Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 97–107 | Cite as

The autonomy of chemistry: old and new problems

Article

Abstract

The autonomy of chemistry and the legitimacy of the philosophy of chemistry are usually discussed in the context of the issue of reduction of chemistry to physics, and defended making use of the failure of reductionistic claims. Until quite recent times a rather widespread viewpoint was, however, that the failure of reductionistic claims concerns actually epistemological aspect of reduction only, but the ontological reduction of chemistry to physics cannot be denied. The new problems of the autonomy of chemistry in the context of reductionism seem to be ontological and metaphysical. In the present paper it is argued that there is no need for some kind of metaphysical-ontological underpinning for rejection of the secondary positions of chemistry and philosophy of chemistry with respect to physics and philosophy of physics. The issue can be elucidated in terms of the philosophy of science accepting practical realism (also known by other names).

Keywords

Autonomy of chemistry Metaphysics Natural kinds Ontology Practical realism Reduction of chemistry to physics 

References

  1. Blackburn, S.: Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)Google Scholar
  2. Chalmers, A.F.: What Is This Thing Called Science? An Assessment of the Nature and Status of Science and its Methods, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Milton Keynes (1986)Google Scholar
  3. Giere, R.N.: Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1988)Google Scholar
  4. Giere, R.N.: Scientific Perspectivism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2006)Google Scholar
  5. Hacking, I.: Representing and Intervening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  6. Harré, R.: Varieties of Realism: A Rationale for the Natural Sciences. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
  7. Harré, R.: Review of Jaap van Brakel, Philosophy of Chemistry. Between the manifest and the scientific image, Leuven University Press, 2000. Hyle 7(2), 178–180 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Hendry, R.F.: Lavoisier and Mendeleev on the elements. Found. Chem. 7, 31–48 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hendry, R.F.: Substantial confusion. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 37, 322–336 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ladyman, J., Ross, D. (with D. Spurrett and J. Collier.): Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  11. Lombardi, O., Labarca, M.: The ontological autonomy of the chemical world. Found. Chem. 7, 125–148 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lombardi, O., Labarca, M.: The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: a response to Needham. Found. Chem. 8, 81–92 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loux, M.J., Zimmerman, D.W.: Introduction. In: Loux, M.J., Zimmerman, D.W. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, pp. 1–7. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Losee, J.: A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  15. Marx, K.: Theses on Feuerbach (1845). In: Engels, F. (ed.) Ludwig Feuerbach and the Outcome of Classical German Philosophy, pp. 73–75. Co-operarive Publishing Society of Foreign Workers in the USSR, Moscow (1934)Google Scholar
  16. Mendeleev, D.I.: Principles of Chemistry Vol. I (1st English ed). Longmans, Green (1891)Google Scholar
  17. Needham, P.: Ontological reduction: a comment on Lombardi and Labarca. Found. Chem. 8, 73–80 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Niiniluoto, I.: Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  19. Putnam, H.: Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, H.: Realism with a Human Face. Harvard University Press. Cambridge (MA) and London (UK) (1992)Google Scholar
  21. Rouse, J.: Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1987)Google Scholar
  22. Rouse, J.: Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1996)Google Scholar
  23. Rouse, J.: How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2002)Google Scholar
  24. Rouse, J.: Kuhn’s philosophy of scientific practice. In: Nickles, T. (ed.) Thomas Kuhn, pp. 101–121. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  25. Scerri, E.R.: Editorial 20. Found. Chem. 7, 119–123 (2005a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scerri, E.R.: Some aspects of the metaphysics of chemistry and the nature of the elements. Hyle 11(2), 127–145 (2005b)Google Scholar
  27. Scerri, E.R.: On the continuity of reference of the elements: a response to Hendry. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 37, 308–321 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van Brakel, J.: Philosophy of Chemistry. Leuven University Press, Leuven (2000)Google Scholar
  29. Vihalemm, R.: Can chemistry be handled as its own type of science? In: Psarros, N., Gavroglu, K. (eds.) Ars Mutandi—Issues in Philosophy and History of Chemistry, pp. 83–88. Leipziger Universitätsverlag, Leipzig (1999)Google Scholar
  30. Vihalemm, R.: Chemistry as an interesting subject for the philosophy of science. In: Vihalemm, R. (ed.) Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 219), pp. 185–200. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vihalemm, R.: Are laws of nature and scientific theories peculiar in chemistry? Scrutinizing Mendeleev’s discovery. Found. Chem. 5, 7–22 (2003a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vihalemm, R.: Natural kinds, explanation, and essentialism in chemistry. In: Earley Sr, J.E. (ed.) Chemical Explanation: Characteristics, Development, Autonomy. (Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 988), pp. 59–70. New York Academy of Sciences, New York (2003b)Google Scholar
  33. Vihalemm, R.: The problem of the unity of science and chemistry. In: Sobczyńska, D., Zeidler, P., Zielonacka-Lis, E. (eds.) Chemistry in the Philosophical Melting Pot. (Dia-Logos: Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences, 5), pp. 39–58. Peter Lang Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt am Main (2004)Google Scholar
  34. Vihalemm, R.: Chemistry and a theoretical model of science: on the occasion of a recent debate with the christies. Found. Chem. 7, 171–182 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vihalemm, R.: A. Whitehead’s metaphysical ontology and I. Prigogine’s scientific ontology: from a point of view of a theoretical conception of science. Problemos 71, 78–90 (2007a)Google Scholar
  36. Vihalemm, R.: Philosophy of chemistry and the image of science. Found. Sci. 12, 223–234 (2007b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations