Advertisement

Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 123–139 | Cite as

Intuitionistic and interval-valued intutionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group

  • Zeshui Xu
  • Ronald R. YagerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Szmidt and Kacprzyk (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3070:388–393, 2004a) introduced a similarity measure, which takes into account not only a pure distance between intuitionistic fuzzy sets but also examines if the compared values are more similar or more dissimilar to each other. By analyzing this similarity measure, we find it somewhat inconvenient in some cases, and thus we develop a new similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Then we apply the developed similarity measure for consensus analysis in group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, and finally further extend it to the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set theory.

Keywords

Group decision making Intuitionistic fuzzy set Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set Similarity measure Consensus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atanassov, K. (1984). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In V. Sgurev (Ed.), VII ITKR’s Session, Sofia (June 1983). Central Sci. and Tech. Library, Bulg. Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
  2. Atanassov K. (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Theory and applications. Physica-Verlag, HeidelbergCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Atanassov K., Gargov G. (1989) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 31: 343–349MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Atanassov K., Pasi G., Yager R.R. (2005) Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making. International Journal of Systems Science 36: 859–868MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bustince H., Herrera F, Montero J. (2007) Fuzzy sets and their extensions: Representation, aggregation and models. Physica-Verlag, HeidelbergzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Deschrijver G., Cornelis C., Kerre E.E. (2004) On the representation of intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 12: 45–61CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Deschrijver G., Kerre E.E. (2003) On the composition of intuitionistic fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 136: 333–361MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Grzegorzewski P. (2004) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 148: 319–328MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Herrera F., Martínez L., Sánchez P.J. (2005) Manahging non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 166: 115–132Google Scholar
  10. Hung W.L., Yang M.S. (2004) Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance. Pattern Recognition letters 25: 1603–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Li D.F., Cheng C.T. (2002) New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recognition letters 23: 221–225CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Mitchell H.B. (2003) On the Dengfeng–Chuntian similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters 24: 3101–3104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Szmidt E., Kacprzyk J. (2000) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114: 505–518MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Szmidt E., Kacprzyk J. (2002) Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control and Cybernetics 31: 1037–1053zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Szmidt E., Kacprzyk J. (2004a) A similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in supporting medical diagnostic reasoning. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3070: 388–393zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Szmidt, E., & Kacprzyk, J. (2004b). A concept of similarity for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its use in group decision making. In Proceedings of international joint conference on neural networks & IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, Vol. 2, 25–29 July 2004, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 1129–1134.Google Scholar
  18. Xu Z.S. (2007) Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Information Sciences 177: 2363–2379MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Xu Z.S. (2008) Intuitionistic fuzzy information: Aggregation theory and applications. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu Z.S., Yager R.R. (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of General Systems 35: 417–433MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Zadeh L.A. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338–353MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Machine Intelligence InstituteIona CollegeNew RochelleUSA

Personalised recommendations