Group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence

Article

Abstract

Preference relations are very useful to express decision makers’ preferences over alternatives in the process of group decision-making. However, the multiple self-confidence levels are not considered in existing preference relations. In this study, we define the preference relation with self-confidence by taking multiple self-confidence levels into consideration, and we call it the preference relation with self-confidence. Furthermore, we present a two-stage linear programming model for estimating the collective preference vector for the group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence. Finally, numerical examples are used to illustrate the two-stage linear programming model, and a comparative analysis is carried out to show how self-confidence levels influence on the group decision-making results.

Keywords

Preference relations Self-confidence levels Collective preference vector Linear programming model 

References

  1. Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Alcalá-Fdez, J., & Porcel, C. (2008). A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 23, 155–175.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Cabrerizo, F. J., Chiclana, F., Al-Hmouz, R., Morfeq, A., Balamash, A. S., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Fuzzy decision making and consensus: Challenges. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29(3), 1109–1118.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabrerizo, F. J., Pérez, I. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2010). Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, X., Zhang, H. J., & Dong, Y. C. (2015). The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: A survey. Information Fusion, 24, 72–83.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiclana, F., Garcia, J. M. Tapia, Moral, M. J. Del, & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2013). A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Information Sciences, 221, 110–123.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (1998). Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 97, 33–48.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., & Herrera, F. (2009). Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: A characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 17(1), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong, Y. C., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 45, 780–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong, Y. C., Li, C. C., & Herrera, F. (2016). Connecting the linguistic hierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and its uses to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information. Information Sciences, 367–368, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong, Y. C., Li, C. C., Xu, Y. F., & Gu, X. (2015). Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24, 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dong, Y. C., & Zhang, H. J. (2014). Multiperson decision making with different preference representation structures: A direct consensus framework and its properties. Knowledge-Based Systems, 58, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong, Y. C., Zhang, H. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2016). Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decision Support Systems, 84, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fodor, J., & Roubens, (1994). Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrera, F., & Martínez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8, 746–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., & Alonso, S. (2007). Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part B, 37(1), 176–189.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., & Luque, M. (2004). Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 98–109.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, C. C., Dong, Y. C., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Martínez, L. (2017). Personalized individual semantics in computing with words for supporting linguistic group decision making. An application on consensus reaching. Information Fusion, 33, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Orlovsky, S. A. (1978). Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(3), 155–167.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Pérez, I. J., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2010). A mobile decision support system for dynamic group decision making problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 40(6), 1244–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanino, T. (1984). Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12(2), 117–131.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Ureña, R., Chiclana, F., Fujita, H., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015a). Confidence-consistency driven group decision making approach with incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ureña, R., Chiclana, F., Morente, J. A., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015b). Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making: A review and future trends. Information Sciences, 302, 14–32.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wen, X., Yan, M., Xian, J., Yue, R., & Peng, A. (2016). Supplier selection in supplier chain management using Choquet integral-based linguistic operators under fuzzy heterogeneous environment. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 15, 307–330.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zadeh, L. A. (2011). A note on Z-numbers. Information Sciences, 181, 2923–2932.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenqi Liu
    • 1
  • Yucheng Dong
    • 1
  • Francisco Chiclana
    • 2
  • Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
    • 3
  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
    • 3
  1. 1.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Faculty of TechnologyDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK
  3. 3.DECSAIUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations