On the Import of Constraints in Complex Dynamical Systems
- First Online:
- 273 Downloads
Complexity arises from interaction dynamics, but its forms are co-determined by the operative constraints within which the dynamics are expressed. The basic interaction dynamics underlying complex systems is mostly well understood. The formation and operation of constraints is often not, and oftener under appreciated. The attempt to reduce constraints to basic interaction fails in key cases. The overall aim of this paper is to highlight the key role played by constraints in shaping the field of complex systems. Following an introduction to constraints (Sect. 1), the paper develops the roles of constraints in specifying forms of complexity (Sect. 2) and illustrates the roles of constraints in formulating the fundamental challenges to understanding posed by complex systems (Sect. 3).
KeywordsComplexity Complex systems Dynamical constraints Lagrangian dynamics Organization Dynamical understanding
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barandiaran, X., & Ruiz-mirazo, K. (Eds.) (2008). Modelling autonomy: Simulating the essence of life and cognition. BioSystems, 91(2).Google Scholar
- Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2011). Complex biological mechanisms: Cyclic, oscillatory and autonomous. In C. A. Hooker (Ed.) Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 10, pp. 259–288). Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Bennett C. (1985) Dissipation, information, computational complexity and the definition of organization. In: Pines D. Emerging syntheses in science, proceedings of the founding workshops of the santa fe institute. Addison Wesley, Redwood CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Bennett, C. (1992). Logical depth and other algorithmically defined properties of finite objects. In Proceedings, workshop on physics and computation, IEEE, pp. 75–77.Google Scholar
- Bishop R. C. (2011) Metaphysical and epistemological issues in complex systems. In: Hooker C. A. (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the philosophy of science. North Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 107–138Google Scholar
- Bloch, A. M. (2003). Nonholonomic mechanics and control. Springer, New York, See http://www.cds.caltech.edu/mechanics_and_control/about_this_book/ for corrections and additions, incl. internet supplement.
- Butterfield, J. (2004a) Between laws and models: Some philosophical morals of Lagrangian mechanics. Available at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001937/. Accessed Apr 2009.
- Butterfield, J. (2004b). On Hamilton-Jacobi theory as a classical root of quantum theory. In A. C. Elitzur, S. Dolev, & N. Kolenda (Eds.), Quo Vadis quantum mechanics? Possible developments in quantum theory in the 21st century. New York, Springer. Available at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001193/. Accessed Apr 2009.
- Christensen, W. D., & Hooker, C. A. (2000a). Organised interactive construction: The nature of autonomy and the emergence of intelligence. In: A. Etxebberia, A. Moreno, & J. Umerez (Eds.), The contribution of artificial life and the sciences of complexity to the understanding of autonomous systems. Communication and Cognition, Special Edn (Vol. 17, No. 3–4, pp. 133–158).Google Scholar
- Christensen, W. D., & Hooker, C. A. (2002). Self-directed agents. In J. MacIntosh (Ed.), Naturalism, evolution and intentionality. Ottawa, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Special Supplementary Vol. 27, pp. 19–52.Google Scholar
- Clarke, D., & Proença, J. (2009). Coordination via interaction constraints I: Local logic. In F. Bonchi, D. Grohmann, & P. Spoletini, E. Tuosto (Eds.), ICE’09 structured interactions, EPTCS, 12, pp. 17–39. doi:10.4204/EPTCS.12.2.
- Dewar, R. L., Hudson, S. R., & Gibson, A. M. Action-gradient-minimizing pseudo-orbits and almost-invariant tori (preprint, submitted).Google Scholar
- Emmeche C., Koppe S., Stjernfelt F. (2000) Levels, emergence, and three versions of downward causation. In: Anderson P., Emmeche C., Finnemann N., Christiansen P. (Eds.), Downward causation: Minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 13–34Google Scholar
- Flannery, M. R. (2005). The enigma of nonholonomic constraints. American Journal of Physics, 73(3), 265–272. Available at http://www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/flannery/publications/AJP73_March2005_265-272.pdf Google Scholar
- Gell-Mann M. (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex. Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein H. (1950) Classical mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassGoogle Scholar
- Groß R., Dorigo M. (2007) Fifty years of self-assembly experimentation. In: Shen W.-M., Lipson H., Stoy K., Yim M. Proceedings of the workshop on self-reconfigurable robots/systems and applications. USC Information Science Institute, USAGoogle Scholar
- Hooker C. A. (1994) Idealisation, naturalism, and rationality: Some lessons from minimal rationality. Synthese 99: 181–231Google Scholar
- Hooker, C. A. (Ed.). (2011a) Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the philosophy of science. North Holland/Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Hooker C. A. (2011c) Introduction to philosophy of complex systems. Part B: Aninitial scientific paradigm + philosophy of science for complex systems. In: Hooker C. A. (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the philosophy of science. North Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 843–912Google Scholar
- Hooker C. A. (2011d) Conceptualising reduction, emergence and self-organisation in complex dynamical systems. In: Hooker C. A. (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the philosophy of science. North Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 197–224Google Scholar
- Kaufman S. (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Mackworth A. K. (2009) Agents bodies constraints dynamics evolution. AI Magazine, Spring, pp 7–28Google Scholar
- Marr D. (1982) Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
- Maynard-Smith J., Szathmary E. (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Moreno A., Ruiz-Mirazo K., Barandiaran X. (2011) The impact of the paradigm of complexity on the foundational frameworks of biology and cognitive science. In: Hooker C. A. (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the philosophy of science. North Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 313–336Google Scholar
- Newman S. A. (2011a) Complexity in organismal evolution. In: Hooker C. A. (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the philosophy of science. North Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 337–356Google Scholar
- Newman, S. A., & Bhat, R. (2008). Dynamical patterning modules: Physico-genetic determinants of morphological development and evolution. Physical Biology, 5, 015008. Available at http://stacks.iop.org/PhysBio/5/015008.
- Nolfi S. (2011) Behavior and cognition as a complex adaptive system: Insights from robotic experiments. In: Hooker C. A. (Ed.), Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the philosophy of science. North Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 445–467Google Scholar
- O’Connor T., & Wong, H. Y. (2002) Emergence. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/properties-emergent/
- Pattee, H. H. (1971). Physical theories of biological co-ordination. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 4, 255–276. Reprinted in M. Grene, E. Mendelsohn (Eds.), Topics in the philosophy of biology, Reidel, Amsterdam, 1976. doi:10.1017/S0033583500000640 (published online) 2009.
- Pattee H. H. (1973) The physical basis and origin of hierarchical control. In: Pattee H. H. (Ed.), Hierarchy theory: The challenge of complex systems. Geo. Braziller, New York, pp 71–108Google Scholar
- Pfeifer R., Bongard J. C. (2007) How the body shapes the way we think: A new view of intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
- Raynor A. (1977) Degrees of freedom: Living in dynamic boundaries. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Shalizi, C. R. (2006). Methods and techniques of complex systems science: An overview. In T. Deisboeck, J. Kresh (Eds.), Complex systems science in bio-medicine. Springer, New York. Also available at http://arXiv.org/abs/nlin/0307015.
- Subhankar R., & Shamanna, J. (2006) Understanding D’Alembert’s principle: System of pendulums. Available at http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0606/0606010v2.pdf.
- Szathmáry, E (2005). Life: In search of the simplest cell. Nature, 433(3), 469–470.Google Scholar
- Turing A. (1952) The chemical basis for morphogenesis. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences, 237(641), 37–72. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/92463.