Complementarity can be considered as the weirdest idea associated with quantum mechanics. For Bohr, Complementarity is important in order to be able to convey successfully the non-classical features of quantum mechanics. This paper discusses the epistemic and ontological implications of different new experiments that attempt to detect complementarity. Complementarity has surely survived the attempts to overcome it, yet some of these experiments have led to a more general form of complementarity. Others claim to be able to differentiate among the different interpretations of quantum physics. Nonetheless, such claims have revealed contradictory representations of the ontological picture of the universe. Hence, Bohr’s position is still valid.
KeywordsPhilosophy of physics Wave particle duality Complementarity Quantum mechanics
I would like to profoundly thank one of the referees for his important and extensive comments, for his time and dedication, and for his patience that allowed me to rework my paper until it has been accepted for publication.
- Afshar, S. (2007a). Violation of Bohr’s complementarity: One slit or both? https://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0701/0701039.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2008.
- Afshar, S. (2007b). Violation of the principle of Complementarity, and its implications. https://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0701/0701027.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2008.
- Afshar, S., et al. (2007). Paradox in wave–particle duality. https://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0702/0702188.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2008.
- Beller, M., & Fine, A. (1994). Bohr’s response to EPR. In Niels Bohr & Contemporary Philosophy (Eds.), Faye and Folse (pp. 1–31). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bilban, T. (2013). Husserl’s reconsideration of the observation process and its possible connections with quantum mechanics: Supplementation of informational foundations of quantum theory. Prolegomena,12(2), 459–486.Google Scholar
- Bohr, N. (1927). In Kalckar, J. (Ed.), Niels Bohr collected works. Volume 6: Foundations of quantum physics I. Amsterdam: Elsevier (1985).Google Scholar
- Bohr, N. (1928). The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. In J. Wheeler & W. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 87–126). Princeton: Princeton University Press (1983).Google Scholar
- Bohr, N. (1949). Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics. In Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.), (1949, pp. 201–241).Google Scholar
- Bohr, N. (1955). Physical science and man’s position. In Favrholdt, D. (Ed.), Niel Bohr collected work (vol. 10, pp. 102–105). Amsterdam: Elsevier 1999. (pp. 810–813 from the origin).Google Scholar
- Bohr, N. (1958). Atomic physics and human knowledge. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Busch, P., & Shilladay, C. R. (2002). Uncertainty reconciles complementarity with joint measurability. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0207081v2. Accessed 23 Aug 2018.
- Camilleri, K. (2017). Why do we find Bohr Obscure?: Reading Bohr as a philosopher of experiment. In Faye, J., & Folse, H. (Eds.), Niels Bohr and the philosophy of physics: Twenty-first-century perspectives (pp. 19–46).Google Scholar
- Cartwright, N., Shomar, T., & Suarez, M. (1995). The tool box of science. In W. Herfel, et al. (Eds.), Theories and models in scientific processes. Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities (Vol. 44). Amsterdam: Rodpi.Google Scholar
- Chiao, R., Kwiat, P., & Steinberg, A. (1993). Faster than light. Scientific American, August (pp. 38–46).Google Scholar
- Clifton, B. (1999). Complementarity between position and momentum as a consequence of Kochen–Specker arguments. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9912108v1. Accessed 9 Aug 2017.
- Dieks, D. (2016). Niels Bohr and the formalism of quantum mechanics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306228312. Appeared also in Faye and Folse (Eds.) (2017).
- Dorato, M. (2016). Bohr’s relational holism and the classical-quantum interaction. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1608/1608.00205.pdf. Accessed 3 Nov 2019.
- Drezet, A. (2008). Complementarity and Afshar’s experiment. https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0508091v3.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2019.
- Drezet, A. (2011). Wave particle duality and the Afshar experiment. Progress in Physics,1, 57–64.Google Scholar
- Faye, J., & Folse, H. (Eds.). (1999). Niels Bohr’s philosophical writings. Vol. IV. Causality and complementarity. Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.Google Scholar
- Faye, J., & Folse, H. (Eds.). (2017). Niels Bohr and the philosophy of physics: Twenty-first-century perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
- Folse, H. (1985). The philosophy of Niels Bohr. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Folse, H. (1986). Niels Bohr complementarity and realism. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings of PSA),1, 96–104.Google Scholar
- Heisenberg, W. (1963). Interview with W. Heisenberg. In T. Kohn (Ed.), Archives for the history of quantum physics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
- Hiley, B. J., & Callaghan, R. E. (2006). What is erased in quantum erasure? Foundation of Physics, December. From Hilly’s Research gate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225787876_What_is_Erased_in_the_Quantum_Erasure.
- Home, D. (2013). Bohr’s philosophy of wave–particle complementarity. Resonance, pp. 905–916, http://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/reso/018/10/0905-0916. October, 2013.
- Honner, J. (1987). The description of nature: Niels Bohr and the philosophy of quantum physics. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Jammer, M. (1966). The conceptual development of quantum mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
- Kauark-Leite, P. (2017). Transcendental versus quantitiative meanings of Bohr’s complementarity principle. In Faye, J., & Folse, H. (Eds.), Niels Bohr and the philosophy of physics: Twenty-first-century perspectives (pp. 67–90).Google Scholar
- Krips, H. (1987). The metaphysics of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Laudan, L. (1984). Explaining the success of science. In James Cushing (Ed.), Science and reality. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
- Lurçat, F. (2007). Understanding quantum mechanics with Bohr and Husserl. In Luciano Boi, Pierre Kerszberg, & Frédéric Patras (Eds.), Rediscovering phenomenology: Phenomenological essays on mathematical beings, physical reality, perception and consciousness (Phaenomenologica) (pp. 229–258). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pais, A. (1991). Niels Bohr’s times, in physics, philosophy, and polity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Perovic, S. (2017). Niels Bohr’s complementarity and quantum tunneling. In Fay and Folse (2017). http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/14031/1/Collection_Perovic_complementarity_tunneling_philsciarchives.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2019.Google Scholar
- Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.). (1949). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
- Shomar, T. (2013). Phenomenological realism, superconductivity and quantum mechanics. SaarBrucken: Lambert Academic Publication.Google Scholar