Advertisement

Foundations of Science

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 329–332 | Cite as

Ethics in Times of Posthumanism

  • Galit Wellner
Commentary

Abstract

This commentary is an attempt to rethink the ethics of taking care in posthumanist times. It is an effort to combine ethics, posthumanism and psychological theories. I examine how the psychological notion of long-term well-being can serve as an ethical yardstick and how it can be relevant to non-humans.

Keywords

Code Orientation SDT Well-being 

References

  1. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Gomel, E. (2011). Science (fiction) and posthuman ethics: Redefining the human. The European Legacy, 16(3), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Koopman, C. (2013). Genealogy as critique: Foucault and the problems of modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Kroes, P., & Verbeek, P.-P. (Eds.). (2014). Introduction: The moral status of technical artefacts. In The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 1–9). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on Eudamonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology. Phenomenology and the Science of Mind: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism?. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ben Gurion University of the NegevTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations