Foundations of Science

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 179–183 | Cite as

Movements of discovery: the pragmatics of practice-based research

Commentary

Abstract

This commentary to Vanhoutte and Wynants’s paper “Performing phenomenology: negotiating presence in intermedial theatre” tries to ascertain whether the dialectics between the real and the virtual in CREW’s artistic and technological experiments, which the authors call a ‘strategy,’ implies an a-priori relation that is hard to reconcile to the ethos of discovering through doing proposed by postphenomenological research, and to an ‘empirical turn’ based in case studies and descriptive concreteness suggested by a ‘pragmatic phenomenology.’ I propose that the shift from live to mediated perception in CREW’s experimental productions, producing a multistable ontology, is less occasion for strategic dialectics and Benjaminian ‘illumination’ of our mediatized culture, than for an analytic perspective on what actually happens when the shift occurs and what this tells us about our relationship to digital technologies of reproduction.

Keywords

Postphenomenology Pragmatism Illusion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen R. (1997) Looking at motion pictures. In: Allen R., Smith M. (eds) Film theory and philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 76–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auslander Ph. (1999) Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Burch, N. (1969). Praxis du Cinéma. (1981) Theory of Film Practice (H. R. Lane, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ihde D. (1986) Experimental phenomenology: An introduction. State University of New York press, Albany, NY, pp 68–69Google Scholar
  5. Ihde D. (1990) Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
  6. Ihde D. (2003) If phenomenology is an Albatross, is post-phenomenology possible. In: Ihde D., Selinger E. (eds) Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  7. Ihde D. (2009) What is postphenomenology?. In: Ihde D. (eds) Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. State University of New York Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. Vanhoutte K., Wynants N. (2011) Performing phenomenology: Negotiating presence in intermedial theatre. Foundations of Science 16(2–3): 275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Walton K. (1984) Transparent pictures: On the nature of photographic realism. Critical Inquiry 11(2): 252–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Antwerp (Research Group on Visual Poetics)AntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations