It is argued that given the “anti-anthropomorphic” principle—that the universe is not structured for our benefit—modelling trade-offs will necessarily mean that many of our models will be context-specific. It is argued that context-specificity is not the same as relativism. The “context heuristic”—that of dividing processing into rich, fuzzy context-recognition and crisp, conscious reasoning and learning—is outlined. The consequences of accepting the impact of this human heuristic in the light of the necessity of accepting context-specificity in our modelling of complex systems is examined. In particular the development of “islands” or related model clusters rather than over-arching laws and theories. It is suggested that by accepting and dealing with context (rather than ignoring it) we can push the boundaries of science a little further.
KeywordsComplexity Context Generality Models Pragmatics Anthropomorphism
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Axtell R. L., Epstein J. M. (1994) Agent-based modelling: Understanding our creations. The Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute 9: 28–32Google Scholar
- Edmonds, B. (1999a). The pragmatic roots of context. CONTEXT’99, Trento, Italy, September 1999. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 1688, pp. 119–132).Google Scholar
- Edmonds, B. (1999b). Syntactic measures of complexity. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester. http://bruce.edmonds.name/thesis/.
- Edmonds, B. (2001). The use of models—making MABS actually work. In: S. Moss, & P. Davidsson (Eds.), Multi agent based simulation, Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 1979, pp. 15–32).Google Scholar
- Edmonds, B. (2002). Learning and exploiting context in agents. In Proceedings of the 1st international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS) (pp. 1231–1238). Bologna: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Edmonds, B. (2007a). Simplicity is not truth-indicative. In C. C. Gershenson, D. Aerts, & B. Edmonds (Eds.), Philosophy and complexity (pp. 65–80). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
- Edmonds, B. (2009). The nature of noise. In F. Squazzoni (Ed.) Epistemological aspects of computer simulation in the social sciences. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 5466, pp. 169–182).Google Scholar
- Edmonds, B., & Norling, E. (2007). Integrating learning and inference in multi-agent systems using cognitive context. In L. Antunes & K. Takadama (Eds.), Multi-agent-based simulation VII. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 4442, pp. 142–155).Google Scholar
- Hayes, P. (1995). Contexts in context. Context in knowledge representation and natural language, AAAI fall symposium, November 1997, Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
- Kokinov, B., & Grinberg, M. (2001). Simulating context effects in problem solving with AMBR. In V. Akman, P. Bouquet, R., Thomason, & R. A. Young (Eds.), Modelling and using context (Vol. 2116, pp. 221–234). Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
- McCarthy J., Hayes P. J. (1969) Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Machine Intelligence 4: 463–502Google Scholar
- Pearl J. (2000) Causality. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Zadrozny, W. (1997). A pragmatic approach to context. Context in knowledge representation and natural language, AAAI fall symposium, November 1997 Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar