Whose Art Are We Talking About?
- 447 Downloads
Jeannette Pols and Tamar Sharon kindly reviewed my case study of the art of living with technology as an engagement with technomoral change. I am indebted to them for their careful reading and critical suggestions to further elaborate the project. In my response I focus on the question whose art we are talking about, while further elucidating the reflexivity addressed in my essay. I conclude with some remarks on what we can learn from micro studies like the one presented for macro level thinking on the ‘art of becoming’ with technology in a surveillance society.
KeywordsArt of living Telecare Technomoral change Reflexivity Relational being
- Boyd, D. (2010). Making sense of privacy and publicity. SXSW. Austin, Texas, March 13. Retrieved 09 March 2015, from: http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/2010/SXSW2010.html.
- Glascock, A. P., & Kutzik, D. M. (2006). The impact of behavioral monitoring technology on the provision of healthcare in the home. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12, 59–78.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Kamphof, I. (2013). Samenwerken. Over mensen en dingen in zorgnetwerken. Ethische Perspectieven, 23(2), 124–136.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.