Foundations of Physics

, Volume 39, Issue 8, pp 903–920 | Cite as

Bohmian Mechanics, the Quantum-Classical Correspondence and the Classical Limit: The Case of the Square Billiard

  • A. Matzkin


Square billiards are quantum systems complying with the dynamical quantum-classical correspondence. Hence an initially localized wavefunction launched along a classical periodic orbit evolves along that orbit, the spreading of the quantum amplitude being controlled by the spread of the corresponding classical statistical distribution. We investigate wavepacket dynamics and compute the corresponding de Broglie-Bohm trajectories in the quantum square billiard. We also determine the trajectories and statistical distribution dynamics for the equivalent classical billiard. Individual Bohmian trajectories follow the streamlines of the probability flow and are generically non-classical. This can also hold even for short times, when the wavepacket is still localized along a classical trajectory. This generic feature of Bohmian trajectories is expected to hold in the classical limit. We further argue that in this context decoherence cannot constitute a viable solution in order to recover classicality.


Quantum-classical correspondence Bohmian mechanics Classical limit Square billiard 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Holland, P.R.: The Quantum Theory of Motion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cushing, J.T.: The causal quantum theory program. In: Cushing, J.T., Fine, A., Goldstein, S. (eds.) Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 184, pp. 1–19. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J.: Unbroken quantum realism from microscopic to macroscopic levels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2511–2514 (1985) CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Home, D.: Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Physics: An Overview from Modern Perspectives. Plenum, London (1997) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Einstein, A.: Elementare Uberlegungen zur Interpretation der Grundlagen der Quanten-Mechanik. In: Scientific Papers Presented to Max Born, pp. 33–40. Hafner, New York (1953) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J.: The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Routledge, London (1993) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doncheski, M.A., Heppelmann, S., Robinett, R.W., Tussey, D.C.: Wave packet construction in two-dimensional quantum billiards: Blueprints for the square, equilateral triangle, and circular cases. Am. J. Phys. 71, 541 (2003) CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldstein, H.: Classical Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1980) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kleinert, H.: Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets. World Scientific, Singapore (2006) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schulman, L.S.: Techniques and Applications of Path Integration. Wiley, New York (1981) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alcantara-Bonfim, O.F., de Florencio, J., Sa Barreto, F.C.: Chaotic dynamics in billiards using Bohm’s quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 58, R2693–R2696 (1998) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Sales, X., Florencio, J.: Bohmian quantum trajectories in a square billiard in the bouncing ball regime. Physica A 290, 101–106 (2001) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanz, A.S., Miret-Artes, S.: A trajectory-based understanding of quantum interference. J. Phys. A, Math. Theor. 41, 435303 (2008) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alhassid, Y.: The statistical theory of quantum dots. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 895–968 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noordam, L.D., Jones, R.R.: Probing Rydberg electron dynamics. J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2515–2532 (1997) ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haake, F.: Quantum Signatures of Chaos. Springer, Berlin (2001) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gutzwiller, M.C.: Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (1990) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holland, P.R.: Is quantum mechanics universal. In: Cushing, J.T., Fine, A., Goldstein, S. (eds.) Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 184, pp. 99–110. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Appleby, D.M.: Generic Bohmian trajectories of an isolated particle. Found. Phys. 29, 1863–1883 (1999) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Appleby, D.M.: Bohmian trajectories post-decoherence. Found. Phys. 29, 1885–1916 (1999) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bowman, G.: On the classical limit in Bohm’s theory. Found. Phys. 35, 605–625 (2005) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ban, B.L.: Violation of the correspondence principle: breakdown of the Bohm-Newton trajectory correspondence in a macroscopic system. Phys. Rev. A 61, 032105 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matzkin, A., Nurock, V.: Classical and Bohmian trajectories in semiclassical systems: Mismatch in dynamics, mismatch in reality? Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B 39, 17–40 (2008) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matzkin, A.: Rydberg wavepackets in terms of hidden-variables: de Broglie-Bohm trajectories. Phys. Lett. A 345, 31–37 (2005) zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matzkin, A.: Can Bohmian trajectories account for quantum recurrences having classical periodicities? Phys. Lett. A 361, 294–300 (2007) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leggett, A.: Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects. J. Phys., Condens. Matter 14, R415–R451 (2002) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    d’Espagnat, B.: Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Westview Press, Reading (1999) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zeh, H.D.: Measurement in Bohm’s versus Everett’s quantum theory. Found. Phys. 18, 723–730 (1988) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wiebe, N., Ballentine, L.E.: Quantum mechanics of Hyperion. Phys. Rev. A 72, 022109 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ballentine, L.E.: Classicality without decoherence. Found. Phys. 38, 916–922 (2008) zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Spectrométrie Physique (CNRS Unité 5588)Université Joseph-Fourier Grenoble-1Saint-Martin d’HèresFrance

Personalised recommendations