Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 201–222

From phlogiston to caloric: chemical ontologies



The ‘triumph of the anti-phlogistians’ is a familiar story to the historians and philosophers of science who characterize the Chemical Revolution as a broad conceptual shift. The apparent “incommensurability” of the paradigms across the revolutionary divide has caused much anxiety. Chemists could identify phlogiston and oxygen, however, only with different sets of instrumental practices, theoretical schemes, and philosophical commitments. In addition, the substantive counterpart to phlogiston in the new chemistry was not oxygen, but caloric. By focusing on the changing visions of chemical body across the revolutionary divide with a more sensitive probe into the historical actors’ material manipulations and linguistic usage, we can historicize their laboratory realities and philosophical agenda. An archeology of chemical bodies that configures the fragile stability of the material worlds chemists created in succession promises a philosophical horizon that would recognize our hybrid (natural–artificial) environment as an evolving investigative object of science.


Phlogiston Caloric Chemical ontologies Incommensurability Lavoisier Guyton de Morveau 


  1. Baird, D.: Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. University of California Press, Berkeley (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Beiser, F.C.: Kant’s intellectual development: 1746–1781. In: Guyer, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant, pp. 26–61. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beretta, M. (ed.): A New Course of Chemistry: Lavoisier’s First Chemical Paper. L.S. Olschski, Firenze (1994)Google Scholar
  4. Beretta, M.: Lavoisier and his last printed work: the Mémoires de physique et de chimie (1805). Ann. Sci. 58, 327–356 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S. (eds.): Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  6. Bret, P.: Trois décennies d’études lavoisiennes. Revue d’histoire des Sciences 48, 169–205 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrier, M.: Kant’s theory of matter and his views on chemistry. In: Watkins, E. (ed.) Kant and the Sciences, pp. 205–230. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, H.: The hidden history of phlogiston: how philosophical failure can generate historiographical improvement. Hyle 16, 47–79 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. Chimisso, C.: Hélène Metzger: the history of science between the studies of mentality and total history. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 32, 203–241 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christie, J.R.R.: Narrative and rhetoric in Hélène Metzger’s historiography of 18th-century chemistry. Hist. Sci. 25, 99–109 (1987)Google Scholar
  11. Conant, J.B.: The Overthrow of the Phlogiston Theory: The Chemical Revolution of 1775–1789. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1950)Google Scholar
  12. Conant, J.B.: Robert Boyle’s Experiments in Pneumatics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1958)Google Scholar
  13. de Condillac, E.-B.: Logique (1780). In: Oeuvres de Condillac, 34 vols. Libraires associs, Paris (1801), v. 23Google Scholar
  14. de Condillac, E.-B.: La Langue des Calculs (1798). IbidGoogle Scholar
  15. de Condillac, E. B.: A treatise on systems. In: Philosophical Writings of Etienne Bonnot, abbé de Condillac, pp. 1–153. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1982)Google Scholar
  16. de Condillac, E.B.: An Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge. AMS Press, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  17. Daston, L., Galison, P.: Objectivity. Zone Books, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  18. Daumas, M.: Lavoisier, Théoricien et expérimentateur. Presses Universitaires de France (1955)Google Scholar
  19. Domanska, E.: The material presence of the past. Hist. Theory 45, 337–348 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donovan, A. (ed.).: The Chemical Revolution: Essays in Reinterpretation. Osiris [2] 4 (1988)Google Scholar
  21. Donovan, A.: Laoisier as chemist and experimental physicist: a reply to Perrin. Isis 81, 270–272 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donovan, A.: Antoine Lavoisier: Science, Administration, and Revolution. Blackwell, Oxford (1993)Google Scholar
  23. Eller, J.T.: Dissertation sur les elemens ou premiers principes des corps. Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences et des belles-lettres de Berlin 2, pp. 3–48 (1746)Google Scholar
  24. Friedman, M.: Kant and the Exact Sciences. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  25. Friedman, M.: History and philosophy of science in a new key. Isis 99, 125–134 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galison, P.: Ten problems in history and philosophy of science. Isis 99, 111–124 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Golinski, J.: Hélène Metzger and the interpretation of seventeenth century chemistry. Hist. Sci. 25, 85–97 (1987)Google Scholar
  28. Goupil, M. (ed.): Lavoisier et la Révolution chimique. SABIX-Ecole polytechnique (1992)Google Scholar
  29. Gadamer, H.-G.: Truth and Method. 2nd ed. Continuum, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  30. Grosholz, E.R., Hoffmann, R.: How symbolic and iconic languages bridge the two worlds of the chemist: a case study from contemporary bioorganic chemistry. In: Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S. (eds.) Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry, pp. 230–247. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  31. Guerlac, H.: Lavoisier—the Crucial Year. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1961)Google Scholar
  32. Guerlac, H.: Chemistry as a branch of physics: Laplace’s collaboration with Lavoisier. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 7, 193–276 (1976)Google Scholar
  33. Guyton de Morveau, L.-B.: Digressions Académique. L.N. Frantin, Dijon (1772)Google Scholar
  34. Hacking, I.: Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  35. Holmes, F.L.: Eighteenth Century Chemistry as an Investigative Enterprise. Office for History of Science and Technology, Berkeley (1989)Google Scholar
  36. Holmes, F.L.: The ‘revolution in chemistry and physics’: overthrow of a reigning paradigm or competition between contemporary research programs? Isis 91, 735–753 (2000a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holmes, F.L.: Phlogiston in the air. Nuova Voltiana 2, 73–111 (2000b)Google Scholar
  38. Ihde, D.: Instrumental Realism: The Interface Between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1991)Google Scholar
  39. Kant, I.: Prolegomena (1783). In: Ellington, J.W. (ed.) Philosophy of Material Nature. Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis (1985a)Google Scholar
  40. Kant, I.: Metaphysical foundations of natural science (1786). In: Ellington, J.W. (ed.) Philosophy of Material Nature. Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis (1985b)Google Scholar
  41. Kim, M. G.: The layers of chemical language. Hist. Sci. 30, 69–96 and 397–437 (1992)Google Scholar
  42. Kim, M.G.: Labor and mirage: writing the history of chemistry. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 26, 155–165 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim, M.G.: Chemical analysis and the domains of reality: Wilhelm Homberg’s Essais de Chimie, 1702–1709. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 31, 37–69 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim, M.G.: The analytic ideal of chemical elements: Robert Boyle and the French didactic tradition of chemistry. Sci. Context 14, 361–395 (2001)Google Scholar
  45. Kim, M.G.: Affinity, That Elusive Dream: A Genealogy of the Chemical Revolution. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  46. Kim, M.G.: Lavoisier, the father of modern chemistry? In: Beretta, M. (ed.) Lavoisier in Perspective, pp. 167–192. Deutsches Museum, Munich (2005)Google Scholar
  47. Kim, M. G.: Experimental systems and theory domains in pre-Lavoisian chemistry. In: Malaquias, I., Hombourg, E., Callapez, M. E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on History of Chemistry: Chemistry, Technology and Society, pp. 468–482. SPQ, Aveiro (2006)Google Scholar
  48. Kim, M.G.: The ‘instrumental’ reality of phlogiston. Hyle 14, 27–51 (2008)Google Scholar
  49. Kim, M.G.: Entre la physique et la chimie: L’Affinité chimique dans l’Encyclopédie. Corpus 56, 143–167 (2009a)Google Scholar
  50. Kim, M.G.: A historical atlas of objectivity. Mod. Intellect. Hist. 6, 569–596 (2009b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kirwan, R.: An essay on phlogiston and the constitution of acids, to which are added notes, exhibiting and defending the antiphlogistic theory; and annexed to the French edition of this work; by Messrs. De Morveau, Lavoisier, the la Place, Monge, Berthoolet, and de Fourcroy. J. Johnson, London (1789)Google Scholar
  52. Kitcher, P.: Theories, theorists and theoretical change. Philos. Rev. 87, 519–547 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Klein, U., Lefèvre, W.: Materials in Eighteenth-Century Science: A Historical Ontology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  54. Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962)Google Scholar
  55. Kuhn, T.S.: The relations between the history and the philosophy of science. In: Essential Tension, pp. 3–20. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1977)Google Scholar
  56. Lakatos, I.: Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 91–195. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970)Google Scholar
  57. Meldrum, A.N.: The Eighteenth-Century Revolution in Science—the First Phase. Calcutta (1930)Google Scholar
  58. Latour, B.: When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. Br. J. Sociol. 51, 107–123 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Latour, B.: Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Crit. Inq. 30, 225–248 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lavoisier, A.-L.: Recherches sur les moyens les plus sûrs, les plus exacts et les plus commodes de déterminer la pesanteur spécifique des fluids soit pour la physique soit pour le commerce. In: Dumas, J.B., Grimaux, E., Fouqué, F.A. (eds.) Oeuvres de Lavoisier, vol. 3, pp. 427–450. Imprimerie Imperial, Paris, 6 vols. (1862–1893)Google Scholar
  61. Lavoisier, A.-L.: Elements of Chemistry. Dover, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  62. Lemery, N.: A Course of Chemistry, 2nd English ed. London (1686)Google Scholar
  63. Lodwig, T.H., Smeaton, W.A.: The ice calorimeter of Lavoisier and Laplace and some of its critics. Ann. Sci. 31, 1–18 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lycan, W.G.: The sighting of smell. In: Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S. (eds.) Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry, pp. 273–289. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  65. McCormmach, R.: Speculative Truth: Henry Cavendish, Natural Philosophy, and the Rise of Modern Theoretical Science. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  66. Metzger, H.: Les doctrines chimiques en France du début du XVIIe à la fin du XVIIIe siècle, new edition. Albert Blanchard (1969)Google Scholar
  67. Melhado, E.M.: Chemistry, physics, and the chemical revolution. Isis 76, 195–211 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Melhado, E.M.: On the historiography of science: a reply to Perrin. Isis 81, 273–276 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morton, T.H.: Archiving odors. In: Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S. (eds.) Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry, pp. 251–272. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  70. Musgrave, A.: Why did oxygen supplant phlogiston? Research programmes in the Chemical Revolution. In: Howson, C. (ed.) Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences: The Critical Background to Modern Science, 1800–1905, pp. 181–209. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Partington, J.R., McKie, D.: Historical studies on the phlogiston theory. Ann. Sci. 2, 361–404 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Partington, J.R., McKie, D.: Historical studies on the phlogiston theory. Ann. Sci. 3, 1–58 and 337–371 (1938)Google Scholar
  73. Partington, J.R., McKie, D.: Historical studies on the phlogiston theory. Ann. Sci. 4, 113–149 (1939)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Perrin, C.E.: The triumph of the anti-phlogistians. In: Woolf, H. (ed.) The Analytic Spirit: Essays in the History of Science in Honor of Henry Guerlac, pp. 40–63. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1981)Google Scholar
  75. Perrin, C.E.: Chemistry as peer of physics: a response to Donovan and Melhado on Lavoisier. Isis 81, 259–270 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Perrin, C.E.: The chemical revolution: shifts in guiding assumptions. In: Donovan, A., Laudan, L., Laudan, R. (eds.) Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change, pp. 105–124. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1992)Google Scholar
  77. Poirier, J.-P.: Lavoisier: Chemist, Biologist, Economist. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1996)Google Scholar
  78. Pyle, A.: The rationality of the chemical revolution. In: Nola, R., Sankey, H. (eds.) After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend, pp. 99–124. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  79. Radder, H. (ed.): The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (2003)Google Scholar
  80. Richardson, A.: Scientific philosophy as a topic for history of science. Isis 99, 88–96 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Roberts, L.: A word and the world: the significance of naming the calorimeter. Isis 82, 198–222 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Roberts, L.: Condillac, Lavoisier, and the instrumentalization of science. Eighteenth Century Theory Interpret. 33, 252–271 (1992)Google Scholar
  83. Rappaport, R.: Lavoisier’s theory of the earth. Br. J. Hist. Sci. 6, 247–260 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rorty, R.: Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1979)Google Scholar
  85. Rosenfeld, S., Bhushan, N.: Chemical synthesis: complexity, similarity, natural kinds, and the evolution of a ‘logic’. In: Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S. (eds.) Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry, pp. 187–207. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  86. Sibum, H. O. (ed.) Science and the changing senses of reality circa 1900. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 39, 295–458 (2008)Google Scholar
  87. Siegfried, R., Dobbs, B.J.: Composition, a neglected aspect of the chemical revolution. Ann. Sci. 24, 275–293 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Siegfried, R.: Lavoisier’s view of gaseous state and its early application to pneumatic chemistry. Isis 63, 59–78 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Staley, R.: Worldviews and physicists’ experience of disciplinary change: on the uses of ‘classical’ physics. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 39, 298–311 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thagard, P.: Conceptual structure of the chemical revolution. Philos. Sci. 57, 183–209 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Thagard, P.: Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992)Google Scholar
  92. Tiles, M., Tiles, J.: An Introduction to Historical Epistemology: The Authority of Knowledge. Blackwell, Oxford (1993)Google Scholar
  93. Toulmin, S.E.: Crucial experiments: Priestley and Lavoisier. J. Hist. Ideas 18, 205–220 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. White, J.H.: The History of the Phlogiston Theory. Edward Arnold, London (1932)Google Scholar
  95. Woody, A., Glymour, C. Missing elements: what philosophers of science might discover in chemistry. In: Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S. (eds.) Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry, pp. 17–33. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  96. Yeo, R.R.: Scientific method and the rhetoric of science in Britain, 1830–1917. In: Schuster, J.A., Yeo, R.R. (eds.) The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method, pp. 259–297. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1986)Google Scholar
  97. Yeo, R.R.: Defining Science: William Whewell, Natural Knowledge, and Public Debate in Early Victorian Britain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations