Advertisement

Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 23–31 | Cite as

The positions of lanthanum (actinium) and lutetium (lawrencium) in the periodic table: an update

  • William B. Jensen
Article

Abstract

This article updates the author’s 1982 argument that lutetium and lawrencium, rather than lanthanum and actinium, should be assigned to the d-block as the heavier analogs of scandium and yttrium, whereas lanthanum and actinium should be considered as the first members of the f-block with irregular configurations. This update is embedded within a detailed analysis of Lavelle’s abortive 2008 attempt to discredit this suggestion.

Keywords

Periodic table Group 3 Lanthanum Lutetium Actinium Lawrencium 

References

  1. Brewer, L.: Energies of the electron configurations of the lanthanides and actinides. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1101–1111 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cronyn, M.W.: The proper place of hydrogen in the periodic table. J. Chem. Educ. 80, 947–951 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fang, L., Chen, C., Lombard, J.R.: Raman and absorption spectrum of mass-selected lutetium dimers in argon matrices. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 10202–10206 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fritzsche, S., Dong, C.Z., Koike, F., Uvarov, A.: The low-lying level structure of atomic lawrencium (Z = 103): energies and absorption rates. Eur. Phys. J. D 45, 107–113 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haire, R.G.: Insights into the bonding and electronic nature of heavy element materials. J. Alloy Compds. 444–445, 63–71 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jensen, W.B.: The positions of lanthanum (actinium) and lutetium (lawrencium) in the periodic table. J. Chem. Educ. 59, 634–636 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jensen, W.B.: The periodic table: facts or committees? J. Chem. Educ. 85, 1491–1493 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jensen, W.B.: Misapplying the periodic table. J. Chem. Educ. 86, 1186 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jørgensen, C.K.: The loose connection between electron configuration and the chemical behavior of the heavy elements (transuranics). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 12, 12–19 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lavelle, L.: Lanthanum (La) and actinium (Ac) should remain in the d-block. J. Chem. Educ. 85, 1482–1483 (2008a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lavelle, L.: Response to the flyleaf periodic table. J. Chem. Educ. 85, 1491 (2008b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lavelle, L.: Response to misapplying the periodic law. J. Chem. Educ. 86, 1187 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ouyang, Y., Wang, J., Hou, Y., Zhong, X., Du, Y., Feng, Y.: First principle study of AlX (X = 3d, 4d, 5d elements and Lu) dimers. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 074305-1–074305-6 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Silva, R.J.: Fermium, mendelevium, nobelium, and lawrencium. In: Morss, L.R., Edelstein, N.M., Fuger, J. (eds.) The Chemistry of the Actinides and Transactinide Elements, Chapt 13, vol. 3, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations