Many-Measurements or Many-Worlds? A Dialogue
- 212 Downloads
Many advocates of the Everettian interpretation consider that theirs is the only approach to take quantum mechanics really seriously, and that this approach allows to deduce a fantastic scenario for our reality, one that consists of an infinite number of parallel worlds that branch out continuously. In this article, written in dialogue form, we suggest that quantum mechanics can be taken even more seriously, if the many-worlds view is replaced by a many-measurements view. This allows not only to derive the Born rule, thus solving the measurement problem, but also to deduce a one-world non-spatial reality, providing an even more fantastic scenario than that of the multiverse.
KeywordsMeasurement problem Many-worlds Parallel universes Hidden-measurement Bloch-sphere
- Aerts, D. (1999). The stuff the world is made of: Physics and reality. pp. 129–183. In D. Aerts, J. Broekaert, E. Mathijs (Eds.), The White Book of ‘Einstein Meets Magritte’. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 274 pp.Google Scholar
- Aerts, D. (2014). Quantum theory and human perception of the macro-world. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00554.
- Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014a). The unreasonable success of quantum probability I: Quantum measurements as uniform measurements. arXiv:1401.2647 [quant-ph].
- Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014b). The unreasonable success of quantum probability II: Quantum measurements as universal measurements. arXiv:1401.2650 [quant-ph].
- Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014c). The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution to the measurement problem. Annals of Physics. doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2014.09.020.
- Aerts, D. (1998b). The entity and modern physics: The creation-discovery view of reality. In E. Castellani (Ed.), Interpreting bodies: Classical and quantum objects in modern physics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Deutsch, D. (1998). The fabric of reality. London: Penguin Book.Google Scholar
- DeWitt, B., & Graham, N. (Eds.). (1973). The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Feynman, R. P. (1992). The character of physical law. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Gleason, A. M. (1957). Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. Jounal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 6, 885–893.Google Scholar
- Jauch, J. M., & Piron, C. (1963). Can hidden variables be excluded in quantum mechanics? Helvetica Physics Acta, 36, 827–837.Google Scholar
- Kochen, S., & Specker, E. P. (1967). The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Jounal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59–87.Google Scholar
- Kolmogorov, A. N. (1950). Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitrechnung, Ergebnisse Der Mathematik (1933); translated as Foundations of Probability. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Laplace, P. S. (1951). A philosophical essay on probabilities. New York: Dover Publications Inc., English edition 1951 (1814).Google Scholar
- Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014). God may not play dice, but human observers surely do. Foundations of Science. doi: 10.1007/s10699-014-9352-4.
- Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2013). Using simple elastic bands to explain quantum mechanics: a conceptual review of two of Aerts’ machine-models. Central European Journal of Physics, 11, 147–161.Google Scholar
- Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., & Wallace, D. (Eds.). (2010). Many worlds? Quantum theory and reality. Everett: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Streater, R. F., & Wightman, A. S. (1964). PCT, spin and statistics, and all that. New York: W. A. Benjamin Inc.Google Scholar
- Von Neumann, J. (1932). Grundlehren. Math. Wiss. XXXVIIIGoogle Scholar
- von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar