Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 311–326 | Cite as

Austere quantum mechanics as a reductive basis for chemistry

Article

Abstract

This paper analyses Richard Bader’s ‘operational’ view of quantum mechanics and the role it plays in the the explanation of chemistry. I argue that QTAIM can partially be reconstructed as an ‘austere’ form of quantum mechanics, which is in turn committed to an eliminative concept of reduction that stems from Kemeny and Oppenheim. As a reductive theory in this sense, the theory fails. I conclude that QTAIM has both a regulatory and constructive function in the theories of chemistry.

Keywords

Operational quantum mechanics Operationalism Atoms in molecules Electron density Reduction Explanation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Richard Bader for a fruitful discussion about some of the topics discussed in this paper. The present paper contains my considered response to some of the topics we discussed during his visit to Auckland in September 2010. I would like to thank two referees of an earlier draft of this paper for constructive comments.

References

  1. Bader, R.F.W.: Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. Oxford Science Publishers, Oxford (1990)Google Scholar
  2. Bader, R.F.W.: Principle of stationary action and the definition of a proper open system. Phys. Rev. 49(19), 348–356 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. Bader, R.F.W.: The Lagrangian approach to chemistry. In: The Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules, Chap. 2, pp. 37–59. Wiley-VCH, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  4. Bader, R.F.W.: Bond paths are not chemical bonds. J. Phys. Chem. 113, 10391–10396 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bader, R.F.W.: Definition of molecular structure: by choice or by appeal to observation? J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 7431–7444 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. Bader, R.F.W.: On the non-existence of parallel universes in chemistry. Found. Chem. 13, 11–37 (2011a). doi: 10.1007/s10698-011-9106-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bader, R.F.W.: Worlds apart in chemistry: a personal tribute to J. C. Slater. J Phys. Chem. A 115(45), 12667–12676 (2011b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bader, R.F.W., Matta, C.F.: Atoms in molecules as non-overlapping, bounded, space-filling open quantum systems. Found. Chem. 14, 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. Bader, R.F.W., Nguyen-Dang, T.T., Tal, Y.: A topological theory of molecular structure. Rep. Prog. Phys. 44(8), 893–948 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bokulich, A.: Reexamining The Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism. Cambridge University, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  11. Bridgman, P.: The Logic of Modern Physics. Macmillan, New York (1932)Google Scholar
  12. Cassam-Chenaï, P., Jayatilaka, D.: Some fundamental problems with zero flux partitioning of electron densities. Theor. Chem. Acc. 105, 213–218 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B., Laloë, F.: Quantum Mechanics. Wiley, Nwe York. Translated from the French by Susan Reid Hemley, Nicole Ostrowsky and Dan Ostrowsky (1977)Google Scholar
  14. Coulson, C.A.: Present state of molecular structure calculations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 32(2), 170–177 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dirac, P.: Quantum mechanics and the hydrogen atom. Proc. R. Soc. A 110, 561–579 (1926)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dirac, P.A.M.: The Lagrangian in quantum mechanics. Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion 3(1), 64–72 (1932)Google Scholar
  17. Dirac, P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1958)Google Scholar
  18. Feynman, R.P., Hibbs, A.R.: Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  19. Frank, P.G. (ed.): The Validation of Scientific Theories. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington (1954)Google Scholar
  20. Hempel, C.G.: The theoretician’s dilemma. In: Feigl, H., Scriven, M., Maxwell, G. (eds.) Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem, Vol. 2 of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 37–98. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1958)Google Scholar
  21. Hettema, H.: Reducing Chemistry to Physics: Limits, Models, Consequences. Createspace (2012)Google Scholar
  22. Jammer, M.: The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn. Tomash Publishers, American Institute of Physics, Annapolis (1989)Google Scholar
  23. Kemeny, J.G., Oppenheim, P.: On reduction. Philos. Stud. VII, 6–19 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis, G.N.: The atom and the molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38, 762–785 (1916)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matta, C.F., Bader, R.F.W.: An experimentalist’s reply to What Is an Atom in a Molecule? J. Phys. Chem. A 110(19), 6365–6371. PMID: 16686473 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. Moffitt, W.: Atoms in molecules and crystals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 210, 245–268 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagel, E.: The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, 4th edn. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1961)Google Scholar
  28. Nasertayoob, P., Shahbazian, S.: Revisiting the foundations of the quantum theory of atoms in molecules: toward a rigorous definition of topological atoms. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 109, 726–732 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pap, A.: Are physical magnitudes operationally definable? In: Churchman, C.W., Ratoosh, P. (eds.) Measurement: Definitions and Theories, Wiley, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  30. Russell, B.: A History of Western Philosophy, 4th edn. Simon and Schuster, New York (1945)Google Scholar
  31. Schwinger, J.: The theory of quantized fields. I. Phys. Rev. 82, 914–927 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Srebrenik, S., Bader, R.F.W.: Towards the development of the quantum mechanics of a subspace. J. Chem. Phys. 63(9), 3945–3961 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Styer, D.F., Balkin, M.S., Becker, K.M., Burns, M.R., Dudley, C.E., Forth, S.T., Gaumer, J.S., Kramer, M.A., Oertel, D.C., Park, L.H., Rinkoski, M.T., Smith, C.T., Wotherspoon, T.D.: Nine formulations of quantum mechanics. Am. J. Phys. 70(3), 288 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations