020
  36. 36.
    Wootters, W.K.: ‘Time’ replaced by quantum correlations. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 23, 701 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aharonov, Y., Kaufherr, T.: Quantum frames of reference. Phys. Rev. D 30, 368 (1984)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., Maccone, L.: Quantum time. Phys. Rev. D 92, 045033 (2015)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McCord Morse, P., Feshbach, H.: Methods of Theoretical Physics, Part I. McGraw-Hill, New York (1953)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zeh, H.D.: Emergence of classical time from a universal wavefunction. Phys. Lett. A 116, 9 (1986)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zeh, H.D.: Time in quantum theory, http://www.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de/~as3/TimeInQT.pdf
  42. 42.
    Vedral, V.: Time, (Inverse) Temperature and Cosmological Inflation as Entanglement, arXiv:1408.6965 (2014)
  43. 43.
    Banks, T.: TCP, quantum gravity, the cosmological constant and all that. Nucl. Phys. B 249, 332 (1985)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brout, R.: On the concept of time and the origin of the cosmological temperature. Found. Phys. 17, 603 (1987)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brout, R., Horwitz, G., Weil, D.: On the onset of time and temperature in cosmology. Phys. Lett. B 192, 318 (1987)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brout, R.: Time and temperature in semi-classical gravity. Z. Phys. B 68, 339 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rovelli, C.: Relational quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 1637 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rovelli, C.: Time in quantum gravity: an hypothesis. Phys. Rev. D 43, 442 (1991)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rovelli, C.: Quantum Gravity (2003), obtainable from http://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/~rovelli/book.pdf
  50. 50.
    Gambini, R., Porto, R.A., Pullin, J., Torterolo, S.: Conditional probabilities with Dirac observables and the problem of time in quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 79, 041501(R) (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gambini, R., Garcia-Pintos, L.P., Pullin, J.: An axiomatic formulation of the Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 42, 256 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gambini, R., Pullin, J.: The Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics: frequently asked questions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 174, 012003 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Moreva, E., Brida, G., Gramegna, M., Giovannetti, V., Maccone, L., Genovese, M.: Time from quantum entanglement: an experimental illustration. Phys. Rev. A 89, 052122 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hilgevoord, J.: Time in quantum mechanics: a story of confusion. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 36, 29 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    DeWitt, B.S.: Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory. Phys. Rev. 160, 1113 (1967)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Peres, A.: Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993), Eq. (8.90)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Halvorson, H.: Does quantum theory kill time? http://www.princeton.edu/~hhalvors/papers/ (2010)
  58. 58.
    Hegerteldt, G.C., Ruijsenaars, S.N.M.: Remarks on causality, localization, and spreading of wave packets. Phys. Rev D 22, 377 (1980)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Busch, P., Grabowski, M., Lahti, P.J.: Time observables in quantum theory. Phys. Lett. A 191, 357 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Srinivas, M.D., Vijayalakshmi, R.: The ‘time of occurrence’ in quantum mechanics. Pramana 16, 173 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Dirac, P.A.M.: Relativity quantum mechanics with an application to Compton scattering. Proc. R. Soc. (London) A, 111, 405 (1926)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hislop, P.D., Sigal, I.M.: Introduction to Spectral Theory. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, Nwe York (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ballentine, L.E.: Quantum Mechanics, A Modern Development. World Scientific, Singapore (2014)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Borel, E.: Le Hasard. Alcan, Paris (1914)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mandelstam, L., Tamm, I.G.: The uncertainty relation between energy and time in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. J. Phys. USSR 9, 249 (1945)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bhattacharyya, K.: Quantum decay and the Mandelstam–Tamm-energy inequality. J. Phys. A 16, 2993 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSICMadridSpain
  2. 2.Dip. Fisica and INFN Sez. PaviaUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations