Advertisement

Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 17–34 | Cite as

Extension of the LINMAP for multiattribute decision making under Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy environment

  • Deng-Feng Li
Article

Abstract

The aim of this article is further extending the linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) to develop a new methodology for solving multiattribute decision making (MADM) problems under Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) environments. The LINMAP only can deal with MADM problems in crisp environments. However, fuzziness is inherent in decision data and decision making processes. In this methodology, Atanassov’s IF sets are used to describe fuzziness in decision information and decision making processes by means of an Atanassov’s IF decision matrix. A Euclidean distance is proposed to measure the difference between Atanassov’s IF sets. Consistency and inconsistency indices are defined on the basis of preferences between alternatives given by the decision maker. Each alternative is assessed on the basis of its distance to an Atanassov’s IF positive ideal solution (IFPIS) which is unknown a prior. The Atanassov’s IFPIS and the weights of attributes are then estimated using a new linear programming model based upon the consistency and inconsistency indices defined. Finally, the distance of each alternative to the Atanassov’s IFPIS can be calculated to determine the ranking order of all alternatives. A numerical example is examined to demonstrate the implementation process of this methodology. Also it has been proved that the methodology proposed in this article can deal with MADM problems under not only Atanassov’s IF environments but also both fuzzy and crisp environments.

Keywords

Linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) Multiattribute decision making Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) set Fuzzy set Preference information Distance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atanassov K.T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20, 87–96zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Atanassov K.T. (1999). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Springer-Verlag, HeidelbergzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Burillo P., Bustince H. (1996). Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79, 403–405zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlsson C., Fuller R. (2000). Multiobjective linguistic optimization. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115, 5–10zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen S.M., Tan J.M. (1994). Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 67, 163–172zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen C.T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114, 1–9zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De S.K., Biswas R., Roy A.R. (2001). An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 117, 209–213zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Delgado M., Verdegay J.L., Vila M.A. (1992). Linguistic decision-making models. International Journal of Intelligent System 7, 479–492zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deschrijver G., Kerre E.E. (2007). On the position of intuitionistic fuzzy set theory in the framework of theories modelling imprecision. Information Sciences 177, 1860–1866zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Erol I., Ferrell W.G. (2003). A methodology for selection problems with multiple conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria. International Journal of Production Economics 86, 187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher B. (2003). Fuzzy environmental decision-making: applications to air pollution. Atmospheric Environment 37, 1865–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta, J. P., Chevalier, A., & Dutta, S. (2003). Multicriteria model for risk evaluation for venture capital firms in an emerging market context. European Journal of Operational Research, available online 10 April (In Press).Google Scholar
  13. Herrera F., Martinez L., Sanchez P.J. (2005). Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 166, 115–132zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrera F., Viedma E.H.-V., Verdegay J.L. (1996). A model of consensus in group decision making under Linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78, 73–87CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Hong D.H., Choi C.H. (2000). Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114, 103–113zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu Y.-C., Hu J.-S., Chen R.-S., Tzeng G.-H. (2004). Assessing weights of product attributes from fuzzy knowledge in a dynamic environment. European Journal of Operational Research 154, 125–143zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Berlin Heidelberg, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  18. Li D.-F. (2005a). An approach to fuzzy multiattribute decision making under uncertainty. Information Sciences 169, 97–112zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Li D.-F. (2005b). Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 70, 73–85zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Li D.-F. (2004). Some measures of dissimilarity in intuitionistic fuzzy structures. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 68, 115–122zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Li D.-F., Cheng C.-T. (2002). New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recognition Letters 23, 221–225zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, D.-F., & Yang, J.-B. (2003). A multiattribute decision making approach using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In Proceedings of the Conference EUSFLAT 2003, Zittau, Germany, (Vol. 1, pp. 183–186).Google Scholar
  23. Li D.-F., Yang J.-B. (2004). Fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making in fuzzy environments. Information Sciences 158, 263–275zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Li L., Yuan X.-H., Xia Z.-Q. (2007). Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 73, 84–88CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu H.-W., Wang G.-J. (2007). Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. European Journal of Operational Research 179, 220–233zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pankowska A., Wygralak A. (2006). General IF-sets with triangular norms and their applications to group decision making. Information Sciences 176, 2713–2754zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Srinivasan V., Shocker A.D. (1973). Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preference. Psychometrica 38, 337–342zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. Stanciulescu C., Fortemps Ph., Install M., Wertz V. (2003). Multiobjective fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy decision variables. European Journal of Operational Research 149, 654–675zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Szmidt E., Kacprzyk J. (1996a). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. NIFS 2, 15–32MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Szmidt E., Kacprzyk J. (1996b). Remarks on some applications of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in decision making. NIFS 2, 22–31zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. Szmidt, E., & Kacprzyk, J. (1996c). Group decision making via intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In FUBEST’96, Sofia, Bulgaria, pp. 107–112.Google Scholar
  32. Szmidt, E., & Kacprzyk, J. (1997). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets for more realistic group decision making. In International conference on transition to advanced market institutions and economies, Warsaw, pp. 430–433.Google Scholar
  33. Szmidt E., Kacprzyk J. (2001). Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114, 505–518CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang J., Lin Y.-I. (2003). A fuzzy multicriteria group decision making approach to select configuration items for software development. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 134, 343–363zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang R.-C., Chuu S.-J. (2004). Group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system. European Journal of Operational Research 154, 563–572zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu Z.-Sh. (2004). A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences 166, 19–30zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu Z.-Sh. (2007). Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Information Sciences 177, 2363–2379zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. Zadeh L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–356zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SciencesShenyang Institute of Aeronautical EngineeringShenyangChina
  2. 2.Department FiveDalian Naval AcademyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations