Foundations of Science

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 379–385 | Cite as

Phenomenology, Ontology, and Quantum Physics

Commentary

Abstract

This essay is dominated by three themes that recur contrapuntally in Heisenberg’s writings: observation, description, and ontology—prompted always by a concern about the role played by the subjective inquirer in scientific meaning-making, and by the ontology of scientific claims. Among the related themes are; the tension between paradigmatic concerns with structure and philosophical concerns with reality, the possibility of scientific revolutions, such as relativity and quantum mechanics, that can overthrow the classical traditions of natural science and the inadequacy of a psychophysical parallelism for an epistemology of reason. The influence of Husserl and Heidegger is in his neokantian concern about the role of subjectivity. Heisenberg was a long-time friend of Heidegger and familiar with Heidegger’s hermeneutical phenomenology and its critique of Greek philosophy; he also contributed an essay to a Festschrift in Heidegger’s honor in 1959.

Keywords

Neokantian philosophy Heisenberg Wigner Schrödinger Human consciousness Measurement Contexts Practices Codes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Camilleri K. (2009) Heisenberg and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Heelan P. (1965) Quantum mechanics and objectivity: A study of the physical philosophy of Werner Heisenberg. Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Heelan P. (1970a) Quantum logic and classical logic: Their respective roles. Synthese 22: 3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heelan P. (1970b) Complementarity, context-dependence and quantum logic. Foundations of Physics 1: 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heelan P. (1983) Space perception and the philosophy of science. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  6. Heelan, P. (2008). The authority of science: A post-modern crisis. In D. Ginev (Ed.), Aspekte der Phänomenologischen Theorie der Wissenschaft (pp. 193–207), in series Orbis Phaenomenologicus. Konighausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  7. Heelan, P. (2010). The foundational authorities of science and theology. To be published in a collection by Guelph University, Toronto.Google Scholar
  8. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). SCM Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heisenberg, W. (1925). Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer and mechanischer Beziehungen. Zeitschrift fur Physik, 30, 879–893; trans. In B. L. van der Waerden (Ed.) Sources of quantum mechanics (New York, Dover: 1967), 261–276.Google Scholar
  10. Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der Quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift fur Physik 53: 172–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heisenberg, W. (1959). Grundlegende Voraussetzungen in der Physik der Elementarteilchen. In Martin Heidegger zum siebstigsten Geburtstag: Festschrift (pp. 291–297). Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar
  12. Lonergan, B. (1957). Insight: A study of human understanding (5th ed., 1992) Toronto: Toronto University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Ricoeur P. (1984) Time and narrative (Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scharff, R. (2011). Displacing epistemology: Being in the midst of technoscientific practice. Foundations of Science, 16(2–3), 227–243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gaston Professor of PhilosophyGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations