The Quantum World is not Built up from Correlations
It is known that the global state of a composite quantum system can be completely determined by specifying correlations between measurements performed on subsystems only. Despite the fact that the quantum correlations thus suffice to reconstruct the quantum state, we show, using a Bell inequality argument, that they cannot be regarded as objective local properties of the composite system in question. It is well known since the work of Bell, that one cannot have locally preexistent values for all physical quantities, whether they are deterministic or stochastic. The Bell inequality argument we present here shows this is also impossible for correlations among subsystems of an individual isolated composite system. Neither of them can be used to build up a world consisting of some local realistic structure. As a corrolary to the result we argue that entanglement cannot be considered ontologically robust. The Bell inequality argument has an important advantage over others because it does not need perfect correlations but only statistical correlations. It can therefore easily be tested in currently feasible experiments using four particle entanglement.
Keywordsontology quantum correlations Bell inequality entanglement
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bell J.S. (1964). “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox”. Physics 1, 195Google Scholar
- 2.N. D. Mermin, in a series of papers, tried to defend this fundamental interpretational difference between values of quantities and correlations. N. D. Mermin, “What is quantum mechanics trying to tell us?,”Am. J. Phys. 66, 753 (1998); “What do these correlations know about reality? Nonlocality and the absurd,”Found. Phys. 29, 571 (1999); “The Ithaca interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Pramana 51, 549 (1998).Google Scholar
- 6.D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, “Going beyond Bell’s theorem,” in Bell’s theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe. M. Kafatos, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989), p. 69; D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, “Bell’s theorem without inequalities,” Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990).Google Scholar
- 8.J. Barrett, “Information processing in non-signalling theories,” Los Alamos e-print archive, http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0508211.Google Scholar
- 9.W. K. Wootters, “Local accessibility of quantum states,” in Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. W. H. Zurek, ed. (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1990), p. 39.Google Scholar
- 10.See the first paper by Mermin in Ref. 2.Google Scholar
- 11.J. F. Clauser, W. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).Google Scholar
- 18.C. A. Sackett et al., “Experimental entanglement of four particles,” Nature 404, 256 (2000); Z. Zhao et al., “Experimental violation of local realism by four-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 180401 (2003); Z. Zhao et al., “Experimental demonstration of five-photon entanglement and open-destination teleportation,” Nature (London) 430, 54 (2004); M. Eibl et al., “Experimental observation of four-photon entanglement from parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 200403 (2003).Google Scholar