Ungrounded Dispositions in Quantum Mechanics
- First Online:
- 131 Downloads
General metaphysical arguments have been proposed in favour of the thesis that all dispositions have categorical bases (Armstrong; Prior, Pargetter, Jackson). These arguments have been countered by equally general arguments in support of ungrounded dispositions (Molnar, Mumford). I believe that this controversy cannot be settled purely on the level of abstract metaphysical considerations. Instead, I propose to look for ungrounded dispositions in specific physical theories, such as quantum mechanics. I explain why non-classical properties such as spin are best interpreted as irreducible dispositional properties, and I give reasons why even seemingly classical properties, for instance position or momentum, should receive a similar treatment when interpreted in the quantum realm. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, I argue that quantum dispositions should not be limited to probabilistic dispositions (propensities) by showing reasons why even possession of well-defined values of parameters should qualify as a dispositional property. I finally discuss the issue of the actuality of quantum dispositions, arguing that it may be justified to treat them as potentialities whose being has a lesser degree of reality than that of classical categorical properties, due to the incompatibility relations between non-commuting observables.
KeywordsDispositions Grounding Quantum mechanics Incompatibility
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Albert D. (1992) Quantum mechanics and experience. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong D. (1968) A materialistic theory of the mind. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Dorato M. (2007) Dispositions, relational properties and the quantum world. In: Kistler M., Gnassounou B. (eds) Dispositions and causal powers. Ashgate, England, pp 249–270Google Scholar
- Ellis B. (2001) Scientific essentialism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Fara, M. (2009). Dispositions. In E. N. Zalta (Ed), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/dispositions/.
- Hughes R. (1989) The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Molnar G. (2003) Powers: A study in metaphysics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Mumford S. (1998) Dispositions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Mumford S. (2007) Filled in space. In: Kistler M., Gnassounou B. (eds) Dispositions and causal powers. Ashgate, England, pp 67–80Google Scholar
- Prior E., Pargetter R., Jackson F. (1982) Three theses about dispositions. American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 251–257Google Scholar
- Thomson-Jones, M. (unpublished manuscript). Dispositions and quantum mechanics.Google Scholar