Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 389–405 | Cite as

Photon Flux and Distance from the Source: Consequences for Quantum Communication

  • Andrei Khrennikov
  • Börje Nilsson
  • Sven Nordebo
  • Igor Volovich
Article

Abstract

The paper explores the fundamental physical principles of quantum mechanics (in fact, quantum field theory) that limit the bit rate for long distances and examines the assumption used in this exploration that losses can be ignored. Propagation of photons in optical fibers is modelled using methods of quantum electrodynamics. We define the “photon duration” as the standard deviation of the photon arrival time; we find its asymptotics for long distances and then obtain the main result of the paper: the linear dependence of photon duration on the distance when losses can be ignored. This effect puts the limit to joint increasing of the photon flux and the distance from the source and it has consequences for quantum communication. Once quantum communication develops into a real technology (including essential decrease of losses in optical fibres), it would be appealing to engineers to increase both the photon flux and the distance. And here our “photon flux/distance effect” has to be taken into account. This effect also may set an additional constraint to the performance of a loophole free test of Bell’s type—to close jointly the detection and locality loopholes.

Keywords

Photon propagation Optical fibre Photon duration Linear dependence of photon duration on the distance Loophole free Bell test Photon flux/distance effect 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the following funding agencies: MPNS COST Action MP1006 (Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics), Austrian Academy of Science (visiting professor fellowship of A. Khrennikov at Vienna University and Atom Institute, 2013). The authors would like to thank both reviewers for valuable comments and advices which improved essentially clarity of the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Ursin, R., Tiefenbacher, F., Schmitt-Manderbach, T., Weier, H., Scheidl, T., Lindenthal, M., Blauensteiner, B., Jennewein, T., Perdigues, J., Trojek, P., Ömer, B., Fürst, M., Meyenburg, M., Rarity, J., Sodnik, Z., Barbieri, C., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A.: Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144 km. Nat. Phys. 3, 481 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1987)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., Roger, G.: Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analysers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, R., Zeilinger, A.: Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039–5043 (1998)ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23(15), 880–884 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giustina, M., Mech, Al, Ramelow, S., Wittmann, B., Kofler, J., Beyer, J., Lita, A., Calkins, B., Th- Gerrits, Woo Nam, S., Ursin, R., Zeilinger, A.: Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption. Nature 497, 227–230 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christensen, B.G., McCusker, K.T., Altepeter, J., Calkins, B., Gerrits, T., Lita, A., Miller, A., Shalm, L.K., Zhang, Y., Nam, S.W., Brunner, N., Lim, C.C.W., Gisin, N., Kwiat, P.G.: Detection-loophole-free test of quantum nonlocality, and applications. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 1304–1306 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Muynck, W.M.: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, an Empiricists Approach. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adenier, G., Khrennikov, A.: Is the fair sampling assumption supported by EPR experiments? J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40, 131–141 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hooft, G’t: G.: the free-will postulate in quantum mechanics. Her Russ Acad Sci 81, 907–911 (2011). ArXiv: quant-ph/0701097v1 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaeger, G.: Entanglement, Information, and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (The Frontiers Collection). Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Plotnitsky, A.: Epistemology and Probability: Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and the Nature of Quantum-Theoretical Thinking. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khrennikov, A.: Contextual Approach to Quantum Formalism. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Groessing, G.: EmerQuM 11: Emergent Quantum Mechanics 2011 (Heinz von Foerster Congress) J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (2012). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/361/1/011001
  15. 15.
    De Raedt, K., Keimpema, K., De Raedt, H., Michielsen, K., Miyashita, S.: A local realist model for correlations of the singlet state. Eur. Phys. J. B 53, 139–142 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khrennikov, AYu., Volovich, I.V.: Local realism, contextualism and loopholes in Bell‘s experiments. In: Khrennikov, AYu. (ed.) Foundations of Probability and Physics-2. Ser. Math. Model. 5, pp. 325–344. Växjö University Press, Växjö (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, Q., Takesue, H., Nam, S.W., Langrock, C., Xie, X., Baek, B., Fejer, M.M., Yamamoto, Y.: Distribution of time-energy entanglement over 100 km fibre using superconducting singlephoton detectors. Opt. Express 16, 5776 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lloyd, S., Shahriar, M.S., Shapiro, J.H., Hemmer, P.R.: Long distance, unconditional teleportation of atomic states via complete Bell state measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167903 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Landry, O., van Houwelingen, J.A.W., Beveratos, A., Zbinden, H., Gisin, N.: Quantum teleportation over the Swisscom telecommunication network. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24(2), 398–403 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hübel, H., Vanner, M.R., Lederer, T., Blauensteiner, B., Lorünser, T., Poppe, A., Zeilinger, A.: High-fidelity transmission of polarization encoded qubits from an entangled source over 100 km of fibre. Opt. Express 15, 7853 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marcikic, I., de Riedmatten, H., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H., Legre, M., Gisin, N.: Distribution of time-bin entangled qubits over 50 km of optical fibre. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180502 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Takesue, H.: Long-distance distribution of time-bin entanglement generated in a cooled fibre. Opt. Express 14, 3453 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Honjo, T., Takesue, H., Kamada, H., Nishida, Y., Tadanaga, O., Asobe, M., Inoue, K.: Long-distance distribution of time-bin entangled photon pairs over 100 km using frequency up-conversion detectors. Opt. Express 15, 13957 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miya, T., Ternuma, Y., Hosaka, T., Migashita, T.: Ultimate low-loss single-mode fibre at \(1.55\,{\mu }\)m. Electron. Lett. 15, 106 (1979)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Agrawal, G.P.: Fiber-Optic Communication Systems, 4th edn. Wiley, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matloob, Reza, Loudon, Rodney: Electromagnetic field quantization in absorbing dielectrics. ii. Phys. Rev. A 53, 4567–4582 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gruner, T., Welsch, D.-G.: Green-function approach to the radiation-field quantization for homogeneous and inhomogeneous Kramers–Kronig dielectrics. Phys. Rev. A 53, 1818–1829 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Christ, A., Laiho, K., Eckstein, A., Lauckner, T., Mosley, P., Silberhorn, C.: Spatial modes in waveguided parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 80(3), 033829 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ishiwatari, T., Khrennikov, A., Nilsson, B., Volovich, I.: Quantum field theory and distance effects for polarization correlations in waveguides. In: 3rd conf. mathematical modeling of wave phenomena/20th Nordic conference on radio science and communications, vol. 1106 of AIP conference proceeding, pp 276–285. American Inst. of Physics (2009).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khrennikov, A., Nilsson, B., Nordebo, S., Volovich, I.: Distance dependence of entangled photons in waveguides. In: Conference FPP6-Foundations of probability and physics-6, vol. 1424 of AIP conference proceeding, pp. 262–269. American Inst. of Physics, Melville (2012).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Khrennikov, A., Nilsson, B., Nordebo, S., Volovich, I.: Quantization of propagating modes in optical fibres. Phys. Scr. 85, 06505 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khrennikov, A., Nilsson, B., Nordebo, S., Volovich, I. On the quantization of the electromagnetic field of a layered dielectric waveguide. In: Conference QTRF6—Quantim theory: reconsideration of foundations-6, vol. 1508 of AIP conference proceedings, pp. 285–299. American Inst. of Physics, Melville (2012).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mandel, L., Wolf, E.: Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nordebo, S., Nilsson,B., Biro, T., Cinar, G., Gustafsson, M., Gustafsson, S., Karlsson, A., and Sjöberg, M.: Low-frequency dispersion characteristics of the multi-layered coaxial cable. J. Eng. Math. (2013) Accepted for publication.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nussenzveig, H.M.: Causality and Dispersion Relations. Academic Press, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huttner, B., Barnett, S.M.: Quantization of the electromagnetic field in dielectrics. Phys. Rev. A 46, 4306–4322 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Matloob, R., Loudon, R., Barnett, S.M., Jeffers, J.: Electromagnetic field quantization in absorbing dielectrics. Phys. Rev. A 52, 4823–4838 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matloob, R.: Electromagnetic field quantization in an absorbing medium. Phys. Rev. A 60, 50–55 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Matloob, R.: Electromagnetic field quantization in a linear isotropic dielectric. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052110 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Olver, F.: Asymptotics and Special Functions. A. K. Peters, Natick (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jones, D.S.: The Theory of Generalised Functions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrei Khrennikov
    • 1
  • Börje Nilsson
    • 1
  • Sven Nordebo
    • 2
  • Igor Volovich
    • 3
  1. 1.International Center for Mathematical Modeling in Physics, Engineering, Economics, and Cognitive Science, Department of MathematicsLinnæus UniversityVäxjöSweden
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Electrical EngineeringLinnæus UniversityVäxjöSweden
  3. 3.Steklov Mathematical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations