Of Humans & Cyborgs, Caterpillars & Butterflies
- 178 Downloads
In response to Peter–Paul Verbeek’s and Paul Levinson’s reviews of my article ‘In Between Us,’ I comment on four criticisms. Firstly, my approach of ‘mediation as such’ does not endorse the view of mediation as secondary to mediata (i.e., entities), but does not exclude it either. Secondly, my concepts of “transparency of use” and of “context” are to be seen as philosophical ‘tools’ and not as mutually exclusive states. Thirdly, I agree with Levinson that technologies do indeed remediate, and mostly not for the worse. However, fourthly, at the same time we should always be on guard for their nefarious effects.
KeywordsPhilosophy of Technology Technological mediation Transparency
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Harman, G. (2002). Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
- Hodge, N. (2010, January 21). Texts, tweets saving haitians from the rubble. Texts, Tweets Saving Haitians From the Rubble | Danger Room | Wired.com. Wired. Retrieved February 11, 2010, from http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/01/texts-tweets-saving-haitians-from-the-rubble.
- Levinson P. (1997) The soft edge: A natural history and future of the information revolution. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Levinson, P. (2011). Skype and the Reality of Remdial Media. Foundations of Science. doi: 10.1007/s10699-011-9254-7
- Van Den Eede Y. (2010) In between us: On the transparency and opacity of technological mediation. Foundations of Science 16(2–3): 139–159Google Scholar
- Verbeek P. (2008) Cultivating humanity: Toward a non-humanist ethics of technology. In: Berg Olsen J.K., Selinger E., Riis S. (eds.) New waves in philosophy of technology, new waves in philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 241–266Google Scholar
- Verbeek, P.P. (2011). Expanding mediation theory. Foundations of Science. doi: 10.1007/s10699-011-9253-8.