Foundations of Science

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 29–38 | Cite as

Fine-Tuning, Quantum Mechanics and Cosmological Artificial Selection

  • Clément VidalEmail author


Jan Greben criticized fine-tuning by taking seriously the idea that “nature is quantum mechanical”. I argue that this quantum view is limited, and that fine-tuning is real, in the sense that our current physical models require fine-tuning. Second, I examine and clarify many difficult and fundamental issues raised by Rüdiger Vaas’ comments on Cosmological Artificial Selection.


Fine tuning Far future Entropy of the universe Universe simulation Cosmological artificial selection Artificial cosmogenesis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguirre, A. (2001). The cold big-bang cosmology as a counter-example to several anthropic arguments. arXiv:astro-ph/0106143v3.Google Scholar
  2. Apostel, L. (1999). Why not nothing? In D. Aerts, H. Van Belle, J. Van der Veken (Eds.), World views and the problem of synthesis, (pp. 17–49). The Yellow Book of “Einstein Meets Magritte”. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Barrow J. D. (1999) Impossibility: The limits of science and the science of limits. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Byl J. (1996) On the Natural Selection of Universes. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 37: 369Google Scholar
  5. Ćirković, M. M. (2003). Resource letter: PEs-1: Physical eschatology. American Journal of Physics 71, 122.
  6. Davies P. C. W. (1999) The fifth miracle. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis, G. F. R. (2007). Issues in the philosophy of cosmology. In J. Butterfield, & J. Earman (Eds.), Handbook in philosophy of physics, (pp. 1183–1285). Amsterdam: Elsevier. arXiv:astro-ph/0602280v2Google Scholar
  8. Gardner, J. N. (2003). Biocosm. The new scientific theory of evolution: Intelligent life is the architect of the universe. Maui, Hawaii: Inner Ocean Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Gratton C. (1994) Circular definitions, circular explanations, and infinite regresses. Argumentation 8(3): 295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greben, J. (2010). On the nature of initial conditions and fundamental parameters in physics and cosmology. Foundations of Science. doi: 10.1007/s10699-010-9217-4. arXiv:0912.5508v2.
  11. Harrison E. (1998) Creation and fitness of the universe. Astronomy & Geophysics 39(2): 27Google Scholar
  12. Heylighen, F. (1997). Objective, subjective and intersubjective selectors of knowledge. Evolution and Cognition 3(1), 63–67.
  13. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In The essential tension (pp. 320–339). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lloyd, S. (2000). Ultimate physical limits to computation. nature 406, 1047–1054.
  15. McMullin E. (2008) The virtues of a good theory. In: Stathis P., Martin C. (eds) The Routledge companion to philosophy of science. Routledge, London, pp 498–508Google Scholar
  16. Nottale, L. (2010). Scale relativity and fractal space-time: Theory and applications. Foundations of Science 15, no. 2 (3), 101–152. doi: 10.1007/s10699-010-9170-2. arXiv:0912.5508v2.
  17. Rescher N. (2000) The price of an ultimate theory. Philosophia Naturalis 37(1): 1–20Google Scholar
  18. Rescher N. (2006) Philosophical dialectics: An essay on metaphilosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Smart, J. (2009). Evo Devo Universe? A Framework for Speculations on Cosmic Culture. In S. J. Dick & M. L. Lupisella (Eds.), Cosmos and culture: Cultural evolution in a cosmic context (pp. 201–295). Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, NASA SP-2009-4802.
  20. Smolin L. (2006) The trouble with physics: The rise of string theory, The fall of a science, and what comes next. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. Stenger V. J. (2000) Natural explanations for the anthropic coincidences. Philo 3(2): 50–67Google Scholar
  22. Tegmark M., Aguirre A., Rees M. J., Wilczek F. (2006) Dimensionless constants, cosmology, and other dark matters. Physical Review D 73(2): 23505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vaas, R. (2003). Time before time–classifications of universes in contemporary cosmology, and how to avoid the antinomy of the beginning and eternity of the world. In W. Loeffler, & P. Weingartner (Eds.), Knowledge and belief (pp. 351–353). Kirchberg am Wechsel. arXiv:physics/0408111v1.Google Scholar
  24. Vaas, R. (2006). Dark Energy and Life’s Ultimate Future. In V. Burdyuzha, & G. Kohzin (Eds.), The future of life and the future of our civilization (pp. 231–247. Dordrecht: Springer. arXiv:physics/0703183v1.Google Scholar
  25. Vaas, R. (2010a). Cosmological artificial selection: Creation out of something? Foundations of Science. doi: 10.1007/s10699-010-9218-3. arXiv:0912.5508v2.
  26. Vaas, R. (2010b). Life, the universe, and almost Everything: Signs of cosmic design? 0910.5579. arXiv:0910.5579v1.Google Scholar
  27. Vidal, C. (2008). The future of scientific simulations: From artificial life to artificial cosmogenesis. In Death and anti-death C. Tandy (Eds.) 6: Thirty Years After Kurt Gödel (1906–1978) (pp. 285–318), Vol. 6. Ria University Press. arXiv:0803.1087v3 [cs.AI].Google Scholar
  28. Vidal, C. (2010a). Computational and biological analogies for understanding fine-tuned parameters in physics. Foundations of Science 15, no. 4(6): 375–393. doi: 10.1007/s10699-010-9183-x. arXiv:0912.5508v2.
  29. Vidal, C. (2010b). Analysis of some speculations concerning the far-future of intelligent civilizations. Foundations of Science. doi: 10.1007/s10699-010-9221-8. arXiv:0912.5508v2.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Center Leo Apostel, and Evolution, Complexity and CognitionVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations