Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 173–186 | Cite as

Ontological tensions in sixteenth and seventeenth century chemistry: between mechanism and vitalism

Article

Abstract

The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries marks a period of transition between the vitalistic ontology that had dominated Renaissance natural philosophy and the Early Modern mechanistic paradigm endorsed by, among others, the Cartesians and Newtonians. This paper will focus on how the tensions between vitalism and mechanism played themselves out in the context of sixteenth and seventeenth century chemistry and chemical philosophy, particularly in the works of Paracelsus, Jan Baptista Van Helmont, Robert Fludd, and Robert Boyle. Rather than argue that these natural philosophers each embraced either fully vitalistic or fully mechanistic ontologies, I hope to demonstrate that these thinkers adhered to complicated and nuanced ontologies that cannot be described in either purely vitalistic or purely mechanistic terms. A central feature of my argument is the claim that a corpuscularian theory of matter does not entail a strictly mechanistic and reductionistic account of chemical properties. I also argue that what marks the shift from pre-modern vitalistic chemical philosophy to the modern chemical philosophy that marked the Chemical Revolution is not the victory of mechanism and reductionism in chemistry but, rather, the shift to a physicalistic and naturalistic account of chemical properties and vital spirits.

Keywords

Chemical philosophy Alchemy Vitalism Mechanism Paracelsus Van Helmont Boyle 

References

  1. Bianchi, M.L.: The visible and the invisible. From alchemy to Paracelsus. In: Rattansi, P., Clericuzio, A. (eds.) Alchemy and Chemistry in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, pp. 17–50. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)Google Scholar
  2. Clericuzio, A.: A redefinition of Boyle’s chemistry and corpuscular philosophy. Ann. Sci. 47, 561–589 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clericuzio, A.: The internal laboratory. The chemical reinterpretation of medical spirits in England (1650–1680). In: Rattansi, P., Clericuzio, A. (eds.) Alchemy and Chemistry in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, pp. 51–83. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)Google Scholar
  4. Clericuzio, A.: Elements, Principles and Corpuscles: A Study of Atomism and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  5. Debus, A.G.: The Paracelsian aerial niter. Isis 55, 43–61 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Debus, A.G.: The Chemical Philosophy: Paracelsian Science and Medicine in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Dover, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  7. Descartes, R.: Oeuvres Philosophiques (1643–1650), Tome III. Éditions Garnier Frères, Paris (1973)Google Scholar
  8. Hankins, T.L.: Science and the Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  9. Joly, B.: Chimie et mécanisme dans la nouvelle Académie royale des sciences: les débats entre Louis Lémery et Etienne-François Geoffroy. Methodos 8, (2008), Chimie et mécanisme à l’âge classique, [on line] posted online 31 Mar 2008. URL: http://www.methodos.revues.org/document1403.html. Accessed 6 Apr 2009
  10. Kuhn, T.: Robert Boyle and structural chemistry. Isis 43, 12–36 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Newman, W.R., Principe, L.M.: Alchemy and the changing significance of analysis. In: Buchwald, J.Z., Franklin, A. (eds.) Wrong for the Right Reasons, pp. 73–89. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rattansi, P., Clericuzio, A. (eds.): Alchemy and chemistry in the 16th and 17th centuries. International archives of the history of ideas no. 140. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)Google Scholar
  13. Rossi, P.: The Birth of Modern Science, translated by Cynthia De Nardi Ipsen. Blackwell, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  14. Stehr, N., Meja, V. (eds.): Society & Knowledge: Contemporary Perspectives in the Sociology of Knowledge and Science. Transaction, New Brunswick (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations