Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 41–54 | Cite as

Microstructuralism and macromolecules: the case of moonlighting proteins

Article

Abstract

Microstructuralism in the philosophy of chemistry is the thesis that chemical kinds can be individuated in terms of their microstructural properties (Hendry in Philos Sci 73:864–875, 2006). Elements provide paradigmatic examples, since the atomic number should suffice to individuate the kind. In theory, Microstructuralism should also characterise higher-level chemical kinds such as molecules, compounds, and macromolecules based on their constituent atomic properties. In this paper, several microstructural theses are distinguished. An analysis of macromolecules such as moonlighting proteins suggests that all the forms of microstructuralism cannot accommodate them.

Keywords

Natural Kinds Microstructuralism Macromolecules Polymer Protein Essentialism Moonlighting Protein 

References

  1. Bogaard, P.A.: The philosophical content of quantum chemistry. In: Bogaard, P.A., Treash, G. (eds.) Metaphysics as foundation—essays in honor of ivor leclerc. State University of New York Press, Albany (1993)Google Scholar
  2. Consortium: Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 431, 931–945 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellis, B.: Scientific essentialism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, B.: The philosophy of nature. Acumen, Chesham (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, B.: Physical realism. Ratio 18, 371–384 (2005). Reprinted in Metaphysics in science, Drewery, A. (ed.). pp. 1–13. Oxford: Blackwell (2006)Google Scholar
  6. Hendry, R.F.: Elements, compounds and other chemical kinds. Philos. Sci. 73, 864–875 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeffrey, C.J.: Moonlighting proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 8–11 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeffrey, C.J.: Multifunctional proteins: examples of gene sharing. Ann. Med. 35, 28–35 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeffrey, C.J.: Molecular mechanisms for multitasking: recent crystal structures of moonlighting proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 663–668 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeffrey, C.J.: Moonlighting Proteins–an update. Mol. BioSyst. 5, 345–350 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Needham, P.: What is water. Analysis 60, 13–21 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Piatigorsky, J.: Lens crystalins. Innovation associated with changes in gene regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4277–4280 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. Tobin, E.: Crosscutting natural kinds and the hierarchy thesis. In: Beebee, H., Leary, N. (eds.) The semantics and metaphysics of natural kinds. Routledge Studies in Metaphysics (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  14. Tompa, P.: The functional benefits of protein disorder. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 666–667, 361–371 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tompa, P., Csermely, P.: The role of structural disorder in the function of RNA and protein chaperones. FASEB J. 18(11), 1169–1175 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tompa, P., Szasz, C., Buday, L.: Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30(9), 484–489 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Brakel, J.: Philosophy of chemistry. Leuven University Press, Leuven (2000)Google Scholar
  18. Wooley, R.G.: Must a molecule have a shape?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1073–1078 (1978)Google Scholar
  19. Young, R.J., Lovell, P.A.: Introduction to polymers, 2nd edn. CRC Press, London (1991)Google Scholar
  20. Zeidler, P.: The epistemological status of theoretical models of molecular structure. Hyle—Int. J. Philos. Chem. 6, 17–34 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations