Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 109–119 | Cite as

Elements of the third kind and the spin-dependent chemical force

Article

Abstract

A lively philosophical debate has lately arisen over the nature of elementhood in chemistry. Two different senses in which the technical term ELEMENT is currently in use by chemists have been identified, leaving chemistry open to the logical fallacy of equivocation. This paper introduces a third, more elemental candidate: the high-enthalpy short-lived unbonded atom. An enthalpy index based on free-atoms-as-elements is established, whereby one can monitor the degree to which an atom’s spin-based attractive force is implemented exo-enthalpically when the atom binds chemically to others. Enthalpy indexing shows that the strength of an atom’s attractive force is proportional to its spin angular momentum. Vibrational spectroscopy shows that the force varies inversely as the fourth power of the inter-atom distance. Both features differentiate the chemical force from the stronger electromagnetic force and from the weaker Van der Waals force.

Keywords

Homomeric molecule Pseudo-element Protochemical atom Atomic spin Chemical force Enthalpy index 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Reviewer #2 for suggesting a more focused treatment of the chemical elements and for pointing out several errors of fact in an earlier draft.

References

  1. Dalton J.: A New System of Chemical Philosophy, plate 4, p. 219. Bickerstaff, Manchester (1808). Through mistaking molecular elements for atomic elements, 9 of Dalton’s 19 ‘atomic’ weights were in error by at least 80%; thereby creating huge problems for analytical chemists trying to establish empirical formulas in the 19th centuryGoogle Scholar
  2. Eyring H., et al.: Quantum Chemistry, p. 214. Wiley, (1944)Google Scholar
  3. Feynman R., et al.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. II, pp. 37-1 and 37-2. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1964)Google Scholar
  4. Gaydon A.G.: Dissociation Energies and Spectra of Diatomic Molecules. Chapman & Hall, London (1968)Google Scholar
  5. Harré, R.: Chemical kinds and essences revisited. Found. Chem. 7, 7–30 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hendry, R.F.: Lavoisier and Mendeleev on the elements. Found. Chem. 7, 31–48 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lavoisier A.: Traité élémentaire de Chimie, présenté dans un ordre nouveau et d’aprés les découvertes modernes [Elementary Treatise on Chemistry], pp. 5–6, Cuchet, Paris (1789). The Kerr translation of 1790 is unreliable. Lavoisier’s French “molécule”, used 36 times in Chapter 1, becomes either “atom” or “particle” throughout; the English molecule never appearsGoogle Scholar
  8. Lewis, G.N., Randall, M.: Thermodynamics and the Free Energy of Chemical Substances, pp. 596–608. McGraw-Hill, New York (1923)Google Scholar
  9. Morse, P.M.: Diatomic molecules according to the wave mechanics. II. Vibrational levels. Phys Rev 34, 57–64 (1929)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Paneth, F.: The epistemological status of the chemical concept of element. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 13, 1–14, 144–160 (1962). [reprinted in Found. Chem. 5, 113–145, (2003)]Google Scholar
  11. Parsegian, V.A.: Van der Waals Forces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  12. Scerri, E.R.: Some aspects of the metaphysics of chemistry and the nature of the elements. HYLE 11, 127–145 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. Sharlow, M.F.: Chemical elements and the problem of universals. Found. Chem. 8, 225–242 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wagman, D.D., et al.: The NBS tables of chemical thermodynamic properties. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 11(Suppl 2), 1–392 (1982)Google Scholar
  15. Wallerstein, G., et al.: Synthesis of the elements in stars: forty years of progress. Rev Mod Phys 69, 995–1084 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.LondonCanada

Personalised recommendations