Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 387–397 | Cite as

A uniform approach of linguistic truth values in sensor evaluation

Article

Abstract

During the sensor evaluation procedure, each valuator uses his/her own ordinary linguistic truth values for the same factor because of different preference. That will brings some disadvantages to aggregate the information. For a uniform criterion, the standard linguistic truth value (SLTV) set is proposed. Based on the former hypothesis of transformation models of linguistic truth values, four transformation models are discussed: the model of point to point, the model of fuzzy set to point, the model of point to fuzzy set and the model of fuzzy set to fuzzy set. An example is to analyze it. Using the applicability measure we can choose appropriate SLTV for the different sensory evaluation system.

Keywords

Linguistic truth value Standard linguistic truth value Sensor evaluation 

Abbreviation

SLTV

Standard linguistic truth value

OLTV

Ordinary linguistic truth value

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Herrera F., Herrera-Viedma E. (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115: 67–82MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Herrera F., Herrera-Viedma E., Martinez L. (2000) A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114: 43–58MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Herrera F., Herrera-Viedma E., Verdegay J.L. (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78: 73–87CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Kawabata S., Niwa M. (1996) Objective measurement of fabric hand. In: Raheel M., Dekker M.(eds) Modern textile characterization methods. Marcel Dekker, INC, New York, pp 329–354Google Scholar
  5. Pei Z., Jiang B.Q., Yi L.Z., Xu Y. (2007) Semantics properties of compound evaluating syntagms. In: Castillo O., et al. (eds). Theoretical advances and applications of fuzzy logic and soft computing, advance in soft computing. Heidelberg, Springer Berlin, pp 828–831Google Scholar
  6. Xu Y., Liu J., Ruan D., Lee T. T. (2006) On the consistency of rule bases based on lattice-valued first-order logic LF(X). International Journal of Intelligent Systems 21: 399–424MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Zeng, X., Ding, Y., & Koehl, L. (2004). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic model for sensory fabric hand evaluation. In D. Ruan & X. Zeng (Eds.), Intelligent sensory evaluation (pp. 217–234). Berlin: Springer. February.Google Scholar
  8. Zeng X., Koehl L. (2003) Representation of the subjective evaluation of fabric hand using fuzzy techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 18(3): 355–366MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Zeng X., Koehl L., Sahnoun M., Bueno W.A., Renner M. (2004) Integration of human knowledge and measured data for optimization of fabric hand. International Journal of General Systems 33(2): 243–258MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zou, L., Das, P., Xu, Y., & Meng, D. (2005). Soft-resolution method of linguistic hedges lattice-valued first-order logic. In Proceedings of 8th International Joint Conference on Information Science, July 21–26, 2005, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 372–376.Google Scholar
  11. Zou L., Liu X., & Xu Y. (2005). Resolution method of linguistic truth-valued propositional logic. In: Zhao M., Shi Z. (eds) Proceedings of international conference on neural networks and brain. IEEE Press, Beijing, China, pp 1996–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zou, L., Liu, X., & Xu, Y. (2007). A Method of linguistic truth-valued reasoning in risk assessment, In C. Huang, C. Frey, & J. Feng (Eds.), Advances in studies on risk analysis and crisis response, proceedings of the first international conference on risk analysis and crisis response, September 22-26, 2007, Shanghai, China, pp. 395–399.Google Scholar
  13. Zou, L., Ma, J., & Xu, Y. (2006). A Framework of linguistic truth-valued propositional logic based on lattice implication algebra. In Y.-Q. Zhang & T. Y. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, May 10–12, 2006, Atlanta, GA, pp. 574–577.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer and Information TechnologyLiaoning Normal UniversityDalianPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Mathematics College Liaoning Normal UniversityDalianPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Intelligent Control and Development CenterSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations