What Science Fiction Can Demonstrate About Novelty in the Context of Discovery and Scientific Creativity
Four instances of how science fiction contributes to the elucidation of novelty in the context of discovery are considered by extending existing discussions on temporal and use-novelty. In the first instance, science fiction takes an already well-known theory and produces its own re-interpretation; in the second instance, the scientific account is usually straightforward and whatever novelty that may occur would be more along the lines of how the science is deployed to extra-scientific matters; in the third instance, science fiction takes an idea that appears impossible within the delimitations of reality and produces a universe where such a possibility becomes feasible; and in the fourth instance, science fiction extends from an idea already known at the time of the work’s production to simulate a possibility that could emerge should the extension be experimentally viable. However, the article will not end with a mere evaluation of these instances, but also proposes instances on how science fiction could contribute to new ways of experiencing, discerning, and working with scientific knowledge.
KeywordsScience fiction Future Novelty Kuhn Reichenbach Theories of science
- Arabatzis, T. (2006). On the inextricability of the context of discovery and the context of justification. In J. Schickore & F. Steinle (Eds.), Revisiting discovery and justification: Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction (Vol. 14, pp. 3–22). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arsene, I., Bearden, I. G., Beavis, D., Besliu, C., Budick, B., Bøggild, H., et al. (2005). Quark–gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? The perspective from the BRAHMS experiment. First Three Years of Operation of RHIC,757(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Benford, G. (1986). Is there a technological fix for the human condition? In G. E. Slusser & E. S. Rabkin (Eds.), Hard science fiction (pp. 82–98). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Benford, G. (1995). Matter’s end. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
- Benford, G. (1998). COSM. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
- Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. J. (1995). The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Carrigan, N., & Carrigan, R. (1976). Minotaur in a mushroom maze. Analog, 96(May-July), 12–58, 104–154, 48–107. Physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Debbe, R., Gushue, S., Moskowitz, B., Olness, J., & Videbaek, F. (1995). The ring imaging Cerenkov detector for the BRAHMS experiment at RHIC. In Proceedings of the international workshop on ring imaging detectors (RICH’ 95) (pp. 1–5). Uppsala, Sweden: Brookhaven National Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/27/019/27019954.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2017.
- Fischer, W. (2017). RHIC run overview. Retrieved June 25, 2017, from http://www.agsrhichome.bnl.gov/RHIC/Runs/#Run-5. Accessed 25 June 2017.
- Forward, R. L. (1986). When science writes fiction. In G. E. Slusser & E. S. Rabkin (Eds.), Hard science fiction. Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Francis, M. R. (2016). A GUT feeling about physics. Symmetry magazine. Retrieved from http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/a-gut-feeling-about-physics. Accessed 3 May 2017.
- Gelis, F., Iancu, E., Jalilian-Marian, J., & Venugopalan, R. (2010). The color glass condensate. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science,60(1), 463–489. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hacking, I. (2016). Paradigms. In R. J. Richards & L. Daston (Eds.), Kuhn’s structure of scientific revolutions at fifty: Reflections on a science classic (pp. 12–30). Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Hanson, N. R. (1965). Patterns of discovery: Inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. London: Syndics of the Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Klein, G. (2000). From images of science to science fiction. In P. Parrinder (Ed.), Learning from other worlds: Estrangement, cognition, and the politics of science fiction and utopia (pp. 119–126). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
- Kunszt, Z. (2012). Unstable particles in quantum mechanics, analytic S-matrix theory and quantum field theory. CERN. Retrieved from http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=0&sessionId=0&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=174430. Accessed 3 Mar 2019.
- Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lavenda, B. (2015). The unobservable universe. In Where physics went wrong (pp. 15–72). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.Google Scholar
- Lem, S. (1984). Microworlds: Writings on science fiction and fantasy. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
- Lenoir, T. (1997). Instituting science: The cultural production of scientific disciplines. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Levin, J. (2016). Gravitational blue waves. AEON magazine. Retrieved from https://aeon.co/essays/how-joe-weber-s-gravity-ripples-turned-out-to-be-all-noise. Accessed 31 Mar 2018.
- Li, B.-A., & Tilley, M. (2001). Uranium–uranium collisions at relativistic energies. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 55, 165–167.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, S. D. (2017). The ill-logic of alternative facts (sic). Union of Concerned Scientists. Blog. Retrieved June 10, 2017, from http://blog.ucsusa.org/science-blogger/the-ill-logic-of-alternative-facts-sic. Accessed 10 June 2017.
- Mody, C. C. M. (2015). What do scientists and engineers do all day? On the structure of scientific normalcy. In W. J. Devlin & A. Bokulich (Eds.), Kuhn’s structure of scientific revolutions: 50 years on (pp. 91–104). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations an the structure of knowledge. Illinois, Chicago: Phoenix Books, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Reisch, G. A. (2016). Aristotle in the cold war: On the origins of Thomas Kuhn’s the structure of scientific revolutions. In R. J. Richards & L. Daston (Eds.), Kuhn’s structure of scientific revolutions at fifty: Reflections on a science classic (pp. 12–30). Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Schiemann, G. (2006). Inductive justification and discovery: On Hans Reichenbach’s foundation of the autonomy of the philosophy of science. In J. Schickore & F. Steinle (Eds.), Revisiting discovery and justification: Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction (pp. 23–39). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schweber, S. S. (2003). Quantum field theory. In M. J. Nye (Ed.), The modern physical and mathematical sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 375–393). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- The Safety of the LHC. (2004). CERN. Retrieved from https://press.cern/backgrounders/safety-lhc. Accessed 10 June 2017.
- Walton, K. L. (2015). In other shoes: Music, metaphor, empathy, existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar