Foundations of Physics

, Volume 40, Issue 9–10, pp 1333–1340 | Cite as

Von Neumann’s ‘No Hidden Variables’ Proof: A Re-Appraisal

  • Jeffrey BubEmail author


Since the analysis by John Bell in 1965, the consensus in the literature is that von Neumann’s ‘no hidden variables’ proof fails to exclude any significant class of hidden variables. Bell raised the question whether it could be shown that any hidden variable theory would have to be nonlocal, and in this sense ‘like Bohm’s theory.’ His seminal result provides a positive answer to the question. I argue that Bell’s analysis misconstrues von Neumann’s argument. What von Neumann proved was the impossibility of recovering the quantum probabilities from a hidden variable theory of dispersion free (deterministic) states in which the quantum observables are represented as the ‘beables’ of the theory, to use Bell’s term. That is, the quantum probabilities could not reflect the distribution of pre-measurement values of beables, but would have to be derived in some other way, e.g., as in Bohm’s theory, where the probabilities are an artefact of a dynamical process that is not in fact a measurement of any beable of the system.


Hidden variables von Neumann’s proof Foundations of quantum mechanics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bell, J.S.: On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966). Reprinted in Bell, J.S., Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987) zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bell, J.S.: Beables for quantum field theory. In: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, pp. 173–180. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables, I and II. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–193 (1952) CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gleason, A.N.: Measures on the closed sub-spaces of Hilbert spaces. J. Math. Mech. 6, 885–893 (1957) zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jauch, J.M., Piron, C.: Can hidden variables be excluded in quantum mechanics? Helv. Phys. Acta 36, 827–837 (1963) zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mermin, N.D.: Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803–815 (1993) CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    von Neumann, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1955) zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy Department and Institute for Physical Science and TechnologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations