Foundations of Science

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 339–348 | Cite as

The Art of Living with ICTs: The Ethics–Aesthetics of Vulnerability Coping and Its Implications for Understanding and Evaluating ICT Cultures

  • Mark CoeckelberghEmail author


This essay shows that a sharp distinction between ethics and aesthetics is unfruitful for thinking about how to live well with technologies, and in particular for understanding and evaluating how we cope with human existential vulnerability, which is crucially mediated by the development and use of technologies such as electronic ICTs. It is argued that vulnerability coping is a matter of ethics and art: it requires developing a kind of art and techne in the sense that it always involves technologies and specific styles of experiencing and dealing with vulnerability, which depend on social and cultural context. It is suggested that we try to find better, perhaps less modern styles of coping with our vulnerability, recognize limits to our attempts to “design” our new forms, and explore what kinds of technologies we need for this project.


Ethics Aesthetics The good life Virtue Information and communication technology Vulnerability Culture Forms of life Techne Design 


  1. Arendt, H. (1992). In R. Beiner (Ed.), Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (2003). In J. Kohn (Ed.), Responsibility and judgment. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics (trans. R. Crisp). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bostrom, N. (2005). The fable of the dragon tyrant. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(5), 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coeckelbergh, M. (2007). Imagination and principles: An essay on the role of imagination in moral reasoning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). Growing moral relations: Critique of moral status ascription. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coeckelbergh, M. (2013). Human being @ risk: Enhancement, technology, and the evaluation of vulnerability transformations. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coeckelbergh, M. (2015). Moral craftsmanship. In S. Moran, D. Cropley, & J. Kaufman (Eds.), The ethics of creativity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. de Mul, J. (2006). De domesticatie van het noodlot: De wedergeboorte van de tragedie uit de geest van de technologie. Kampen: Klement.Google Scholar
  10. Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and experience: Essays in technology and modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and moral imagination. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Milliken, J. (2010). Aristotle’s aesthetic ethics. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44(2), 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. van de Poel, I. (2005). Engineering design ethics. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
  16. Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical re flections on technology, agency, and design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.De Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations