Movements of discovery: the pragmatics of practice-based research
This commentary to Vanhoutte and Wynants’s paper “Performing phenomenology: negotiating presence in intermedial theatre” tries to ascertain whether the dialectics between the real and the virtual in CREW’s artistic and technological experiments, which the authors call a ‘strategy,’ implies an a-priori relation that is hard to reconcile to the ethos of discovering through doing proposed by postphenomenological research, and to an ‘empirical turn’ based in case studies and descriptive concreteness suggested by a ‘pragmatic phenomenology.’ I propose that the shift from live to mediated perception in CREW’s experimental productions, producing a multistable ontology, is less occasion for strategic dialectics and Benjaminian ‘illumination’ of our mediatized culture, than for an analytic perspective on what actually happens when the shift occurs and what this tells us about our relationship to digital technologies of reproduction.
KeywordsPostphenomenology Pragmatism Illusion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Auslander Ph. (1999) Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Burch, N. (1969). Praxis du Cinéma. (1981) Theory of Film Practice (H. R. Lane, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Ihde D. (1986) Experimental phenomenology: An introduction. State University of New York press, Albany, NY, pp 68–69Google Scholar
- Ihde D. (1990) Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
- Ihde D. (2003) If phenomenology is an Albatross, is post-phenomenology possible. In: Ihde D., Selinger E. (eds) Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
- Ihde D. (2009) What is postphenomenology?. In: Ihde D. (eds) Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. State University of New York Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar