Foundations of Science

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 353–361

A Nonlinear Method for Measuring the Effects of Environmental Variations

Article

Abstract

Ever wonder if it is possible to construct a numeric scale for environmental variables, like one does for the temperature? This paper is an attempt to construct one. There are two main parts: section “Statistical Analysis of Variations” presents a general statistical strategy for environmental factor selection. Section “Nonlinear Analytical Geometric Model of Variations” develops an analytical geometric representation of system variations in response to environmental changes. The model is used to quantify the effects of environmental interactions. The paper treats only one-dimensional case, however, the derivation of the case of multiple independent factors follows immediately. The general method developed in this paper may prove applicable to many different fields, such as extensions beyond classical physics, economics, and other sciences. Section “Conclusion” provides an illustration of applications, examples and implications of the results.

Keywords

Statistical analysis of environmental variations Nonlinear scale of measurements Quantitative research Financial forecasting Nonverbal cognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boltzmann, L. (1974). The second law of thermodynamics.Google Scholar
  2. Bourbaki, N. (1969). Algebre linéaire et algebre multilinéaire.Google Scholar
  3. Dehaene S., Spelke E., Pinel P., Stanescu R., Tsivkin S. (1999) Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain maging evidence. Science 284: 970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Galton, F. (1897). Questions on the faculty of visions.Google Scholar
  5. Iftime, M. D. (2010). Complex aspects of gravity, preprint available online on the Math. Phy., arXiv: 1001.4571v4.Google Scholar
  6. Jordan K.E., Brannon E.M. (2006) A common representational system governed by Weber’s law: Nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 95: 215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kolesnikov S. I., Vinokurov V. A., Zaikov G. E., Kolesnikov I. M. (2001) Thermodynamics of spontaneous and non-spontaneous processes. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Kullback S. (1987) The Kullback—Leibler distance. The American Statistician 41: 4Google Scholar
  9. La Geometrie. (1637). English edn, Dover (1978).Google Scholar
  10. Landau L. D., Lifshitz E. M. (1977) The classical theory of fields. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Longo M. R., Lourenco S. F. (2007) Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia 45: 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BostonUSA

Personalised recommendations