A Brief Remark on Energy Conditions and the Geroch-Jang Theorem
The status of the geodesic principle in General Relativity has been a topic of some interest in the recent literature on the foundations of spacetime theories. Part of this discussion has focused on the role that a certain energy condition plays in the proof of a theorem due to Bob Geroch and Pong-Soo Jang [“Motion of a Body in General Relativity.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 16(1) (1975)] that can be taken to make precise the claim that the geodesic principle is a theorem, rather than a postulate, of General Relativity. In this brief note, I show, by explicit counterexample, that not only is a weaker energy condition than the one Geroch and Jang state insufficient to prove the theorem, but in fact a condition still stronger than the one that they assume is necessary.
KeywordsInertial motion General relativity Geroch-Jang theorem Energy condition Geodesic principle
- 4.Malament, D.: A remark about the ‘Geodesic Principle’ in general relativity. In: A Festschrift for William Demopoulos (2010, to appear). Preprint available at http://www.lps.uci.edu/malament/papers/GeodesicLaw.pdf
- 5.Malament, D.B.: Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2011, forthcoming) Google Scholar
- 6.Sus, A.: On the explanation of inertia (2011, forthcoming) Google Scholar
- 7.Weatherall, J.O.: The motion of a body in Newtonian theories. J. Math. Phys. 52(3) (2011) Google Scholar
- 8.Weatherall, J.O.: On the status of the Geodesic Principle in Newtonian and relativistic physics (2011, unpublished). Available at http://www.jamesowenweatherall.com/publications/